IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5597-d1104493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nexuses among Green Supply Chain Management, Green Human Capital, Managerial Environmental Knowledge, and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country

Author

Listed:
  • Naila Nureen

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Da Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Muhammad Irfan

    (School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Faculty of Management Sciences, Department of Business Administration, ILMA University, Karachi 75190, Pakistan)

  • Maida Malik

    (The NUST Business School, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Usama Awan

    (Center for Research on Digitalization & Sustainability, Inland Norway Business School, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2212 Kongsvinger, Norway)

Abstract

The growing pressures from the government, buyers, consumers, suppliers, and the general public have recently compelled manufacturing firms to enhance their production methods by becoming more environmentally friendly and pursuing new innovative methods for producing green goods in developing countries. However, the relationship between green supply chain management (GSCM), green human capital (GHC), green innovation (GIN), managerial environmental knowledge (MEK), and firm performance (FPR) has received only a minimal amount of research focus. This study addresses this research gap by providing empirical evidence to motivate firms to implement GSCM, GHC, GIN, and MEK to enhance their FPR in developing countries substantially. A conceptual framework was developed to connect the concepts mentioned above. A questionnaire-based survey was used to collect the data. A total of 736 respondents from manufacturing firms in China were selected. Utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM), the data were analyzed. The findings indicate that neither GHC nor GSCM directly affects FPR; rather, GIN mediates the connection between GHC, GSCM, and FPR. In addition, the findings showed that MEK directly affects FPR and moderates the link between GIN and FPR. This study examined several theoretical and managerial implications and expanded research in the related fields. The results may help practitioners and managers comprehend how GSCM practices impact GIN and FPR. The outcomes of this research will benefit experts, policy makers, and stakeholders who seek to encourage FPR enhancements.

Suggested Citation

  • Naila Nureen & Da Liu & Muhammad Irfan & Maida Malik & Usama Awan, 2023. "Nexuses among Green Supply Chain Management, Green Human Capital, Managerial Environmental Knowledge, and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5597-:d:1104493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rehman, Shafique Ur & Kraus, Sascha & Shah, Syed Asim & Khanin, Dmitry & Mahto, Raj V., 2021. "Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan & Hotlan Siagian & Ferry Jie, 2021. "Impact of Enhanced Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) on Firm Performance through Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Christoph G. Schmidt & Kai Foerstl & Birte Schaltenbrand, 2017. "The Supply Chain Position Paradox: Green Practices and Firm Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(1), pages 3-25, January.
    4. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Walsh & Daniel Lerner & Markus A. Fitza & Qiaohua Li, 2018. "Green Innovation, Managerial Concern and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 39-51, January.
    5. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    6. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Giudice, Manlio Del & Chierici, Roberto & Graziano, Domenico, 2020. "Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Xu, Lu & Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning, 2021. "Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Arshian Sharif & Hêriş Golpîra & Anil Kumar, 2019. "A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 1063-1075, November.
    9. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 271-286, February.
    10. Md. Ahashan Habib & Yukun Bao & Nurun Nabi & Marzia Dulal & Asma Ansary Asha & Mazedul Islam, 2021. "Impact of Strategic Orientations on the Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Soh Hyun Chu & Hongsuk Yang & Mansokku Lee & Sangwook Park, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Wu, Haitao & Xu, Lina & Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Yan, Guoyao, 2020. "How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Lucianetti, Lorenzo & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Latan, Hengky, 2018. "Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: Effects on organizational measurement systems and firms' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 318-328.
    14. Wenhao Song & Hongyan Yu, 2018. "Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 135-150, March.
    15. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Utilize structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the influence of corporate environmental ethics: the mediation effect of green human capital," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 79-95, January.
    16. Usama Awan, 2019. "Effects of buyer-supplier relationship on social performance improvement and innovation performance improvement," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 21-35.
    17. Kanwal Iqbal Khan & Zwaid Babar & Sumaira Sharif & Suhaira Iqbal & Maryum Iqbal Khan, 2021. "Going green? Investigating the role of GSCM practices on firm financial and environmental performance through green innovation," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(6), pages 681-701.
    18. Xiaofeng Su & Anxin Xu & Wenhe Lin & Youcheng Chen & Songtao Liu & Wenxing Xu, 2020. "Environmental Leadership, Green Innovation Practices, Environmental Knowledge Learning, and Firm Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    19. Sreen, Naman & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Tan, Teck Ming & Alharbi, Fatimah, 2021. "Behavioral reasoning perspectives to brand love toward natural products: Moderating role of environmental concern and household size," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    20. Deng, Ping & Lu, Shiqing & Xiao, Hanbin, 2013. "Evaluation of the relevance measure between ports and regional economy using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 123-133.
    21. Xiangzhi Bu & Wilson V.T. Dang & Jianming Wang & Qiu Liu, 2020. "Environmental Orientation, Green Supply Chain Management, and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    22. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    23. Xiang Ma & Young-Seok Ock & Fengpei Wu & Zhenyang Zhang, 2022. "The Effect of Internal Control on Green Innovation: Corporate Environmental Investment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    24. Bilal Ahmad & Liu Da & Mirza Huzaifa Asif & Muhammad Irfan & Shahid Ali & Muhammad Imad Ud Din Akbar, 2021. "Understanding the Antecedents and Consequences of Service-Sales Ambidexterity: A Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    25. Sharif, Arshian & Raza, Syed Ali & Ozturk, Ilhan & Afshan, Sahar, 2019. "The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: A global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 685-691.
    26. Chao Hung Wang & Wei‐Jr Juo, 2021. "An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3241-3254, November.
    27. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 107-119, August.
    28. Min Xue & Francis Boadu & Yu Xie, 2019. "The Penetration of Green Innovation on Firm Performance: Effects of Absorptive Capacity and Managerial Environmental Concern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junheng Cheng & Weiyi Hong & Jingya Cheng, 2023. "Optimal Green Input Level for a Capital-Constrained Supply Chain Considering Disruption Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Saqib Mehmood & Jianqiang Fan & Idris Salim Dokota & Samera Nazir & Zarish Nazir, 2024. "How to Manage Supply Chains Successfully in Transport Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenjie Li & Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Idrees Waris & Tianyang Hu, 2023. "The Nexus between Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Intellectual Capital and Green Innovation towards Business Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Automobile Manufactur," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Burcu Özgül & Cemal Zehir, 2023. "How Managers’ Green Transformational Leadership Affects a Firm’s Environmental Strategy, Green Innovation, and Performance: The Moderating Impact of Differentiation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Zhang Xiaoyi & Hailan Yang & Nilesh Kumar & Maqsood H. Bhutto & Wang Kun & Tianyang Hu, 2023. "Assessing Chinese Textile and Apparel Industry Business Sustainability: The Role of Organization Green Culture, Green Dynamic Capabilities, and Green Innovation in Relation to Environmental Orientatio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Hien Vo Van & Tu Thanh Hoai & Nha Nguyen Minh & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2023. "Green Transformational Leadership and Green Mindfulness as Contributors to Green Innovation and Environmental Performance: Evidence From Manufacturing Firms in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    6. Mercedes Úbeda‐García & Bartolome Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio C. Zaragoza‐Sáez & Encarnación Manresa‐Marhuenda & Esther Poveda‐Pareja, 2022. "Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 32-45, January.
    7. Tang Meirun & Lahcene Makhloufi & Mohamad Ghozali Hassan, 2020. "Environmental Outcomes of Green Entrepreneurship Harmonization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Morteza Akbari & Hamid Padash & Zahra Shahabaldini Parizi & Haniye Rezaei & Elmira Shahriari & Ala Khosravani, 2022. "A bibliometric review of green innovation research: identifying knowledge domain and network," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3993-4023, December.
    9. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Hassane Gharbi & Ahmed M. Hasanein & Ahmed E. Abu Elnasr, 2022. "The Mediating Effects of Green Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibility on the Link between Transformational Leadership and Performance: An Examination Using SEM Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Xinyue Hao & Fanglin Chen & Zhongfei Chen, 2022. "Does green innovation increase enterprise value?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1232-1247, March.
    11. Xiaoyang Xu & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Ayaz & Sonia Lohana, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation with Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Financial, and Environmental Performance: The Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Lu Zheng & Konstantinos Iatridis, 2022. "Friends or foes? A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis of the relationship between eco‐innovation and firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1838-1855, May.
    13. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shireenjit K. Johl, 2021. "Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2922-2936, November.
    14. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    15. Achi, Awele & Adeola, Ogechi & Achi, Francis Chukwuedo, 2022. "CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: Moderating role of perceived environmental volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 771-781.
    16. Ayman wael AL-Khatib & Ahmed Shuhaiber, 2022. "Green Intellectual Capital and Green Supply Chain Performance: Does Big Data Analytics Capabilities Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Zahid Yousaf & Magdalena Radulescu & Crenguta Sinisi & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar, 2022. "How Do Firms Achieve Green Innovation? Investigating the Influential Factors among the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Syed Muhammad Fazal‐e‐Hasan & Hormoz Ahmadi & Harjit Sekhon & Gary Mortimer & Mohd Sadiq & Husni Kharouf & Muhammad Abid, 2023. "The role of green innovation and hope in employee retention," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 220-239, January.
    19. Yuan Li & Nan Huang & Yang Zhao, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Enterprise Green Economic Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    20. Sha, Yezhou & Zhang, Ping & Wang, Yiru & Xu, Yifan, 2022. "Capital market opening and green innovation——Evidence from Shanghai-Hong Kong stock connect and the Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5597-:d:1104493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.