IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p432-d1016422.html

Structural Reform, Technological Progress and Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Dechao Han

    (Business School, Henan University of Science and Technology, 263 Kaiyuan Blvd., Luolong District, Luoyang 471023, China)

Abstract

Beneficial institutional environments help to improve TFP in manufacturing. However, it is unclear whether China’s structural reform has led to improvements in TFP in the manufacturing industry. In this study, Sys-GMM was employed to assess the relationships between structural reform, technological progress and manufacturing TFP using panel data from provincial-level administrative regions in China from 2010 to 2020. The results showed the following: (1) Structural reform induced a spiral-shaped upward trend of TFP by affecting the technological progress levels of enterprises in China, which was also enhanced by improvements in regional technology levels. (2) The impact of market-oriented reform on industrial TFP was similar to that of entire structural reform; however, innovation environments did not significantly impact industrial TFP, technological progress had no regulatory effect and although the reform and the supply of public services could significantly promote improvements in industrial TFP, technological progress also exhibited no significant regulatory effect on these improvements. (3) The flow of technology and labor significantly, positively correlated with industrial TFP, while resource idleness had a salient inhibitory effect. In addition, enhancement of the disclosed comparative advantage, as well as further opening and expansion of operation scales of the manufacturing industry, could improve industrial TFP even more.

Suggested Citation

  • Dechao Han, 2022. "Structural Reform, Technological Progress and Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:432-:d:1016422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Krugman & Anthony J. Venables, 1995. "Globalization and the Inequality of Nations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(4), pages 857-880.
    2. repec:fth:iniesr:430 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2002. "The determinants of national innovative capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 899-933, August.
    4. Barrell, Ray & Pain, Nigel, 1997. "The Growth of Foreign Direct Investment in Europe," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 160, pages 63-75, April.
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & Nicholas Bloom & William Kerr, 2018. "Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3450-3491, November.
    6. Hugo Pinto & João Guerreiro, 2010. "Innovation regional planning and latent dimensions: the case of the Algarve region," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(2), pages 315-329, April.
    7. Phu Nguyen-Van & Thi Kim Cuong Pham & Duc-Anh Le, 2019. "Productivity and public expenditure: a structural estimation for Vietnam’s provinces," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 95-120, February.
    8. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Peter J. Klenow, 2009. "Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(4), pages 1403-1448.
    9. Barrell, Ray & Pain, Nigel, 1997. "Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change, and Economic Growth within Europe," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(445), pages 1770-1786, November.
    10. Geoffrey Wyatt, 2005. "Government Consumption and Industrial Productivity: Scale and Compositional Effects," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 341-357, July.
    11. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    12. Sumit Dey-Chowdhury, 2008. "Methods explained: Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM)," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 2(9), pages 48-52, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Cheng & Shuang Yang & Yanli Wang, 2025. "Green Innovation or Expedient Compliance: Carbon Emission Reduction by Heavily Polluting Enterprises Under Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Jinda Wen & Haonan Chen, 2025. "Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Jingtai Wu & Xinyi Cai & Fei Zuo & Yue Dong, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Common Institutional Ownership on Corporate Green Transformation in the Context of “Dual Carbon”: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    2. Garita, Gus, 2009. "How Does Financial Openness Affect Economic Growth and its Components?," MPRA Paper 20099, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Barrell, Ray & Nahhas, Abdulkader, 2018. "Economic integration and bilateral FDI stocks: the impacts of NAFTA and the EU," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90372, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Suqin Ge & Dennis Tao Yang, 2014. "Changes In China'S Wage Structure," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 300-336, April.
    5. Bettina Becker & Nigel Driffield & Sandra Lancheros & James H. Love, 2021. "Correction to: FDI in hot labour markets: The implications of the war for talent," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(3), pages 453-454, September.
    6. Dellis, Konstantinos & Sondermann, David & Vansteenkiste, Isabel, 2017. "Determinants of FDI inflows in advanced economies: Does the quality of economic structures matter?," Working Paper Series 2066, European Central Bank.
    7. Mar𨀠 Ángeles Cadarso Vecina & Nuria Gómez Sanz & Luis Antonio López Santiago & Mar𨀠 Ángeles Tobarra Gómez, 2012. "Offshoring components and their effect on employment: firms deciding about how and where," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1009-1020, March.
    8. Nigel Driffield & James Love & Karl Taylor, 2008. "Productivity and Labour Demand Effects of Inward and Outward FDI on UK Industry," Working Papers 2008001, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2008.
    9. Ray Barrell & Abdulkader Nahhas, 2022. "Regional integration and bilateral FDI stocks in the OECD," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3032-3050, July.
    10. Lin, Jenny X. & Lincoln, William F., 2017. "Pirate's treasure," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 235-245.
    11. Ray Barrell & Sylvia Gottschalk & Dawn Holland & Ehsan Khoman & Iana Liadze & Olga Pomerantz, 2008. "The impact of EMU on growth and employment," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 318, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    12. Michael Peters & Ufuk Akcigit, 2014. "Lack of Selection and Poor Management Practices: Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries," 2014 Meeting Papers 762, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    13. Sai Ding & John Knight & Xiao Zhang, 2019. "Does China overinvest? Evidence from a panel of Chinese firms," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 489-507, April.
    14. Alberto Onetti & Hal Steger, 2007. "Formulating an open source business model requires community segmentation and targeted marketing," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0707, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    15. Mariam Camarero & Cecilio Tamarit, 2003. "Estimating exports and imports demand for Manufactured goods: The role of FDI," European Economy Group Working Papers 22, European Economy Group.
    16. Oriol Carreras & Iana Liadze & Simon Kirby & Rebecca Piggott, 2016. "Quantifying Fiscal Multipliers," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 469, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    17. Vincent Dortet-Bernadet & Michaël Sicsic, 2017. "The effect of R&D subsidies and tax incentives on employment: an evaluation for small firms in France," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 493, pages 5-22.
    18. Elliott, Robert J.R. & Zhou, Ying, 2015. "Co-location and Spatial Wage Spillovers in China: The Role of Foreign Ownership and Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 629-644.
    19. Simona Iammarino & Christos Pitelis, 2000. "Foreign Direct Investment and 'Less Favoured Regions': Greek FDI in Bulgaria and Romania," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 155-171, August.
    20. Georg Koopmann & Felix Münnich, 1999. "National and international developments in technology," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 34(6), pages 267-278, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:432-:d:1016422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.