IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3659-d775699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Food for Feed Concept: Redefining the Use of Hotel Food Residues in Broiler Diets

Author

Listed:
  • Elisavet Giamouri

    (Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology & Feeding, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Athanasios C. Pappas

    (Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology & Feeding, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • George Papadomichelakis

    (Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology & Feeding, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Panagiotis E. Simitzis

    (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Thrassyvoulos Manios

    (Department of Agriculture, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Juergen Zentek

    (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

  • Katia Lasaridi

    (School of Environmental, Geography and Applied Economics, Harokopio University, 17671 Athens, Greece)

  • Eleni Tsiplakou

    (Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology & Feeding, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • George Zervas

    (Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology & Feeding, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

The large quantities of food waste that are generated every year have raised management concerns. Animal diets might be a feasible strategy for utilizing food waste and partially replacing commercially available feedstuffs. The present study examined the potential use of food waste originating from hotels for broiler chickens’ diets. Two hundred and forty (240) one-day-old broilers were allocated into four treatment groups, namely, control (C), non-meat treatment (NM), non-sterilized treatment (NS) and sterilized treatment (S), each with 5 replicate pens of 12 broilers. The experimental period lasted 42 days. Several parameters were recorded throughout the experiment, such as the initial and final body weight, the feed conversion ratio (FCR), the traits, some biochemical and hematological parameters, the weight of internal organs and selected breast meat quality indices. The results showed no major differences in health parameters and the carcass quality traits. There was also no difference in growth rate between the three groups (C, NS, S), but broilers fed the NM diet (without meat remnants) had a significantly lower growth rate by 11.4% compared to the control. Food waste residues can be an alternative feedstuff for broiler chickens and can maintain performance at acceptable levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisavet Giamouri & Athanasios C. Pappas & George Papadomichelakis & Panagiotis E. Simitzis & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Juergen Zentek & Katia Lasaridi & Eleni Tsiplakou & George Zervas, 2022. "The Food for Feed Concept: Redefining the Use of Hotel Food Residues in Broiler Diets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3659-:d:775699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornelis Gardebroek & Manuel A. Hernandez & Miguel Robles, 2016. "Market interdependence and volatility transmission among major crops," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(2), pages 141-155, March.
    2. Marta Castrica & Doriana E. A. Tedesco & Sara Panseri & Giovanni Ferrazzi & Vera Ventura & Dario G. Frisio & Claudia M. Balzaretti, 2018. "Pet Food as the Most Concrete Strategy for Using Food Waste as Feedstuff within the European Context: A Feasibility Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Doriana Eurosia Angela Tedesco & Sveva Scarioni & Aldo Tava & Sara Panseri & Antonio Zuorro, 2021. "Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Waste: Safety and Nutritional Characterisation for Their Potential Re-Use in Livestock Nutrition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Massimo Lucarini & Antonio Zuorro & Gabriella Di Lena & Roberto Lavecchia & Alessandra Durazzo & Barbara Benedetti & Ginevra Lombardi-Boccia, 2020. "Sustainable Management of Secondary Raw Materials from the Marine Food-Chain: A Case-Study Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstadinos Abeliotis & Christina Chroni & Katia Lasaridi & Evangelos Terzis & Fenia Galliou & Thrassyvoulos Manios, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment of a Solar Drying Unit for the Transformation of Food Waste into Animal Feed," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Foivos Zisis & Elisavet Giamouri & Christina Mitsiopoulou & Christos Christodoulou & Charalampos Kamilaris & Alexandros Mavrommatis & Athanasios C. Pappas & Eleni Tsiplakou, 2023. "An Overview of Poultry Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danilo Bertoni & Daniele Cavicchioli & Franco Donzelli & Giovanni Ferrazzi & Dario G. Frisio & Roberto Pretolani & Elena Claire Ricci & Vera Ventura, 2018. "Recent Contributions of Agricultural Economics Research in the Field of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Elisavet Giamouri & Foivos Zisis & Christina Mitsiopoulou & Christos Christodoulou & Athanasios C. Pappas & Panagiotis E. Simitzis & Charalampos Kamilaris & Fenia Galliou & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Alex, 2023. "Sustainable Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Small Ruminants Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Saghaian, Sayed & Nemati, Mehdi & Walters, Cory & Chen, Bo, 2018. "Asymmetric Price Volatility Transmission between U.S. Biofuel, Corn, and Oil Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(1), January.
    4. Bonato, Matteo, 2019. "Realized correlations, betas and volatility spillover in the agricultural commodity market: What has changed?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 184-202.
    5. Do, Quynh & Mishra, Nishikant & Colicchia, Claudia & Creazza, Alessandro & Ramudhin, Amar, 2022. "An extended institutional theory perspective on the adoption of circular economy practices: Insights from the seafood industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Ramos & Pablo Negri & Martín Breitkopf & María Laura Ojeda, 2021. "From International to Regional Commodity Price Pass-through Using Self-Driven Recurrent Networks," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4513, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    7. Han-Yu Zhu & Peng-Fei Dai & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2024. "Uncovering the Sino-US dynamic risk spillovers effects: Evidence from agricultural futures markets," Papers 2403.01745, arXiv.org.
    8. Kristína Hudecová & Miroslava Rajčániová, 2023. "The impact of geopolitical risk on agricultural commodity prices," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 129-139.
    9. Manuel A. Hernandez & Shahidur Rashid & Solomon Lemma & Tadesse Kuma, 2017. "Market Institutions and Price Relationships: The Case of Coffee in the Ethiopian Commodity Exchange," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 683-704.
    10. Ceballos, Francisco & Hernandez, Manuel A. & Minot, Nicholas & Robles, Miguel, 2017. "Grain Price and Volatility Transmission from International to Domestic Markets in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 305-320.
    11. Cui, Jinxin & Maghyereh, Aktham & Goh, Mark & Zou, Huiwen, 2022. "Risk spillovers and time-varying links between international oil and China’s commodity futures markets: Fresh evidence from the higher-order moments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    12. Hamadi, Hassan & Bassil, Charbel & Nehme, Tamara, 2017. "News surprises and volatility spillover among agricultural commodities: The case of corn, wheat, soybean and soybean oil," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 148-157.
    13. Sasichakorn Wongsaichia & Phaninee Naruetharadhol & Peerapong Wongthahan & Chavis Ketkaew, 2022. "Ideating A Sustainable Swine Feed Prototype: A Qualitative Approach in Farmers’ Pain Point Identification and Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Amar, Amine Ben & Goutte, Stéphane & Isleimeyyeh, Mohammad & Benkraiem, Ramzi, 2022. "Commodity markets dynamics: What do cross-commodities over different nearest-to-maturities tell us?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Dejan Živkov & Boris Kuzman & Jonel Subić, 2023. "Multi-frequency downside risk interconnectedness between soft agricultural commodities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 332-342.
    16. Doriana Eurosia Angela Tedesco & Sveva Scarioni & Aldo Tava & Sara Panseri & Antonio Zuorro, 2021. "Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Waste: Safety and Nutritional Characterisation for Their Potential Re-Use in Livestock Nutrition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    17. La Ode Nazaruddin & Balázs Gyenge & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "The Future Direction of Halal Food Additive and Ingredient Research in Economics and Business: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-40, March.
    18. Karel Diéguez-Santana & Liliana B. Sarduy-Pereira & Neyfe Sablón-Cossío & Horacio Bautista-Santos & Fabiola Sánchez-Galván & Sebastiana del Monserrate Ruíz Cedeño, 2022. "Evaluation of the Circular Economy in a Pitahaya Agri-Food Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Florin Aliu & Jiří Kučera & Simona Hašková, 2023. "Agricultural Commodities in the Context of the Russia-Ukraine War: Evidence from Corn, Wheat, Barley, and Sunflower Oil," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, March.
    20. de Nicola, Francesca & De Pace, Pierangelo & Hernandez, Manuel A., 2014. "Co-movement of major commodity price returns : time-series assessment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6845, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3659-:d:775699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.