IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p9299-d628285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Spatial Unbalance and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shengyun Wang

    (Research Center of the Central China for Economic and Social Development, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
    School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Yaxin Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Xingren Yao

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

Abstract

Ecological well-being performance (EWP) is central to achieving coordinated and sustainable economic and social development and environmental protection. This study constructed an evaluation index system of EWP, measured the EWP of 30 Chinese provinces or cities from 1997 to 2018 using the super-efficiency slack-based model (Super-SBM), and analyzed the spatial and temporal evolutionary characteristics of EWP. Under the division of four regions and eight regions, the Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition is applied to analyze the regional differences and sources of differences in EWP in China. Then, the Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) model analyzes the factors influencing EWP. Results show that the inter-provincial differences in EWP in China are significant, with the eastern region having significantly higher EWP than the western, central, and northeastern regions. From 1997 to 2018, the overall spatial differences in EWP in China decreased. The four regions and eight regions show that reducing inter-regional differences is the key to mitigating regional unbalance in China. Urbanization significantly enhances EWP in China and the degree of openness and industrial structure has a significant heterogeneous effect on EWP. Therefore, future policy formulation should focus on transforming the economic development model, promoting coordinated regional development, and exploring the optimal ways to improve EWP according to local conditions. This study aims to provide a scientific basis and reference for promoting sustainable regional economic and social development and improving the imbalance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengyun Wang & Yaxin Zhang & Xingren Yao, 2021. "Research on Spatial Unbalance and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9299-:d:628285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doloreux, David & Parto, Saeed, 2005. "Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 133-153.
    2. Kalimeris, Panos & Bithas, Kostas & Richardson, Clive & Nijkamp, Peter, 2020. "Hidden linkages between resources and economy: A “Beyond-GDP” approach using alternative welfare indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Amartya Sen & Joseph Stiglitz & Jean-Paul Fitoussi, 2010. "Mis-measuring our lives : why GDP doesn't add up?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03415632, HAL.
    4. McDonald, Garry W. & Patterson, Murray G., 2004. "Ecological Footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1-2), pages 49-67, September.
    5. Amartya Sen & Joseph Stiglitz & Jean-Paul Fitoussi, 2010. "Mis-measuring our lives : why GDP doesn't add up?," Post-Print hal-03415632, HAL.
    6. Olivier E. Malay, 2021. "How to Articulate Beyond GDP and Businesses’ Social and Environmental Indicators?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Jundong Hou & Xinxin Ruan & Jun Lv & Haixiang Guo, 2020. "Two-Stage Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Model to Assess China’s Ecological Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Herman E. Daly, 1991. "Towards an Environmental Macroeconomics," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 67(2), pages 255-259.
    9. Common, Mick, 2007. "Measuring national economic performance without using prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 92-102, October.
    10. Tao Liu & Jixia Li & Juan Chen & Shaolei Yang, 2019. "Urban Ecological Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors—A Case Study in Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Peter Victor, 2010. "Questioning economic growth," Nature, Nature, vol. 468(7322), pages 370-371, November.
    12. Kubiszewski, Ida & Costanza, Robert & Franco, Carol & Lawn, Philip & Talberth, John & Jackson, Tim & Aylmer, Camille, 2013. "Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 57-68.
    13. Madalina Dociu & Anca Dunarintu, 2012. "The Socio-Economic Impact of Urbanization," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 2(Special 1), pages 47-52, May.
    14. Yunhe Yin & Xiang Han & Shaohong Wu, 2017. "Spatial and Temporal Variations in the Ecological Footprints in Northwest China from 2005 to 2014," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Tang, Chor Foon & Tan, Bee Wah, 2015. "The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 447-454.
    16. Dagum, Camilo, 1997. "A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 515-531.
    17. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    18. Reinhard, Stijn & Knox Lovell, C. A. & Thijssen, Geert J., 2000. "Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 287-303, March.
    19. Daly, Herman E, 1974. "The Economics of the Steady State," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 15-21, May.
    20. Moran, Daniel D. & Wackernagel, Mathis & Kitzes, Justin A. & Goldfinger, Steven H. & Boutaud, Aurelien, 2008. "Measuring sustainable development -- Nation by nation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 470-474, January.
    21. Hickel, Jason, 2020. "The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    22. Haberl, Helmut & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Krausmann, Fridolin, 2001. "How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 25-45, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ling Bai & Tianran Guo & Wei Xu & Kang Luo, 2022. "The Spatial Differentiation and Driving Forces of Ecological Welfare Performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Xuhui Cong & Zhipeng Qi & Sai Wang & Peikun Su & Liang Wang & Jonas Šaparauskas & Jarosław Górecki & Miroslaw J. Skibniewski, 2023. "Ecological Welfare Performance Evaluation and Spatial–Temporal Difference Evolution of Blue Economic Zones: A Case Study of the Blue Economic Zone of Shandong Peninsula," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Chuansheng Wu & Yuyue Li & Lingling Qi, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Green Transformation on Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Case Study of 78 Cities in Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Kai Yuan & Biao Hu & Xinlong Li & Tingyun Niu & Liang Zhang, 2023. "Exploration of Coupling Effects in the Digital Economy and Eco-Economic System Resilience in Urban Areas: Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Jing Bian & Feng Lan & Zhao Hui & Jiamin Bai & Yuanping Wang, 2022. "Ecological Well-Being Performance Evaluation of Chinese Major Node Cities along the Belt and Road," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Jing Bian & Feng Lan & Yulin Zhou & Zhenzhen Peng & Mingfang Dong, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Urban Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Can Zhang & Jixia Li & Tengfei Liu & Mengzhi Xu & Huachun Wang & Xu Li, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Chinese Cities’ Ecological Welfare Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Lindong Ma & Yuanxiao Hong & Xihui Chen, 2022. "Can Green Economy and Ecological Welfare Achieve Synergistic Development? The Perspective of the “Two Mountains” Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Xiaoming Song & Ze Tian & Chenhui Ding & Chao Liu & Wei Wang & Ronggai Zhao & Yingchun Xing, 2022. "Digital Economy, Environmental Regulation, and Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Provincial Panel Data Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Feng Lan & Zhao Hui & Jing Bian & Ying Wang & Wenxin Shen, 2022. "Ecological Well-Being Performance Evaluation and Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Shengyun Wang & Liancheng Duan & Qin Zhu & Yaxin Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Differences of Ecological Well-Being Performance in the Poyang Lake Area at the Local Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Yuanyuan Zhu & Rui Zhang & Jiaxing Cui, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors in the Ecological Well-Being Performance of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Hierarchical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Shengyun Wang & Liancheng Duan & Shuwen Jiang, 2022. "Research on Spatial Differences and Driving Effects of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanyuan Zhu & Rui Zhang & Jiaxing Cui, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors in the Ecological Well-Being Performance of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Hierarchical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Ningyi Liu & Yongyu Wang, 2022. "Urban Agglomeration Ecological Welfare Performance and Spatial Convergence Research in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    4. Feng Lan & Zhao Hui & Jing Bian & Ying Wang & Wenxin Shen, 2022. "Ecological Well-Being Performance Evaluation and Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Lan Yao & Zhenning Yu & Mengya Wu & Jiachen Ning & Tiangui Lv, 2020. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Trend Prediction of Ecological Wellbeing Performance in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Shengyun Wang & Liancheng Duan & Shuwen Jiang, 2022. "Research on Spatial Differences and Driving Effects of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Chuansheng Wu & Yuyue Li & Lingling Qi, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Green Transformation on Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Case Study of 78 Cities in Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Amirmohsen Behjat & Mohammad Hassan Tarazkar, 2021. "Investigating the factors affecting the ecological well-being performance in Iran from 1994 to 2014," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13871-13889, September.
    9. Thomas Wiedmann & John Barrett, 2010. "A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-49, June.
    10. Ferng, Jiun-Jiun, 2014. "Nested open systems: An important concept for applying ecological footprint analysis to sustainable development assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 105-111.
    11. Jundong Hou & Xinxin Ruan & Jun Lv & Haixiang Guo, 2020. "Two-Stage Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Model to Assess China’s Ecological Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Bei He & Xiaoyun Du & Junkang Li & Dan Chen, 2023. "A Effectiveness-and Efficiency-Based Improved Approach for Measuring Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Shengyun Wang & Liancheng Duan & Qin Zhu & Yaxin Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Differences of Ecological Well-Being Performance in the Poyang Lake Area at the Local Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Jing Bian & Feng Lan & Zhao Hui & Jiamin Bai & Yuanping Wang, 2022. "Ecological Well-Being Performance Evaluation of Chinese Major Node Cities along the Belt and Road," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Jing Bian & Feng Lan & Yulin Zhou & Zhenzhen Peng & Mingfang Dong, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Urban Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Jóhannesson, S.E. & Davíðsdóttir, B. & Heinonen, J.T., 2018. "Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 370-380.
    17. Xiaoming Song & Ze Tian & Chenhui Ding & Chao Liu & Wei Wang & Ronggai Zhao & Yingchun Xing, 2022. "Digital Economy, Environmental Regulation, and Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Provincial Panel Data Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Yu Song & Dong Mei, 2022. "Sustainable development of China's regions from the perspective of ecological welfare performance: analysis based on GM(1,1) and the malmquist index," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1086-1115, January.
    19. Rosalia Castellano & Gabriella Bernardo & Gennaro Punzo, 2023. "Well-being in OECD countries: an assessment of technical and social efficiency using data envelopment analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(2), pages 141-176, June.
    20. Hardy, Daniel C. L., 2023. "Welfare, Autonomy, and Relative GDP," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 330, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9299-:d:628285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.