IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3381-d1066417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Differences, Dynamic Evolution and Driving Factors Analysis of PM 2.5 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Weiguang Wang

    (School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Yangyang Wang

    (School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

Abstract

The proposal of a “dual-carbon” goal puts forward higher requirements for air pollution control. Identifying the spatial-temporal characteristics, regional differences, dynamic evolution, and driving factors of PM 2.5 are the keys to formulating targeted haze reduction measures and ameliorating air quality. Therefore, adopting the Dagum Gini Coefficient and its decomposition method, the Kernel Density Estimation model, and spatial quantile regression model, this study analyzes the regional differences, dynamic evolution, and driving factors of PM 2.5 concentrations (PM 2.5 ) in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) and the upstream, midstream, and downstream (the three regions) from 2003 to 2018. The study shows that: (1) PM 2.5 in the YREB was characterized by increasing first and then decreasing, with evident heterogeneity and spatial agglomeration characteristics. (2) Inter-regional differences and intensity of trans-variation were the primary sources of PM 2.5 differences. (3) The density curve of PM 2.5 shifted to the left in the YREB and the upstream, midstream, and midstream, suggesting that PM 2.5 has declined. (4) Industrial service level (IS) and financial expenditure scale (FES) exerted a significant and negative effect on PM 2.5 across the quantiles. On the contrary, population density (PD) showed a significant and positive influence. Except for the 75th quantile, the technology level (TEC) significantly inhibited PM 2.5 . The remaining variables had a heterogeneous impact on PM 2.5 at different quantiles. The above results suggest that regional joint prevention and control mechanisms, collaborative governance mechanisms, and comprehensive policy mix mechanisms should be established to cope with PM 2.5 pollution and achieve green, sustainable economic development of the YREB.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiguang Wang & Yangyang Wang, 2023. "Regional Differences, Dynamic Evolution and Driving Factors Analysis of PM 2.5 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3381-:d:1066417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin-Wei Yan & Fei Tao & Shuai-Qian Zhang & Shuang Lin & Tong Zhou, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Driving Forces of PM2.5 in Three Urban Agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    3. Mao Mao & Haofei Sun & Xiaolin Zhang, 2020. "Air Pollution Characteristics and Health Risks in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China during Winter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Yang, Yuan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2014. "Industrial CO2 intensity, indigenous innovation and R&D spillovers in China’s provinces," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 117-127.
    5. Wang, Mingwei & Che, Yue & Yang, Kai & Wang, Min & Xiong, Lijun & Huang, Yuchi, 2011. "A local-scale low-carbon plan based on the STIRPAT model and the scenario method: The case of Minhang District, Shanghai, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 6981-6990.
    6. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "How industrialization and urbanization process impacts on CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from nonparametric additive regression models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 188-202.
    7. Cai-Rong Lou & Hong-Yu Liu & Yu-Feng Li & Yu-Ling Li, 2016. "Socioeconomic Drivers of PM 2.5 in the Accumulation Phase of Air Pollution Episodes in the Yangtze River Delta of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Tang, Liwei & He, Gang, 2021. "How to improve total factor energy efficiency? An empirical analysis of the Yangtze River economic belt of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Qing Zhao & Chih-Hung Yuan, 2020. "Did Haze Pollution Harm the Quality of Economic Development?—An Empirical Study Based on China’s PM2.5 Concentrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Liangjun Su & Zhenlin Yang, 2007. "Instrumental Variable Quantile Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models," Development Economics Working Papers 22476, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    11. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hansen, Christian, 2006. "Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 491-525, June.
    12. Zhu, Bangzhu & Zhang, Mengfan & Zhou, Yanhua & Wang, Ping & Sheng, Jichuan & He, Kaijian & Wei, Yi-Ming & Xie, Rui, 2019. "Exploring the effect of industrial structure adjustment on interprovincial green development efficiency in China: A novel integrated approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Senlin Hu & Gang Zeng & Xianzhong Cao & Huaxi Yuan & Bing Chen, 2021. "Does Technological Innovation Promote Green Development? A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Luo, Zhi & Wan, Guanghua & Wang, Chen & Zhang, Xun, 2018. "Urban pollution and road infrastructure: A case study of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 171-183.
    15. Tan, Shukui & Hu, Bixia & Kuang, Bing & Zhou, Min, 2021. "Regional differences and dynamic evolution of urban land green use efficiency within the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Dagum, Camilo, 1997. "A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 515-531.
    17. Quah, D., 1990. "Galton'S Fallacy And The Tests Of The Convergence Hypothesis," Working papers 552, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
    18. Subodh Kumar & R. Robert Russell, 2002. "Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(3), pages 527-548, June.
    19. J. Paul Elhorst, 2003. "Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 244-268, July.
    20. Yang Li & Hua Shao & Nan Jiang & Ge Shi & Xin Cheng, 2018. "The Evolution of the Urban Spatial Pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Kostov & Julie Le Gallo, 2015. "Convergence: A Story of Quantiles and Spillovers," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 552-576, November.
    2. Lijuan Huo & Tae-Hwan Kim & Yunmi Kim, 2015. "Revisiting growth empirics based on IV panel quantile regression," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(36), pages 3859-3873, August.
    3. You, Jianmin & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "How heterogeneous technological progress promotes industrial structure upgrading and industrial carbon efficiency? Evidence from China's industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Danqing Chen & Jianbao Chen & Shuangshuang Li, 2021. "Instrumental Variable Quantile Regression of Spatial Dynamic Durbin Panel Data Model with Fixed Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Jiawen Zhang & Zhenhua Xu & Fuyi Ci, 2023. "Spatio–Temporal Evolutionary Features and Drivers of Green Competitiveness of Cities Surrounding the Yellow River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Senhua Huang & Lingming Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Urban Total-Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from 275 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Zhao, Feifei & Hu, Zheng & Yi, Ping & Zhao, Xu, 2024. "Does environmental decentralization improve industrial ecology? Evidence from China's Yangtze River Economic Belt," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1250-1270.
    8. Ragdad Cani Miranti, 2021. "Is regional poverty converging across Indonesian districts? A distribution dynamics and spatial econometric approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 851-883, October.
    9. Paul Contoyannis & Jinhu Li, 2017. "The dynamics of adolescent depression: an instrumental variable quantile regression with fixed effects approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 907-922, June.
    10. Zhang, Hui & Zhou, Peng & Sun, Xiumei & Ni, Guanqun, 2024. "Disparities in energy efficiency and its determinants in Chinese cities: From the perspective of heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    11. Ningyi Liu & Yongyu Wang, 2022. "Urban Agglomeration Ecological Welfare Performance and Spatial Convergence Research in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Carlos Lamarche, 2013. "Industry-wide work rules and productivity: evidence from Argentine union contract data," IZA Journal of Labor & Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Oleg Badunenko & Diego Romero-�vila, 2014. "Productivity Growth across Spanish Regions and Industries: A Production-Frontier Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 1242-1262, July.
    14. Xiaorong Yang & Jia Chen & Degui Li & Runze Li, 2024. "Functional-Coefficient Quantile Regression for Panel Data with Latent Group Structure," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 1026-1040, July.
    15. Xiaowen Dai & Libin Jin, 2021. "Minimum distance quantile regression for spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Stephen Matthews & Daniel M. Parker, 2013. "Progress in Spatial Demography," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(10), pages 271-312.
    17. Denis Chetverikov & Bradley Larsen & Christopher Palmer, 2016. "IV Quantile Regression for Group‐Level Treatments, With an Application to the Distributional Effects of Trade," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 809-833, March.
    18. Valizadeh, Pourya & Smith, Travis A., "undated". "How Did the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Impact the Material Well-being of SNAP Participants? A Distributional Approach," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258496, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Fenfen Wei & Nanping Feng & Kevin H. Zhang, 2017. "Innovation Capability and Innovation Talents: Evidence from China Based on a Quantile Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Gilles Dufrenot & Valerie Mignon & Charalambos Tsangarides, 2010. "The trade-growth nexus in the developing countries: a quantile regression approach," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 146(4), pages 731-761, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3381-:d:1066417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.