IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11943-d1209746.html

Study on the Impact of Common Institutional Ownership on Corporate Green Transformation in the Context of “Dual Carbon”: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingtai Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Xinyi Cai

    (School of Economics and Management, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Fei Zuo

    (School of Economics and Management, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Yue Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China)

Abstract

Corporate green transformation is important for the realization of China’s “double carbon” goal and the construction of a green economy, but existing studies only explored the role of policy factors or internal corporate factors in influencing them, ignoring the driving factors of corporate green transformation in an industry. Based on the perspective of inter-industry enterprise linkage, combined with principal–agent theory and signaling theory, this study uses the data of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2021 and employs multiple linear regression to investigate the impact of common institutional ownership on corporate green transformation and its mechanism of action. The empirical findings show that common institutional ownership can significantly promote corporate green transformation, and the findings still hold after robustness tests. Principal–agent costs, total factor productivity, financing constraints, and business credit play a partial mediating role in this, and common institutional ownership has a better promotion effect on the enhancement of the degree of the green transformation of enterprises in non-heavily polluted industries. The results of this study not only can enrich the research on the economic consequences of joint institutional ownership but also have important guiding significance for China to promote the green transformation of enterprises and build a green economic system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingtai Wu & Xinyi Cai & Fei Zuo & Yue Dong, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Common Institutional Ownership on Corporate Green Transformation in the Context of “Dual Carbon”: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11943-:d:1209746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11943/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11943/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Jie (Jack) & Huang, Jiekun & Zhao, Shan, 2019. "Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 400-418.
    2. Wenjun Zhou & Xiaorong Huang & Hao Dai & Yuanmeng Xi & Zhansheng Wang & Long Chen, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Enterprises’ Green Innovation—Based on the Perspective of Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Paul M. Healy & Amy P. Hutton & Krishna G. Palepu, 1999. "Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 485-520, September.
    4. Zhou, Taiyun & Gan, Jiawu, 2022. "Institutional investors' site visits and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Xiumei Xu & Ruolan Jing & Feifei Lu, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure and Enterprise Green Innovation: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Li, Yueshan & Mao, Jinzhou & Chen, Shoudong & Yang, Dongliang, 2022. "Tax-reducing incentive and corporate green performance: What we learn from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 791-802.
    7. Jian Hao & Lin Chen & Na Zhang, 2022. "A Statistical Review of Considerations on the Implementation Path of China’s “Double Carbon” Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Jiang, Fuxiu & Cai, Wenjing & Wang, Xue & Zhu, Bing, 2018. "Multiple large shareholders and corporate investment: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 66-83.
    9. Jiaoping Yang & Shujun Wang & Shan Sun & Jianhua Zhu, 2022. "Influence Mechanism of High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration on Green Innovation Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Jacob Guinot & Zina Barghouti & Ricardo Chiva, 2022. "Understanding Green Innovation: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Zhijun Feng & Wei Chen, 2018. "Environmental Regulation, Green Innovation, and Industrial Green Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Li, Yukun & Zhu, Danfeng, 2022. "Share pledging and corporate environmental investment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    13. Xiaojun Sun & Jing Tang & Shilong Li, 2022. "Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Jie (Jack) He & Jiekun Huang, 2017. "Product Market Competition in a World of Cross-Ownership: Evidence from Institutional Blockholdings," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(8), pages 2674-2718.
    15. Cheng, Xin & (Helen) Wang, He & Wang, Xianjue, 2022. "Common institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Marcin Kacperczyk & Clemens Sialm & Lu Zheng, 2005. "On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 60(4), pages 1983-2011, August.
    17. Yang Shen & Xiuwu Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Dechao Han, 2022. "Structural Reform, Technological Progress and Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Shanshan Gao & Wenqi Li & Jiayi Meng & Jianfeng Shi & Jianhua Zhu, 2023. "A Study on the Impact Mechanism of Digitalization on Corporate Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Wang, Junqi & Cao, Hongjun, 2022. "Improving competitive strategic decisions of Chinese coal companies toward green transformation: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Xutang & Boubaker, Sabri & Liao, Jing & Yao, Shouyu, 2025. "The rise of common state ownership and corporate environmental performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    2. Wenjun Su & Xiaohui Zhao, 2025. "The impact of common institutional ownership on green innovation of China’s energy firms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Deng, Wenyueyang & Zhang, Zenglian & Guo, Borui, 2024. "Firm-level carbon risk awareness and Green transformation: A research on the motivation and consequences from government regulation and regional development perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Chao & Zhu, Tianqi & Xia, Xiaoxue & Zhao, Ziying & Zhao, Yiwen, 2024. "Common institutional ownership and corporate green investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1123-1149.
    2. Anting Li & Jianqiong Wang & Yaru Yang, 2026. "Dose common institutional ownership constrain tunneling?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1193-1228, April.
    3. Wenjun Su & Xiaohui Zhao, 2025. "The impact of common institutional ownership on green innovation of China’s energy firms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Wang, Shihao & Wang, Keyun & Guo, Mengting & Maqsood, Umer Sahil & Chen, Xuezhao, 2025. "Common institutional ownership and R&D manipulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Xu, Tianli & Xu, Longbing & Zhu, Siyuan, 2023. "Common ownership and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Chen, Shenglan & Ma, Hui & Wu, Qiang & Zhang, Hao, 2023. "Does common ownership constrain managerial rent extraction? Evidence from insider trading profitability," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Jie (Jack) He & Lantian Liang & Hui (Grace) Wang & Han Xia, 2024. "Networking Behind the Scenes: Institutional Cross-Industry Holdings and Corporate Loan Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4932-4952, July.
    8. Wang, Zhiwen, 2025. "The impact of common ownership between banks and firms on corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Hamza Nizar & Taher Hamza & Faten Lakhal, 2024. "How does institutional cross‐ownership affect firm productivity? The importance of the corporate social responsibility channel," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1988-2010, April.
    10. Ruichang Lu & Qiaowei Shen & Tenghui Wang & Xiaojun Zhang, 2022. "Frenemies: Corporate Advertising Under Common Ownership," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4645-4669, June.
    11. Xu, Zhibo & Padmanabhan, Prasad & Huang, Chia-Hsing, 2025. "Does institutional cross-ownership reduce corporate shadow banking activities? Evidence from Chinese firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Xu, Zhibo & Yan, Siyu & Gan, Zhongxin, 2025. "Common institutional ownership and abnormal stock trading halts," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Zhang, Linghao & Jin, Xinwei & Wu, Kai, 2025. "How do common institutional investors adapt to early technology adoption?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Zhou, Wei & Liu, Baohua & Chen, Tao & Chen, Yining, 2025. "Institutional investors' cross-ownership and internal control quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Khoo, Joye & Zheng, Chen & Pathan, Shams, 2024. "The beneficial effect of common ownership: Evidence from bank liquidity creation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. Dasgupta, Sudipto & Banerjee, Shantanu & SHI, RUI & Yan, Jiali, 2021. "Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers," CEPR Discussion Papers 15658, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Qian Ding & Jinyu Chen & Wu Chen, 2026. "Can Common Institutional Ownership Govern CSR Decoupling? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(2), pages 309-334, March.
    18. Li, Mangmang & Tang, Jinghua & Wu, Dingwen, 2025. "Beyond borders and industries: How cross-ownership drives ESG performance in China’ low-polluting firms after environmental regulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Ni, Xiaoran & Yin, David, 2023. "Is institutional common ownership commonly priced? Insights from the cost of equity capital," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Miaomiao Yi & Fei Ren & Zhang-Hangjian Chen, 2025. "Institutional Cross-Ownership and Corporate Sustainability Performance: Empirical Evidence Based on United Nations SDGs Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11943-:d:1209746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.