IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16308-d1287764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of China’s High-Quality Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Tianhao Yang

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Guofeng Gu

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

Combining an indicator system developed based on existence–relatedness–growth (ERG) needs and multiple weighting approaches, this paper evaluates the level of high-quality economic development (HQED) in Chinese provinces from the perspective of human well-being from 2007 to 2020. Spatial analysis, Dagum’s Gini coefficient (DGC), and spatial econometric modeling were employed to investigate the spatial–temporal evolutionary characteristics, regional differentiation, and driving factors of HQED in China. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) During the period of 2007–2019, the level of Chinese HQED showed a stable upward trend, and gradually produced the development characteristics of “only super power and multi-great power” and spatial features of “point, line and plane”, with Beijing as the absolute leader, the southeastern coastal region as the advantageous belt, and the relatively advantageous plane in central and western areas with Shaanxi as the core. (2) The degree of spatial differentiation in Chinese provincial HQED narrowed year by year, with intra-regional differentiation organized as follows: eastern > northeastern > western > central; inter-regional differentiation was concentrated in the development gaps across the other three major regions and the eastern areas. (3) Chinese provincial HQED had a significant spatial autocorrelation characteristic, which was further revealed by the spatial Durbin model (SDM) to be a siphon effect at the national and regional levels, i.e., the plundering of the resources and development opportunities of weaker provinces by stronger ones. (4) Driving factors such as economic scale, urbanization level, resource endowment, government size, green technological innovation, industrial structure upgrading, and environmental regulations affected HQED at the national level and in the four major regions to varying degrees. These findings could contribute to policymakers’ efforts to design targeted regional development policies during the transition period of China’s economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianhao Yang & Guofeng Gu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of China’s High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16308-:d:1287764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanaka, Kenta & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Industrial agglomeration effect for energy efficiency in Japanese production plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Zhao Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Green Finance on High-Quality Economic Development in China: Vertical Fiscal Imbalance as the Moderating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    4. Robert Barro, 2002. "Quantity and Quality of Economic Growth," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Norman Loayza & Raimundo Soto & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series Editor) (ed.),Economic Growth: Sources, Trends, and Cycles, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 5, pages 135-162, Central Bank of Chile.
    5. Kubiszewski, Ida & Costanza, Robert & Franco, Carol & Lawn, Philip & Talberth, John & Jackson, Tim & Aylmer, Camille, 2013. "Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 57-68.
    6. Winton Bates, 2009. "Gross national happiness," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 23(2), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Guo, Jie & Sun, Zixu, 2023. "How does manufacturing agglomeration affect high-quality economic development in China?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 673-691.
    8. Dagum, Camilo, 1997. "A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 515-531.
    9. Chen, Binkai & Lin, Justin Yifu, 2021. "Development strategy, resource misallocation and economic performance," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 612-634.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Tong & Lu Tang, 2025. "Regional Differences and Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Digital Economy Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O'Donnell, Gus & Oswald, Andrew J., 2015. "National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 59-70.
    2. Nicole Palan, 2010. "Measurement of Specialization – The Choice of Indices," FIW Working Paper series 062, FIW.
    3. Hao, Yu & Guo, Yunxia & Li, Suixin & Luo, Shiyue & Jiang, Xueting & Shen, Zhiyang & Wu, Haitao, 2022. "Towards achieving the sustainable development goal of industry: How does industrial agglomeration affect air pollution?," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    4. Thierry Warin & Sarah Elimam, 2025. "GDP 5.0: Real-Time, Micro-Founded and Sustainable Metrics for Beyond-GDP Economic Assessment," CIRANO Working Papers 2025s-20, CIRANO.
    5. Jiaqing Zhang & Ziyan Chen & Biqiao Hu & Daolin Zhu, 2024. "Do Regional Integration Policies Promote Integrated Urban–Rural Development? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Anhui Guo & Limin Han & Shan Zheng, 2024. "How does industrial agglomeration affect green innovation efficiency in high-tech industries?—Evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30771-30796, December.
    7. Bo Qin & Dongmei Zeng & Angang Gao, 2022. "Convergence effect of the Belt and Road Initiative on income disparity: evidence from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Shengyun Wang & Yaxin Zhang & Xingren Yao, 2021. "Research on Spatial Unbalance and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Wen, Yuyuan & Yu, Zilong & Xue, Jingjing & Liu, Yang, 2024. "How heterogeneous industrial agglomeration impacts energy efficiency subject to technological innovation:Evidence from the spatial threshold model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Lu, Hao & Fan, Yiwei & Jiao, Liudan & Wu, Ya, 2024. "Assessment and spatial effect of urban agglomeration business environments: A case study of two urban agglomerations in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Yafei Wang & Luyao Zhang & Jing Yan & Shiyuan Cheng & Junnan Liu & Min Zhong, 2025. "How the “Village Merger and Resettlement” Policy Reshapes Agricultural Carbon Emissions: An Analysis of Effects and Mechanisms from Chinese Rural Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-33, February.
    12. Cao, Sheng & Xu, Haicheng & Xu, Yan & Wang, Xiaoshen & Zheng, Yingjie & Li, Yanling, 2023. "Assessment of the integrated benefits of highway infrastructure and analysis of the spatiotemporal variation: Evidence from 29 provinces in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Wang, Song & Yang, Canyu & Hou, Dailing & Dai, Liang, 2023. "How do urban agglomerations drive economic development? A policy implementation and spatial effects perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1224-1238.
    14. Jinhuang Mao & Zhenyu Wang & Tianyang Ma, 2023. "Dynamic Evolution of High-Quality Economic Development Levels: Regional Differences and Distribution in West China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Tonghui Yu & Xuan Huang & Shanshan Jia & Xufeng Cui, 2023. "Unveiling the Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Key Drivers for Urban Green High-Quality Development: A Comparative Analysis of China’s Five Major Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    17. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    18. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    19. Sidney Turner & Richard Turner, 2011. "Capital cities: a special case in urban development," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(1), pages 19-35, February.
    20. Agarwalla, Astha, 2011. "Agglomeration Economies and Productivity Growth in India," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-01-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16308-:d:1287764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.