IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7618-d845168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intermediary Organizations in Nature Conservation Initiatives: The Case of the EU-Funded LIFE Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Rigo

    (Department of Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali (TESAF), Università degli Studi di Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

  • Elena Andriollo

    (Department of Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali (TESAF), Università degli Studi di Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

  • Elena Pisani

    (Department of Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali (TESAF), Università degli Studi di Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

This study was aimed to identify intermediary organizations active in nature conservation initiatives by adopting a multi-level (ML) and network governance (NG) framework and using social network analysis (SNA). We identified 256 coordinating beneficiaries and 1090 associated beneficiaries connected through 8310 project relations and financed through the EU-funded LIFE Programme from 2014 to 2020. Our results evidence a central component of the network where organizations from Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom play a central role. In contrast, peripheral components return a framework of partnerships mainly constituted by actors of the same country (68%). Moreover, the characterization by type of actor confirms the widespread implementation of a multi-level governance approach in LIFE-Nature (NAT) projects, evidencing the significant presence of non-governmental organizations and foundations, mainly at a national level, in nature conservation initiatives. Our findings reveal that the intermediary capacity of key actors should be further reinforced, particularly toward the promotion of transnational cooperation and cross-sector alliances, by encouraging the involvement of stakeholders operating at the ground level (i.e., provincial and municipal levels).

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Rigo & Elena Andriollo & Elena Pisani, 2022. "Intermediary Organizations in Nature Conservation Initiatives: The Case of the EU-Funded LIFE Programme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7618-:d:845168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Jonker & André Nijhof, 2006. "Looking Through the Eyes of Others: assessing mutual expectations and experiences in order to shape dialogue and collaboration between business and NGOs with respect to CSR," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 456-466, September.
    2. Pretty, Jules & Ward, Hugh, 2001. "Social Capital and the Environment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 209-227, February.
    3. Sergio Currarini & Matthew O. Jackson & Paolo Pin, 2009. "An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and Segregation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1003-1045, July.
    4. Matt Andrews, 2014. "An Ends-Means Approach to Looking at Governance," CID Working Papers 281, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    5. Julia Porter Liebeskind & Amalya Lumerman Oliver & Lynne Zucker & Marilynn Brewer, 1996. "Social networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 428-443, August.
    6. Borg, Riikka & Toikka, Arho & Primmer, Eeva, 2015. "Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 90-97.
    7. Eric Abrahamson & Lori Rosenkopf, 1997. "Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 289-309, June.
    8. Linyuan Lü & Tao Zhou & Qian-Ming Zhang & H. Eugene Stanley, 2016. "The H-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, April.
    9. Janssen, Marco A. & Ostrom, Elinor, 2006. "Governing Social-Ecological Systems," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 30, pages 1465-1509, Elsevier.
    10. Gibson, Clark C. & Ostrom, Elinor & Ahn, T. K., 2000. "The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 217-239, February.
    11. Weber, Norbert & Christophersen, Tim, 2002. "The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, May.
    12. Coren L. Apicella & Frank W. Marlowe & James H. Fowler & Nicholas A. Christakis, 2012. "Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers," Nature, Nature, vol. 481(7382), pages 497-501, January.
    13. Zisenis, Marcus, 2017. "Is the Natura 2000 network of the European Union the key land use policy tool for preserving Europe’s biodiversity heritage?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 408-416.
    14. Kozová, Mária & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Pauditšová, Eva & Tomčíková, Ivana & Rakytová, Iveta, 2018. "Network and participatory governance in urban forestry: An assessment of examples from selected Slovakian cities," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 31-41.
    15. Muneta Yokomatsu & Hitomu Kotani, 2021. "Knowledge sharing, heterophily, and social network dynamics," The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 111-133, April.
    16. Jiren, Tolera Senbeto & Bergsten, Arvid & Dorresteijn, Ine & Collier, Neil French & Leventon, Julia & Fischer, Joern, 2018. "Integrating food security and biodiversity governance: A multi-level social network analysis in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 420-429.
    17. Duncan Russel & Sergio Castellari & Alessio Capriolo & Suraje Dessai & Mikael Hildén & Anne Jensen & Eleni Karali & Kirsi Mäkinen & Helle Ørsted Nielsen & Sabine Weiland & Roos den Uyl & Jenny Tröltzs, 2020. "Policy Coordination for National Climate Change Adaptation in Europe: All Process, but Little Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Seidl, Andrew & Mulungu, Kelvin & Arlaud, Marco & van den Heuvel, Onno & Riva, Massimiliano, 2020. "Finance for nature: A global estimate of public biodiversity investments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Tyler Scott, 2015. "Does Collaboration Make Any Difference? Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 537-566, June.
    20. Ingold, Karin & Fischer, Manuel & Christopoulos, Dimitris, 2021. "The roles actors play in policy networks: Central positions in strongly institutionalized fields," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 213-235, June.
    21. Schulz, Tobias & Lieberherr, Eva & Zabel, Astrid, 2018. "Network governance in national Swiss forest policy: Balancing effectiveness and legitimacy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 42-53.
    22. Andrews, Matt, 2014. "An Ends-Means Approach to Looking at Governance," Working Paper Series rwp14-022, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    23. Sabrina Lai, 2020. "Hindrances to Effective Implementation of the Habitats Directive in Italy: Regional Differences in Designating Special Areas of Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    24. Seejeen Park & Seunghoo Lim, 2018. "Are Networks Flat or Vertical?: Developing a Multi-Level Multi-Dimension Network Model," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 223-243, June.
    25. Francesca Ferranti & Esther Turnhout & Raoul Beunen & Jelle Hendrik Behagel, 2014. "Shifting nature conservation approaches in Natura 2000 and the implications for the roles of stakeholders," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 1642-1657, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    2. Põllumäe, Priit & Lilleleht, Ando & Korjus, Henn, 2016. "Institutional barriers in forest owners' cooperation: The case of Estonia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 9-16.
    3. Creutzburg, Leonard & Lieberherr, Eva, 2021. "To log or not to log? Actor preferences and networks in Swiss forest policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Lovrić, Marko & Lovrić, Nataša & Schraml, Ulrich, 2019. "Modeling policy networks: The case of Natura 2000 in Croatian forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 90-102.
    5. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," Papers 1912.06346, arXiv.org.
    6. Felix Rauschmayer & Sybille van den Hove & Thomas Koetz, 2009. "Participation in EU Biodiversity Governance: How Far beyond Rhetoric?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(1), pages 42-58, February.
    7. Papazoglou, Michalis E. & Spanos, Yiannis E., 2018. "Bridging distant technological domains: A longitudinal study of the determinants of breadth of innovation diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1713-1728.
    8. Matt Andrews & Stuart Russell & Douglas Barrios, 2016. "Governance and the Challenge of Development Through Sports: A Framework for Action," CID Working Papers 323, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    9. Fuad, Syed & Farmer, Michael C., 2023. "The Strength of Weak Ties as a Strategy to Allocate Research Funds: Making a Bioenergy Research Network More Productive," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335781, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Topf, Julie & Schultz, Leonardo A. & Silva, José Maria Cardoso da, 2023. "An index to measure the sustainability of place-based development pathways," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    11. Philip Antwi-Agyei & Andrew Dougill & Evan Fraser & Lindsay Stringer, 2013. "Characterising the nature of household vulnerability to climate variability: empirical evidence from two regions of Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 903-926, August.
    12. Michener, Gregory, 2015. "Policy Evaluation via Composite Indexes: Qualitative Lessons from International Transparency Policy Indexes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 184-196.
    13. Pablo Brañas-Garza & Lorenzo Ductor & Jaromir Kovarik, 2022. "The role of unobservable characteristics in friendship network formation," ThE Papers 22/08, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    14. Brescancin, Flavia & Dobšinská, Zuzana & De Meo, Isabella & Šálka, Jaroslav & Paletto, Alessandro, 2018. "Analysis of stakeholders' involvement in the implementation of the Natura 2000 network in Slovakia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 22-30.
    15. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," CeMMAP working papers CWP71/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. Geitzenauer, Maria & Blondet, Marieke & de Koning, Jessica & Ferranti, Francesca & Sotirov, Metodi & Weiss, Gerhard & Winkel, Georg, 2017. "The challenge of financing the implementation of Natura 2000 – Empirical evidence from six European Union Member States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 3-13.
    17. Soh, Pek Hooi, 1966- & Roberts, Edward Baer. & International Center for Research on the Management of Technology., 1998. "The patterns of interorganizational networks in the development of data communication technologies," Working papers 173-98, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Soh, Pek-Hooi & Roberts, Edward B., 2003. "Networks of innovators: a longitudinal perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1569-1588, October.
    19. Bayer, Péter, 2023. "Evolutionarily stable networks," TSE Working Papers 23-1487, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    20. Murtazashvili, Ilia & Murtazashvili, Jennifer & Salahodjaev, Raufhon, 2019. "Trust and deforestation: A cross-country comparison," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 111-119.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7618-:d:845168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.