IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9935-d885732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of ‘Compulsory’ Shifting to Use e-Services during COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions Period on e-Services Users’ Future Attitude and Intention “Case Study of Central European Countries/Visegrád Group (V4)”

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Alassaf

    (Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly u. 1., H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

  • Zsigmond Gábor Szalay

    (Department of Agridigitalization and Extension Activities, Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly u. 1., H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

Abstract

This study takes advantage of COVID-19 experience in regards of ‘compulsory’ shifting toward using e-services to evaluate Central European countries’ citizens’ future attitude and intention to keep using e-services after COVID-19 pandemic precautionary measures end regarding the case study of Visegrád Group (V4) countries: Czech, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, considering the impact of users’ satisfaction with e-services during that period, taking age and gender as control variables. Total of 354 survey responses used in analyzing distributed questionnaire answers. The study found 84% of V4 countries’ users between 18–35 years old were satisfied and willing to keep using e-services, whereas only 44.5% of 46–55-year-old users have this future willingness, the vast majority of oldest respondents between 56–65 don’t intend to keep using e-services after COVID-19 pandemic precautionary measures end, while only 16.6% having the intention to do so. Moreover, this research finds no impact of gender on e-services satisfaction, attitude and intention in regard to the study. One of the main contributions of this study is raising attention to the decreasing intentions to keep using e-services among users above 35 as their age increases, addressing this weakness is very important to involve older generations in future digitizing-projects and successful e-government implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Alassaf & Zsigmond Gábor Szalay, 2022. "The Impact of ‘Compulsory’ Shifting to Use e-Services during COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions Period on e-Services Users’ Future Attitude and Intention “Case Study of Central European Countries/Visegrád," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9935-:d:885732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9935/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9935/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Blut, Markus & Chowdhry, Nivriti & Mittal, Vikas & Brock, Christian, 2015. "E-Service Quality: A Meta-Analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 679-700.
    3. Ronggang Zhou & Xiaorui Wang & Yuhan Shi & Renqian Zhang & Leyuan Zhang & Haiyan Guo, 2019. "Measuring e-service quality and its importance to customer satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study in a telecom setting," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 477-499, September.
    4. San-Martín, Sonia & Prodanova, Jana & Jiménez, Nadia, 2015. "The impact of age in the generation of satisfaction and WOM in mobile shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Jain, Nikunj Kumar & Gajjar, Hasmukh & Shah, Bhavin J., 2021. "Electronic logistics service quality and repurchase intention in e-tailing: Catalytic role of shopping satisfaction, payment options, gender and returning experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Maja Rožman & Simona Sternad Zabukovšek & Samo Bobek & Polona Tominc, 2021. "Gender Differences in Work Satisfaction, Work Engagement and Work Efficiency of Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case in Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Mano, Haim & Oliver, Richard L, 1993. "Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 451-466, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Al-Debei, Mutaz M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Ikrame Selkani, 2018. "Festival Attractiveness Literature Review," International Journal of World Policy and Development Studies, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(9), pages 89-97, 11-2018.
    3. Singh, Jaywant & Shukla, Paurav & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B., 2022. "Desire, need, and obligation: Examining commitment to luxury brands in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    4. Organ, Kate & Koenig-Lewis, Nicole & Palmer, Adrian & Probert, Jane, 2015. "Festivals as agents for behaviour change: A study of food festival engagement and subsequent food choices," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 84-99.
    5. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Yanyan Chen & Susannah M. Davis, 2019. "Deeds Not Words: A Cosmopolitan Perspective on the Influences of Corporate Sustainability and NGO Engagement on the Adoption of Sustainable Products in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 135-154, August.
    6. Hsin-Hui Lee & Chia-Hsing Liang & Shu-Yi Liao & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Analyzing the Intention of Consumer Purchasing Behaviors in Relation to Internet Memes Using VAB Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Selim, Hassan & Eid, Riyad & Agag, Gomaa & Shehawy, Yasser Moustafa, 2022. "Cross-national differences in travelers’ continuance of knowledge sharing in online travel communities," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Pookulangara, Sanjukta & Hawley, Jana & Xiao, Ge, 2011. "Explaining consumers’ channel-switching behavior using the theory of planned behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 311-321.
    9. Silvia Platania & Kyle Maurice Woosnam & Manuel Alector Ribeiro, 2021. "Factors Predicting Individuals’ Behavioural Intentions for Choosing Cultural Tourism: A Structural Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Mehdi Khademi Gerashi & Farbod Fakhreddin, 2021. "Influence of emotions on purchase loyalty among child consumers: the moderating role of family communication patterns," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(4), pages 298-310, December.
    11. Md. Kamrul Hasan & Ahmed Rageh Ismail & MD. Faridul Islam, 2017. "Tourist risk perceptions and revisit intention: A critical review of literature," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1412874-141, January.
    12. Dennis Owusu Amofah & Junwu Chai, 2022. "Sustaining Consumer E-Commerce Adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do Trust and Payment Method Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    15. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    16. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    17. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    19. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    20. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9935-:d:885732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.