IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i1p340-d473663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Strategic Orientations on the Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Ahashan Habib

    (Department of Textile Engineering Management, Bangladesh University of Textiles, Tejgaon, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh)

  • Yukun Bao

    (Center for Modern Information Management, School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Nurun Nabi

    (Department of Textile Engineering Management, Bangladesh University of Textiles, Tejgaon, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh
    Department of Business administration, School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Marzia Dulal

    (Department of Textile Engineering Management, Bangladesh University of Textiles, Tejgaon, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh)

  • Asma Ansary Asha

    (Department of Textile Engineering Management, Bangladesh University of Textiles, Tejgaon, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh)

  • Mazedul Islam

    (Department of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

Ensuring sustainability through green supply chain management practices has become challenging for the textiles and garments industry. Organizations need to examine the factors of the firm’s sustainability performance and how to manage them strategically. Hence, the strategic organizational orientation can be the best approach for implementing green supply chain management (GSCM) practices to improve firm sustainability performance. This study aims to assess the impact of strategic orientation in three dimensions, such as green entrepreneurial orientation (GEO), market orientation (MO), and knowledge management orientation (KMO) on the implementation of green supply chain management (GSCM) practices and the subsequently sustainable firm performance. Data were gathered from an extensive scale survey of 266 respondents of textile manufacturing firms in Bangladesh. Data were analyzed in the structural equation model (SEM) with partial least squares techniques to justify the proposed hypotheses. The results reveal that GEO and MO have a significant positive effect on GSCM practices, affecting sustainable firm performance. Surprisingly, KMO does not have a positive impact on GSCM practices. Further, this study reveals that GSCM practices partially mediate the relationship between GEO and sustainable firm performance while MO and KMO partially mediate the relationship between GEO and GSCM practices. Overall, findings help textiles firm management comprehensively understand the implementation strategies of GSCM practices in operations and reconfigure accordingly in the competitive business environment while improving firm performances. This study is the first to investigate the effect of strategic orientation on GSCM practices implementation in the textiles industry from the context of an upstream operation with a comprehensive understanding of the factors while reducing environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Ahashan Habib & Yukun Bao & Nurun Nabi & Marzia Dulal & Asma Ansary Asha & Mazedul Islam, 2021. "Impact of Strategic Orientations on the Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:340-:d:473663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/340/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/340/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas C. Powell, 2001. "Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 875-888, September.
    2. Md. Ahashan Habib & Yukun Bao & Aboobucker Ilmudeen, 2020. "The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and green supply chain management practices on sustainable firm performance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1743616-174, January.
    3. Soh Hyun Chu & Hongsuk Yang & Mansokku Lee & Sangwook Park, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Pasi Syrjä & Kaisu Puumalainen & Helena Sjögrén & Juha Soininen & Susanne Durst, 2019. "Entrepreneurial orientation in firms with a social mission - a mixed-methods approach," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1602016-160, January.
    5. Natasha Evers & Gabriela Gliga & Alex Rialp-Criado, 2019. "Strategic orientation pathways in international new ventures and born global firms—Towards a research agenda," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 287-304, September.
    6. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2014. "The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 39-47.
    7. Jeffrey G. Covin & Dennis P. Slevin & Randall L. Schultz, 1994. "Implementing Strategic Missions: Effective Strategic, Structural And Tactical Choices," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 481-506, July.
    8. Gautam Ahuja & Curba Morris Lampert, 2001. "Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 521-543, June.
    9. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    10. Todeschini, Bruna Villa & Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira & Callegaro-de-Menezes, Daniela & Ghezzi, Antonio, 2017. "Innovative and sustainable business models in the fashion industry: Entrepreneurial drivers, opportunities, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 759-770.
    11. Frambach, R.T. & Prabhu, J.C. & Verhallen, T.M.M., 2003. "The influence of business strategy on new product activity : The role of market orientation," Other publications TiSEM 64c2e300-9f26-4178-ba34-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Korrakot Yaibuathet Tippayawong & Natananot Niyomyat & Apichat Sopadang & Sakgasem Ramingwong, 2016. "Factors Affecting Green Supply Chain Operational Performance of the Thai Auto Parts Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.
    13. Shanyong Wang & Jun Li & Dingtao Zhao, 2018. "Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Practices: The Moderating Effects of Environmental Commitment and Resource Availability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 52-69, January.
    14. Minhaj Ahemad Abdul Rehman & Rakesh L. Shrivastava, 2011. "An Innovative Approach To Evaluate Green Supply Chain Management (Gscm) Drivers By Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (Ism)," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(02), pages 315-336.
    15. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    16. Andreas Rauch & Johan Wiklund & G.T. Lumpkin & Michael Frese, 2009. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 761-787, May.
    17. Amir Forouharfar & Seyed Aligholi Rowshan & Habibollah Salarzehi, 2019. "Social entrepreneurship strategic grid: Visualizing classification, orientation and dimensionality in the strategic paradigms of governmental-scale social entrepreneurship (A literature-based approach," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1644714-164, January.
    18. Teece, David J., 2016. "Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 202-216.
    19. Richard R. Nelson, 1991. "Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S2), pages 61-74, December.
    20. Yadlapalli, Aswini & Rahman, Shams & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2018. "Socially responsible governance mechanisms for manufacturing firms in apparel supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 135-149.
    21. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    22. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    23. Scott L. Newbert, 2007. "Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-146, February.
    24. Johanna Gast & Katherine Gundolf & Beate Cesinger, 2017. "Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02008555, HAL.
    25. Bylon Abeeku Bamfo & Jerry Jay Kraa, 2019. "Market orientation and performance of small and medium enterprises in Ghana: The mediating role of innovation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1605703-160, January.
    26. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen & Spender, JC & Groen, Aard, 2009. "The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques," MPRA Paper 21442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    27. Ahashan Habib & Yukun Bao, 2019. "Impact of knowledge management capability and green supply chain management practices on firm performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(6), pages 240-255, October.
    28. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    29. Pacheco, Desirée F. & Dean, Thomas J. & Payne, David S., 2010. "Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 464-480, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ameer, Farah & Khan, Naveed R., 2023. "Green entrepreneurial orientation and corporate environmental performance: A systematic literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 755-778.
    2. Ahashan Habib & Yukun Bao, 2019. "Impact of knowledge management capability and green supply chain management practices on firm performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(6), pages 240-255, October.
    3. Nabila Abid & Federica Ceci & Junaid Aftab, 2024. "Attaining sustainable business performance under resource constraints: Insights from an emerging economy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2031-2048, June.
    4. Samuel Adomako, 2018. "The Moderating Effects Of Adaptive And Intellectual Resource Capabilities On The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation And Financial Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-35, April.
    5. Byungjoo Paek & Heesang Lee, 2018. "Strategic entrepreneurship and competitive advantage of established firms: evidence from the digital TV industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 883-925, December.
    6. Farhad Uddin Ahmed & Mujahid Mohiuddin Babu & Md Nafizur Rahman & Mohammad Jasim Uddin & Bidit Lal Dey, 2025. "Strategic orientation, strategic renewal, and the international performance of born global firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 993-1024, June.
    7. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen & Spender, JC & Groen, Aard, 2009. "The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques," MPRA Paper 21442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Eungdo Kim & InGyu Lee & Hongbum Kim & Kwangsoo Shin, 2021. "Factors Affecting Outbound Open Innovation Performance in Bio-Pharmaceutical Industry-Focus on Out-Licensing Deals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    10. Michael Sheppard, 2020. "The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 195-219, March.
    11. Vinicius Minatogawa & Matheus Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Maria Holgado & Diego Garrido & Hernan Pinto & Ruy Quadros, 2022. "Towards Systematic Sustainable Business Model Innovation: What Can We Learn from Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-35, March.
    12. Baraldi, Enrico & Gressetvold, Espen & Harrison, Debbie, 2012. "Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 266-276.
    13. Dailin Alejandra Ramírez-Altamirano & Patricia S. Sánchez-Medina & René Díaz-Pichardo & Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza, 2024. "Transformational Environmental Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility as Triggers of Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Performance in Environmentally Certified Companies in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Dongmei Cao & Nigel Berkeley & Donald Finlay, 2014. "Measuring Sustained Competitive Advantage From Resource-based View: Survey of Chinese Clothing Industry," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(2), pages 1-89, February.
    15. Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar & Mike Wright & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2018. "Sector-Based Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Promise of Sector Studies in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-23, January.
    16. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Richard Arend, 2014. "Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 33-57, January.
    18. Eleftherios Kourtis & Michael Kourtis & Panayiotis Curtis & Michael Hanias, 2022. "Sustainable Business Growth, Value Creation and Dynamic Competitive Advantage: The Greek Pharmaceutical Industry," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 46-79.
    19. Ferreira, João J.M. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F., 2022. "What makes organizations unique? Looking inside the box," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 664-674.
    20. Mohammed Taj Hejazi & Bader Al Batati & Ahmed Bahurmuz, 2023. "The Influence of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Corporate Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:340-:d:473663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.