IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5015-d1413495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualizing Sustainable Business Models Aligning with Corporate Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Wen Lee

    (Department of International Business, College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan)

  • Mao-Wen Fu

    (Ph.D. Program in Business, College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan)

Abstract

Our research is dedicated to developing sustainable business models (SBMs). In this study, we review numerous empirical articles, reviews, and papers on SBMs, including 17,412 SCIE articles and 17,237 SSCI papers, published between 2009 and 2023. Our research provides guidance on how to achieve and maintain sustainability. We identify the most effective practices for conceptualizing an SBM. Our citations of over 130 articles highlight the importance of integrating corporate actions and consequences across the environmental, societal, and economic spheres, while also considering stakeholder engagement and long-term perspectives. We also emphasize the need to move beyond the traditional dichotomous treatment of SBMs and reflect more contemporary practices. To provide a more practical explanation, we use fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to predict the future evolution of SBMs from a corporate responsibility perspective, drawing on the lessons of the China phenomenon. This approach clarifies how the theoretical and practical elements obtained from the literature correspond with the new SBMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Wen Lee & Mao-Wen Fu, 2024. "Conceptualizing Sustainable Business Models Aligning with Corporate Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-31, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5015-:d:1413495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franke, Markus, 2004. "Competition between network carriers and low-cost carriers—retreat battle or breakthrough to a new level of efficiency?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 15-21.
    2. Polonsky, Michael Jay & Rosenberger, Philip III, 2001. "Reevaluating green marketing: a strategic approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 21-30.
    3. G Tomas M Hult & David J Ketchen & David A Griffith & Brian R Chabowski & Mary K Hamman & Bernadine Johnson Dykes & Wesley A Pollitte & S Tamer Cavusgil, 2008. "An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(6), pages 1064-1080, September.
    4. Eunha Chun & Heerim Joung & Young Ju Lim & Eunju Ko, 2021. "Business transparency and willingness to act environmentally conscious behavior: Applying the sustainable fashion evaluation system “Higg Index”," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 437-452, July.
    5. Andrew Marshall & Pauline Weetman, 2007. "Modelling Transparency in Disclosure: The Case of Foreign Exchange Risk Management," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5-6), pages 705-739.
    6. Giannakis, Mihalis & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 455-470.
    7. Bowie, Norman, 1991. "New directions in corporate social responsibility," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 56-65.
    8. Erin M. Reid & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(11), pages 1157-1178, November.
    9. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    10. Jill Brown & William Forster, 2013. "CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 301-312, January.
    11. Sigmund Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2007. "Moral Agency, Profits and the Firm: Economic Revisions to the Friedman Theorem," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 209-220, January.
    12. Frank Krysiak, 2009. "Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 483-492, April.
    13. Andrew Marshall & Pauline Weetman, 2007. "Modelling Transparency in Disclosure: The Case of Foreign Exchange Risk Management," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5‐6), pages 705-739, June.
    14. Cristina Santini & Alessio Cavicchi & Leonardo Casini, 2013. "Sustainability in the wine industry: key questions and research trends a," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    16. Andrew L. Friedman & Samantha Miles, 2002. "Developing Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raden Pujiyono & Marimin & Arif Imam Suroso & Setiadi Djohar, 2025. "An ESG-Oriented Sustainable Business Model for Paint Industry Supply Chain in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-34, April.
    2. Xin Xie & Shaokang Wu & Ghulam Subhani & Sakina, 2025. "Analyzing how digital orientation contributes to organizational innovation and environmental, social and governance performance through digital inclusion and capabilities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Carla Vivas & Susana Leal & João A. M. Nascimento & Luís Cláudio Barradas & Sandra Oliveira, 2025. "Aligning Values for Impact: A Value Mapping Tool Applied to Social Innovation for Sustainable Business Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Francesco Albergo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Social media to disseminate circular economy information. An empirical analysis on Twitter," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 528-539, January.
    2. Iatridis, George, 2012. "Hedging and earnings management in the light of IFRS implementation: Evidence from the UK stock market," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 21-35.
    3. Elshandidy, Tamer & Fraser, Ian & Hussainey, Khaled, 2015. "What drives mandatory and voluntary risk reporting variations across Germany, UK and US?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 376-394.
    4. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Hussainey, Khaled & Nawaz, Tasawar & Ntim, Collins & Elamer, Ahmed, 2022. "A systematic literature review on risk disclosure research: State-of-the-art and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. André Luiz Romano & Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira & Sandra Sofia F. S. Caeiro, 2021. "Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Bamber, Matthew & McMeeking, Kevin & Petrovic, Nikola, 2018. "Mandatory Financial Reporting Processes and Outcomes," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 227-245.
    7. Moumen, Néjia & Ben Othman, Hakim & Hussainey, Khaled, 2015. "The value relevance of risk disclosure in annual reports: Evidence from MENA emerging markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 177-204.
    8. Ott, Christian, 2020. "The risks of mergers and acquisitions—Analyzing the incentives for risk reporting in Item 1A of 10-K filings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 158-181.
    9. Hassanein, Ahmed, 2022. "Risk reporting and stock return in the UK: Does market competition Matter?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg & Markus Hang & Andreas W. Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl & Matthias Walter, 2018. "What do we really know about corporate hedging? A meta-analytical study," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, February.
    11. Constantinescu Raluca & Muntean Denisa-Roxana, 2022. "Circular economy: adopting new green trends in marketing for a sustainable consumer experience based on Internet of Things," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 1447-1455, August.
    12. Miihkinen, Antti, 2012. "What Drives Quality of Firm Risk Disclosure?," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 437-468.
    13. Leonardo Fernandes & António Miguel Rosado da Cruz & Estrela Ferreira Cruz & Sérgio Ivan Lopes, 2023. "A Review on Adopting Blockchain and IoT Technologies for Fostering the Circular Economy in the Electrical and Electronic Equipment Value Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Miihkinen, Antti, 2013. "The usefulness of firm risk disclosures under different firm riskiness, investor-interest, and market conditions: New evidence from Finland," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 312-331.
    15. Amna Farrukh & Sanjay Mathrani & Aymen Sajjad, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review on Environmental Sustainability Issues of Flexible Packaging: Potential Pathways for Academic Research and Managerial Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Ignacio Ferrero & W. Michael Hoffman & Robert E. McNulty, 2012. "Must Milton Friedman Embrace Stakeholder Theory?," Faculty Working Papers 10/12, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.
    17. Suham Cahyono & Iman Harymawan & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Abu Hanifa Md. Noman, 2024. "Corporate business strategy, CEO's managerial ability, and environmental disclosure: The perspective of stakeholder theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8149-8189, December.
    18. Abraham, Santhosh & Shrives, Philip J., 2014. "Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 91-107.
    19. Neungho Han & Juneho Um, 2024. "Risk management strategy for supply chain sustainability and resilience capability," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Lyton Chithambo & Ishmael Tingbani & Godfred Afrifa Agyapong & Ernest Gyapong & Isaac Sakyi Damoah, 2020. "Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1666-1683, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5015-:d:1413495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.