IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v214y2021ics0951832021003331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing prescriptive maintenance strategies in the aviation industry based on a discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostics decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Meissner, Robert
  • Rahn, Antonia
  • Wicke, Kai

Abstract

The aviation industry is facing an ever-increasing competition to lower its operating cost. Simultaneously, new factors, such as sustainability and customer experience, become more important to differentiate from competitors. As aircraft maintenance contributes about 20% to the overall cost of airline operations and can significantly influence other objectives of an airline as well, maintenance providers are required to constantly lower their cost share and contribute to a more reliable and sustainable aircraft operation. Subsequently, new condition-monitoring technologies have emerged that are expected to improve maintenance operations by reducing cost and increasing the aircraft’s availability. As many of these technologies are still in their technological infancy, it is necessary to determine the expected benefit for the airline operations with the given technological maturity and to develop suitable maintenance strategies that incorporate the newly gained insights. With this paper, a discrete-event simulation framework is developed that uses established parameters to describe a condition-monitoring technology’s performance and subsequently develops a suitable prescriptive maintenance strategy. Therefore, it enables the adjustment of the optimization goal for the developed strategy to incorporate performance features beyond the frequently used financial indicators. The developed capabilities will be demonstrated for the tire pressure measurement task of an Airbus A320.

Suggested Citation

  • Meissner, Robert & Rahn, Antonia & Wicke, Kai, 2021. "Developing prescriptive maintenance strategies in the aviation industry based on a discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostics decision making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:214:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021003331
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021003331
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2020. "An integrated assessment of safety and efficiency of aircraft maintenance strategies using agent-based modelling and stochastic Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Shi, Yue & Zhu, Weihang & Xiang, Yisha & Feng, Qianmei, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems subject to a system reliability requirement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    4. Gillen David, 2006. "Airline Business Models and Networks: Regulation, Competition and Evolution in Aviation Markets," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Windle, Robert & Dresner, Martin, 1999. "Competitive responses to low cost carrier entry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 59-75, March.
    6. Nakousi, C. & Pascual, R. & Anani, A. & Kristjanpoller, F. & Lillo, P., 2018. "An asset-management oriented methodology for mine haul-fleet usage scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 336-344.
    7. Godoy, David R. & Pascual, Rodrigo & Knights, Peter, 2014. "A decision-making framework to integrate maintenance contract conditions with critical spares management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 102-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghaleb, Mageed & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2022. "Assessing the impact of maintenance practices on asset's sustainability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Giannakeas, Ilias N. & Mazaheri, Fatemeh & Bacarreza, Omar & Khodaei, Zahra Sharif & Aliabadi, Ferri M.H., 2023. "Probabilistic residual strength assessment of smart composite aircraft panels using guided waves," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Leoni, Leonardo & De Carlo, Filippo & Tucci, Mario, 2023. "Developing a framework for generating production-dependent failure rate through discrete-event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. GAO, Guibing & ZHOU, Dengming & TANG, Hao & HU, Xin, 2021. "An Intelligent Health diagnosis and Maintenance Decision-making approach in Smart Manufacturing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Tseremoglou, Iordanis & Santos, Bruno F., 2024. "Condition-Based Maintenance scheduling of an aircraft fleet under partial observability: A Deep Reinforcement Learning approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    7. Tian, Yuan & Han, Minghao & Kulkarni, Chetan & Fink, Olga, 2022. "A prescriptive Dirichlet power allocation policy with deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. Zhang, Qin & Liu, Yu & Xiahou, Tangfan & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. "A heuristic maintenance scheduling framework for a military aircraft fleet under limited maintenance capacities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Jingyi Zhao & Chunhai Gao & Tao Tang, 2022. "A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Cha, Guesik & Park, Junseok & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2023. "Military aircraft flight and maintenance planning model considering heterogeneous maintenance tasks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    11. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Rui & Tian, Zhigang & Wang, Yifei & Zuo, Mingjian & Guo, Ziwei, 2023. "Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems considering prognostic information and degraded working efficiency," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Mitici, Mihaela & de Pater, Ingeborg & Barros, Anne & Zeng, Zhiguo, 2023. "Dynamic predictive maintenance for multiple components using data-driven probabilistic RUL prognostics: The case of turbofan engines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. de Pater, Ingeborg & Mitici, Mihaela, 2021. "Predictive maintenance for multi-component systems of repairables with Remaining-Useful-Life prognostics and a limited stock of spare components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    4. Kang, Renwei & Wang, Junfeng & Chen, Jianqiu & Zhou, Jingjing & Pang, Yanzhi & Guo, Longlong & Cheng, Jianfeng, 2022. "A method of online anomaly perception and failure prediction for high-speed automatic train protection system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Fageda, Xavier, 2014. "What hurts the dominant airlines at hub airports?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 177-189.
    6. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Zuidberg, Joost, 2019. "Network geographies and financial performances in low-cost carrier versus network carrier competition: The case of Norwegian versus SAS," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Nan Zhang & Sen Tian & Le Li & Zhongbin Wang & Jun Zhang, 2023. "Maintenance analysis of a partial observable K-out-of-N system with load sharing units," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 703-713, August.
    9. Bhadra, Dipasis & Kee, Jacqueline, 2008. "Structure and dynamics of the core US air travel markets: A basic empirical analysis of domestic passenger demand," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 27-39.
    10. Tsunoda, Yushi, 2018. "Transportation policy for high-speed rail competing with airlines," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 350-360.
    11. Joanna Hawlena & Grazyna Kowalska & Rafal Rowinski & Monika Madej, 2021. "Effectiveness of Shaping Multidirectional Functions of an Airport for the Development of the Region," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 873-884.
    12. Liu, Lu & Song, Xiao & Zhou, Zhetao, 2022. "Aircraft engine remaining useful life estimation via a double attention-based data-driven architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Murakami, Hideki & Asahi, Ryota, 2011. "Multimarket Contact And Market Power: A Case Of The U.S. Airline Industry," Hitotsubashi Journal of commerce and management, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 45(1), pages 81-88, October.
    14. Hideki Murakami & Ryota Asahi, 2011. "An empirical analysis of the effect of multimarket contacts on air carriers' pricing behaviors: A case of the U.S," Discussion Papers 2011-35, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    15. N. Knofius & M. C. Heijden & A. Sleptchenko & W. H. M. Zijm, 2021. "Improving effectiveness of spare parts supply by additive manufacturing as dual sourcing option," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 189-221, March.
    16. Zhang, Yahua & Sampaio, Breno & Fu, Xiaowen & Huang, Zhibin, 2018. "Pricing dynamics between airline groups with dual-brand services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 46-59.
    17. Chiuling Lu & Ann Yang & Jui-Feng Huang, 2015. "Bankruptcy predictions for U.S. air carrier operations: a study of financial data," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 39(3), pages 574-589, July.
    18. Bernardo, Valeria & Fageda, Xavier, 2020. "Impacts of competition on connecting travelers: Evidence from the transatlantic aviation market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 141-151.
    19. Wu, Shaomin & Do, Phuc, 2017. "Editorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-3.
    20. Zhou, Jianfeng & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "Petri-net based cooperation modeling and time analysis of emergency response in the context of domino effect prevention in process industries," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:214:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021003331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.