IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v168y2017icp53-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on trading cost and availability for corrective maintenance at the equipment type level

Author

Listed:
  • Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet
  • Khan, Samir
  • Eiroa, Alexandre López
  • Butler, Nigel
  • Rushton, Keith
  • Brocklebank, Simon

Abstract

Characterising maintenance costs has always been challenging due to a lack of accurate prior cost data and the uncertainties around equipment usage and reliability. Since preventive maintenance does not completely prevent corrective repairs in demanding environments, any unscheduled maintenance can have a large impact on the overall maintenance costs. This introduces the requirement to set up support contracts with minimum baseline solutions that warrant the target demand within certain costs and risks. This article investigates a process that has been developed to estimate performance based support contract costs attributed to corrective maintenance. These can play a dominant role in the through-life support of high values assets. The case context for the paper is the UK Ministry of Defence. The developed approach allows benchmarking support contract solutions, and enabling efficient planning decisions. Emphasis is placed on learning from feedback, testing and validating current methodologies for estimating corrective maintenance costs and availability at the Equipment Type level. These are interacting sub-equipment's that have unique availability requirements and hence have a much larger impact on the capital maintenance expenditure. The presented case studies demonstrate the applicability of the approach towards adequate savings and improved availability estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet & Khan, Samir & Eiroa, Alexandre López & Butler, Nigel & Rushton, Keith & Brocklebank, Simon, 2017. "Perspectives on trading cost and availability for corrective maintenance at the equipment type level," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 53-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:168:y:2017:i:c:p:53-69
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016308638
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmet Erkoyuncu, John & Khan, Samir & Hussain, Syed Mohammed Fazal & Roy, Rajkumar, 2016. "A framework to estimate the cost of No-Fault Found events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 207-222.
    2. K. Sadananda Upadhya & N. K. Srinivasan, 2005. "System simulation for availability of weapon systems under various missions," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 309-322.
    3. Khan, Samir & Phillips, Paul & Jennions, Ian & Hockley, Chris, 2014. "No Fault Found events in maintenance engineering Part 1: Current trends, implications and organizational practices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 183-195.
    4. de Jonge, Bram & Klingenberg, Warse & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2016. "Reducing costs by clustering maintenance activities for multiple critical units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 93-103.
    5. Faccio, M. & Persona, A. & Sgarbossa, F. & Zanin, G., 2014. "Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 85-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vrignat, Pascal & Kratz, Frédéric & Avila, Manuel, 2022. "Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    2. Stevan Djenadic & Dragan Ignjatovic & Milos Tanasijevic & Ugljesa Bugaric & Ivan Jankovic & Tomislav Subaranovic, 2019. "Development of the Availability Concept by Using Fuzzy Theory with AHP Correction, a Case Study: Bulldozers in the Open-Pit Lignite Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Li, Yao & He, Yihai & Liao, Ruoyu & Zheng, Xin & Dai, Wei, 2022. "Integrated predictive maintenance approach for multistate manufacturing system considering geometric and non-geometric defects of products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Wu, Shaomin & Do, Phuc, 2017. "Editorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-3.
    5. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Tao, Xin & Mårtensson, Jonas & Warnquist, Håkan & Pernestål, Anna, 2022. "Short-term maintenance planning of autonomous trucks for minimizing economic risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    7. Shi, Yan & Lu, Zhenzhou & Huang, Hongzhong & Liu, Yu & Li, Yanfeng & Zio, Enrico & Zhou, Yicheng, 2022. "A new preventive maintenance strategy optimization model considering lifecycle safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Jingyi Zhao & Chunhai Gao & Tao Tang, 2022. "A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Havinga, Maik J.A. & de Jonge, Bram, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance in the cyclic patrolling repairman problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Amir Homayoun Sarfaraz & Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Thomas Hanne & Peter Fernandes Wanke & Raheleh Sadat Hosseini, 2023. "Assessing repair and maintenance efficiency for water suppliers: a novel hybrid USBM-FIS framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1321-1342, September.
    4. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    5. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    6. da Costa, Paulo & Verleijsdonk, Peter & Voorberg, Simon & Akcay, Alp & Kapodistria, Stella & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Zhang, Yingqian, 2023. "Policies for the dynamic traveling maintainer problem with alerts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1141-1152.
    7. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    8. Uit Het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and load-sharing optimization for two-unit systems with economic dependency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1119-1131.
    9. Chin, Hon Huin & Wang, Bohong & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Zeng, Min & Wang, Qiu-Wang, 2020. "Long-term investment and maintenance planning for heat exchanger network retrofit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    10. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    11. Alireza Tabrizikahou & Piotr Nowotarski, 2021. "Mitigating the Energy Consumption and the Carbon Emission in the Building Structures by Optimization of the Construction Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    13. Yoon, Joung Taek & Youn, Byeng D. & Yoo, Minji & Kim, Yunhan & Kim, Sooho, 2019. "Life-cycle maintenance cost analysis framework considering time-dependent false and missed alarms for fault diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 181-192.
    14. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.
    15. Han, Changwoon & Park, Seungil & Lee, Hyeonseok, 2019. "Intermittent failure in electrical interconnection of avionics system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 61-71.
    16. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    17. Monnin, Maxime & Iung, Benoit & Sénéchal, Olivier, 2011. "Dynamic behavioural model for assessing impact of regeneration actions on system availability: Application to weapon systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 410-424.
    18. Ahmet Erkoyuncu, John & Khan, Samir & Hussain, Syed Mohammed Fazal & Roy, Rajkumar, 2016. "A framework to estimate the cost of No-Fault Found events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 207-222.
    19. Prakash Chandra & Yogesh Mani Tripathi & Liang Wang & Chandrakant Lodhi, 2023. "Estimation for Kies distribution with generalized progressive hybrid censoring under partially observed competing risks model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1048-1072, December.
    20. B. Kirubakaran & M. Ilangkumaran, 2016. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 285-313, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:168:y:2017:i:c:p:53-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.