IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7115-d1459412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity Analysis of the Interaction between Government Carbon Quota Mechanism and Manufacturers’ Emission Reduction Strategies under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Abudureheman Kadeer

    (School of Information Management, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

  • Jinghan Yang

    (School of Information Management, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

  • Shiyi Zhao

    (School of Information Management, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

Abstract

Based on different carbon quota trading mechanisms, the price and emission reduction strategies of oligopoly manufacturers in the low-carbon market and the government carbon quota mechanism are considered. A dynamic game evolution model of the two oligopoly manufacturers with competitive relations is established. The stability of the equilibrium point of the game model, the price adjustment speed of the decision variable, the impact of carbon emission reduction investment, and the government carbon quota on the system are discussed. Through nonlinear dynamics research, it is found that the advantage of the grandfathering method is that it is conducive to maintaining market stability when the government’s carbon quota decision changes; the advantage of the benchmarking method is that when manufacturers formulate price adjustment strategies, the benchmarking method carbon quota mechanism has a stronger stability range for the market, the manufacturer’s profit price adjustment speed is positively correlated, and the government carbon quota decision and emission reduction investment are also positively correlated. Decision makers need to choose appropriate carbon quota mechanisms and manufacturers’ emission reduction strategies according to actual market changes to maintain supply chain stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Abudureheman Kadeer & Jinghan Yang & Shiyi Zhao, 2024. "Complexity Analysis of the Interaction between Government Carbon Quota Mechanism and Manufacturers’ Emission Reduction Strategies under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7115-:d:1459412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Jixiang & Da, Qingli & Wang, Yanhua, 2009. "The dynamics of Bertrand model with bounded rationality," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2048-2055.
    2. Huang, Hu & Ke, Hua & Wang, Lei, 2016. "Equilibrium analysis of pricing competition and cooperation in supply chain with one common manufacturer and duopoly retailers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 12-21.
    3. Steffen Hentrich & Patrick Matschoss & Peter Michaelis, 2009. "Emissions trading and competitiveness: lessons from Germany," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 316-329, May.
    4. Zhao, Liuwei & Jin, Shuai & Jiang, Hongyun, 2022. "Investigation of complex dynamics and chaos control of the duopoly supply chain under the mixed carbon policy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Dwi Iryaning Handayani & Ilyas Masudin & Ahmad Rusdiansyah & Judi Suharsono, 2021. "Production-Distribution Model Considering Traceability and Carbon Emission: A Case Study of the Indonesian Canned Fish Food Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Kumar Jena, Sarat & Sarmah, S.P, 2014. "Price competition and co-operation in a duopoly closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 346-360.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10972 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Dixit, Avinash K, 1986. "Comparative Statics for Oligopoly," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 27(1), pages 107-122, February.
    9. Brianzoni, Serena & Campisi, Giovanni & Colasante, Annarita, 2022. "Nonlinear banking duopoly model with capital regulation: The case of Italy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Bryan W. Husted & José De Jesus Salazar, 2006. "Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 75-91, January.
    11. Ding, Shasha & Sun, Hao & Sun, Panfei & Han, Weibin, 2022. "Dynamic outcome of coopetition duopoly with implicit collusion," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luciano Fanti & Luca Gori, 2013. "Stability Analysis in a Bertrand Duopoly with Different Product Quality and Heterogeneous Expectations," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 481-501, December.
    2. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2011. "The dynamics of a Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products and bounded rational firms revisited," MPRA Paper 33268, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Georges SARAFOPOULOS & Kosmas PAPADOPOULOS, 2017. "On A Cournot Duopoly Game With Differentiated Goods, Heterogeneous Expectations And A Cost Function Including Emission Costs," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 16(1), pages 11-22.
    4. Tomasz Dubiel-Teleszyński, 2010. "Complex Dynamics in a Bertrand Duopoly Game with Heterogeneous Players," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 2(2), pages 95-116, March.
    5. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca & Mammana, Cristiana & Michetti, Elisabetta, 2013. "The dynamics of a Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products: Synchronization, intermittency and global dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 73-86.
    6. Joaquín Andaluz & Gloria Jarne, 2019. "On price stability and the nature of product differentiation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 741-762, April.
    7. Fletcher, Stanley M. & Nadolnyak, Denis A., 2005. "Accommodating Imperfect Competition in A Model of World Peanut Trade," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19460, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Rodney Beard, 2015. "N-Firm Oligopoly With General Iso-Elastic Demand," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(4), pages 336-345, October.
    9. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Salant, Stephen W., 2011. "A free lunch in the commons," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 245-253, May.
    10. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    11. Rinaldo Brau & Carlo Carraro, 2011. "The design of voluntary agreements in oligopolistic markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 111-142, April.
    12. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2013. "Efficient bargaining versus right to manage: A stability analysis in a Cournot duopoly with trade unions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 205-211.
    13. Dirk Boehe & Luciano Barin Cruz, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 325-346, February.
    14. Bassanini, Anna & Pouyet, Jerome, 2005. "Strategic choice of financing systems in regulated and interconnected industries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 233-259, February.
    15. Yang, Hui & Chen, Jing & Chen, Xu & Chen, Bintong, 2017. "The impact of customer returns in a supply chain with a common retailer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 139-150.
    16. Boone, Jan & Müller, Wieland, 2012. "The distribution of harm in price-fixing cases," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 265-276.
    17. Aslan, Hadiye & Kumar, Praveen, 2016. "The product market effects of hedge fund activism," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 226-248.
    18. Hanan Alhaddi, 2014. "The Influence of Triple Bottom Line on Strategic Positioning: An Exploratory Case Study on Differentiation through Image," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 55-72, February.
    19. Clément Carbonnier, 2005. "Is Tax Shifting Asymmetric? Evidence from French VAT reforms, 1995-2000," Working Papers halshs-00590719, HAL.
    20. Sen, Debapriya & Stamatopoulos, Giorgos, 2016. "Licensing under general demand and cost functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 673-680.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7115-:d:1459412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.