IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2992-d763791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyi Zhao

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    Traffic Control Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, China)

  • Chunhai Gao

    (Traffic Control Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, China)

  • Tao Tang

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Contemporary industrial equipment is increasingly developing towards complexity. In order to ensure the high reliability and sustainability of industrial equipment, more flexible maintenance strategies have attracted extensive attention. In view of this, this paper aims to summarize the current situation of existing maintenance strategies, so as to enable colleagues in the industry to choose or formulate more efficient maintenance strategies. Firstly, the characteristics, application potential and limitations of single component maintenance strategies, such as corrective maintenance, preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance, are described in detail from the perspective of maintenance time. On the basis of single component maintenance and the dependency between multiple components, the advantages and disadvantages of multicomponent maintenance strategies, such as batch maintenance, opportunity maintenance and group maintenance, are summarized, and suggestions for the future maintenance of industrial equipment are proposed. Based on this, industries can select the appropriate maintenance strategy according to their equipment characteristics, or improve their existing maintenance strategies based on actual needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyi Zhao & Chunhai Gao & Tao Tang, 2022. "A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2992-:d:763791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang, Zhenglin & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2020. "Predictive group maintenance for multi-system multi-component networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    3. Bakhtiar Ostadi & Ramtin Hamedankhah, 2021. "A two-stage reliability optimization approach for solving series–parallel redundancy allocation problem considering the sale of worn-out parts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 381-396, September.
    4. Khac Tuan Huynh & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer & Inma T. Castro, 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Post-Print hal-00790728, HAL.
    5. Huynh, K.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C. & Castro, I.T., 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 497-508.
    6. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    7. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    8. Philip A. Scarf & Mohammed Deara, 2003. "Block replacement policies for a two‐component system with failure dependence," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(1), pages 70-87, February.
    9. Richard Cassady, C. & Paul Murdock, W. & Pohl, Edward A., 2001. "Selective maintenance for support equipment involving multiple maintenance actions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 252-258, March.
    10. Richard Barlow & Larry Hunter, 1960. "Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 90-100, February.
    11. Shayesteh, E. & Yu, J. & Hilber, P., 2018. "Maintenance optimization of power systems with renewable energy sources integrated," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 577-586.
    12. Wildeman, R. E. & Dekker, R. & Smit, A. C. J. M., 1997. "A dynamic policy for grouping maintenance activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 530-551, June.
    13. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    14. Tsai, Wen-Hsien & Yang, Chih-Hao & Chang, Jui-Chu & Lee, Hsiu-Li, 2014. "An Activity-Based Costing decision model for life cycle assessment in green building projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 607-619.
    15. Wakiru, James & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter N. & Chemweno, Peter K., 2021. "Integrated remanufacturing, maintenance and spares policies towards life extension of a multi-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet & Khan, Samir & Eiroa, Alexandre López & Butler, Nigel & Rushton, Keith & Brocklebank, Simon, 2017. "Perspectives on trading cost and availability for corrective maintenance at the equipment type level," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 53-69.
    17. Daming Lin & Ming J. Zuo & Richard C. M. Yam, 2001. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models with two categories of failure modes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 172-183, March.
    18. Xu, Ren-Hong & Lai, Yung-Cheng & Huang, Kwei-Long, 2021. "Decision support models for annual catenary maintenance task identification and assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Wang, Jinjiang & Liang, Yuanyuan & Zheng, Yinghao & Gao, Robert X. & Zhang, Fengli, 2020. "An integrated fault diagnosis and prognosis approach for predictive maintenance of wind turbine bearing with limited samples," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 642-650.
    20. DEDOPOULOS, Illias & SMEERS, Yves, 1998. "An age reduction appraoch for finite horizon optimization of preventive maintenance for single units subject to random failures," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1318, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    21. Hongming Zhou & Ya-Chih Tsai & Shenquan Huang & Yarong Chen & Fuh-Der Chou, 2021. "Single-Machine Scheduling with Fixed Periodic Preventive Maintenance to Minimise the Total Weighted Completion Times," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, April.
    22. Fan, Dongming & Zhang, Aibo & Feng, Qiang & Cai, Baoping & Liu, Yiliu & Ren, Yi, 2021. "Group maintenance optimization of subsea Xmas trees with stochastic dependency," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    23. Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai Canh & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-67.
    24. Francesco Polese & Carmen Gallucci & Luca Carrubbo & Rosalia Santulli, 2021. "Predictive Maintenance as a Driver for Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from a Public-Private Co-Financed R&D Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    25. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2014. "Maintenance grouping strategy for multi-component systems with dynamic contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 233-249.
    26. Noroozi, Alireza & Khakzad, Nima & Khan, Faisal & MacKinnon, Scott & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2013. "The role of human error in risk analysis: Application to pre- and post-maintenance procedures of process facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 251-258.
    27. Liao, Haitao & Elsayed, Elsayed A. & Chan, Ling-Yau, 2006. "Maintenance of continuously monitored degrading systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 821-835, December.
    28. Bakir, I. & Yildirim, M. & Ursavas, E., 2021. "An integrated optimization framework for multi-component predictive analytics in wind farm operations & maintenance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    29. Xia, Tangbin & Sun, Bowen & Chen, Zhen & Pan, Ershun & Wang, Hao & Xi, Lifeng, 2021. "Opportunistic maintenance policy integrating leasing profit and capacity balancing for serial-parallel leased systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    30. B C Giri & T Dohi, 2010. "Quantifying the risk in age and block replacement policies," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(7), pages 1151-1158, July.
    31. Ait-El-Cadi, Abdessamad & Gharbi, Ali & Dhouib, Karem & Artiba, Abdelhakim, 2021. "Integrated production, maintenance and quality control policy for unreliable manufacturing systems under dynamic inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    32. Fangqi Dong & Huaqiang Wang & Feng Men & Lijun Liang, 2021. "Customized Preventive Maintenance Strategies for Products Sold with Two-Dimensional Warranty," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, March.
    33. Ding, Fangfang & Tian, Zhigang, 2012. "Opportunistic maintenance for wind farms considering multi-level imperfect maintenance thresholds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 175-182.
    34. Yonit Barron, 2018. "Group maintenance policies for an R-out-of-N system with phase-type distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 79-105, February.
    35. Yingnan Yang & Hongming Xie, 2021. "Determination of Optimal MR&R Strategy and Inspection Intervals to Support Infrastructure Maintenance Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.
    36. Sun, Chengjun & Lin, Yiping & Han, Maoan, 2006. "Stability and Hopf bifurcation for an epidemic disease model with delay," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 204-216.
    37. Zhou, Xiaojun & Xi, Lifeng & Lee, Jay, 2007. "Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 530-534.
    38. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    39. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Jin, Hua & Liu, Shuang, 2021. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule incorporating delay time theory with imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    40. Lin, Boliang & Wu, Jianping & Lin, Ruixi & Wang, Jiaxi & Wang, Hui & Zhang, Xuhui, 2019. "Optimization of high-level preventive maintenance scheduling for high-speed trains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 261-275.
    41. Meissner, Robert & Rahn, Antonia & Wicke, Kai, 2021. "Developing prescriptive maintenance strategies in the aviation industry based on a discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostics decision making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    42. Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Pintelon, Liliane, 2013. "A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 39-50.
    43. Kenne, J.-P. & Gharbi, A. & Beit, M., 2007. "Age-dependent production planning and maintenance strategies in unreliable manufacturing systems with lost sale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 408-420, April.
    44. Wang, W. & Zhang, W., 2008. "An asset residual life prediction model based on expert judgments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 496-505, July.
    45. Bouvard, K. & Artus, S. & Bérenguer, C. & Cocquempot, V., 2011. "Condition-based dynamic maintenance operations planning & grouping. Application to commercial heavy vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 601-610.
    46. Zequeira, R.I. & Bérenguer, C., 2006. "Periodic imperfect preventive maintenance with two categories of competing failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 460-468.
    47. Tian, Zhigang & Liao, Haitao, 2011. "Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 581-589.
    48. Vimal Vijayan & Sanjay K Chaturvedi, 2021. "Multi-component maintenance grouping optimization based on stochastic dependency," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 293-305, April.
    49. D. N. P. Murthy & D. G. Nguyen, 1985. "Study of two‐component system with failure interaction," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 239-247, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Liang Yang & Qinming Liu & Tangbin Xia & Chunming Ye & Jiaxiang Li, 2022. "Preventive Maintenance Strategy Optimization in Manufacturing System Considering Energy Efficiency and Quality Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Jose E. Naranjo & Gustavo Caiza & Rommel Velastegui & Maritza Castro & Andrea Alarcon-Ortiz & Marcelo V. Garcia, 2022. "A Scoping Review of Pipeline Maintenance Methodologies Based on Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    3. Urbani, Michele & Brunelli, Matteo & Punkka, Antti, 2023. "An approach for bi-objective maintenance scheduling on a networked system with limited resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 101-113.
    4. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Ho, Tinkin & Ran, Xinchen & Mao, Baohua & Lan, Zhen, 2022. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule over variable horizons considering multi-stage degradation and dynamic strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein, 2015. "A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: Application to offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 373-384, October.
    6. Shi, Yue & Zhu, Weihang & Xiang, Yisha & Feng, Qianmei, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems subject to a system reliability requirement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    8. Wu, Tianyi & Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Zhang, Zihan & Zhao, Yu, 2020. "Dynamic maintenance strategy with iteratively updated group information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Manco, Pasquale & Rinaldi, Marta & Caterino, Mario & Fera, Marcello & Macchiaroli, Roberto, 2022. "Maintenance management for geographically distributed assets: a criticality-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    10. Do, Phuc & Assaf, Roy & Scarf, Phil & Iung, Benoit, 2019. "Modelling and application of condition-based maintenance for a two-component system with stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-97.
    11. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2014. "Maintenance grouping strategy for multi-component systems with dynamic contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 233-249.
    12. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    13. Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai Canh & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-67.
    14. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2017. "Joint predictive maintenance and inventory strategy for multi-component systems using Birnbaum’s structural importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 249-261.
    15. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2020. "Dynamic opportunistic maintenance planning for multi-component redundant systems with various types of opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Zhu, Wenjin & Fouladirad, Mitra & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2016. "A multi-level maintenance policy for a multi-component and multifailure mode system with two independent failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 50-63.
    17. Jiawen Hu & Zuhua Jiang & Haitao Liao, 2017. "Preventive maintenance of a batch production system under time-varying operational condition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5681-5705, October.
    18. Liang, Zhenglin & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2020. "Predictive group maintenance for multi-system multi-component networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2015. "Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 83-94.
    20. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2992-:d:763791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.