IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2765-d510281.html

A Cultural Heritage Low Entropy Enhancement Approach: An Ex Post Evaluation of Creative Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Cerreta

    (Department of Architecture (DiARC), University of Naples Federico II, 80134 Naples, Italy
    National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute of Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Gaia Daldanise

    (National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute of Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Eleonora Giovene di Girasole

    (National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute of Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Carmelo Maria Torre

    (Department of Civil Engineering Sciences and Architecture, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

According to the current European and Italian scenario related to urban regeneration, cultural and landscape heritage valorization is being enhanced by the activation of innovative processes and new emerging approaches. These involve the development of methodologies and tools that can address decision-making processes based on creative practices consistent with a concept named “low-entropy economy” in this paper. The low-entropy economy represents an economic approach based on the minimization of physical urban transformation and the enhancement of the existing heritage. In this perspective, the research aims to develop the Cultural Heritage Low Entropy Enhancement (CHLEE) approach by exploring how some frugal experiences have promoted cultural heritage enhancement and related complex values through a program of temporary uses and activities able to produce new values, where the human experience is essential. A crucial role is represented by the heterogeneity of creative practices that contribute to identifying and implementing innovative management and governance models. The analysis of creative practices, based upon the ex post evaluation of some Italian case studies across the PROMETHEE-GAIA multicriteria method, is able to show how these experiences build innovation ecosystems and improve the ex ante evaluation for new strategies and policies, underlining strengths, weaknesses, and milestones that shape creative experiences as drivers of urban competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Eleonora Giovene di Girasole & Carmelo Maria Torre, 2021. "A Cultural Heritage Low Entropy Enhancement Approach: An Ex Post Evaluation of Creative Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2765-:d:510281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2765/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2765/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Santagata, 2002. "Cultural districts, property rights, and sustainable economic growth," Others 0210004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Olsson, Nils O.E. & Krane, Hans Petter & Rolstadås, Asbjørn & Veiseth, Mads, 2010. "Influence of reference points in ex post evaluations of rail infrastructure projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 251-258, August.
    3. Ashworth, Gregory & Page, Stephen J., 2011. "Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Walter Santagata, 2002. "Cultural Districts, Property Rights and Sustainable Economic Growth," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 9-23, March.
    5. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessia Marello, 2020. "An Application of the A’WOT Analysis for the Management of Cultural Heritage Assets: The Case of the Historical Farmhouses in the Aglié Castle (Turin)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    6. ., 1998. "Experimiental Economics," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. W. Hands & Uskali Mäki (ed.), The Handbook of Economic Methodology, chapter 36, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Gaia Daldanise, 2020. "From Place-Branding to Community-Branding: A Collaborative Decision-Making Process for Cultural Heritage Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Wendy Proctor & Martin Drechsler, 2006. "Deliberative Multicriteria Evaluation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(2), pages 169-190, April.
    9. Vozna Liudmyla Yu., 2016. "The Notion of Entropy in an Economic Analysis: the Classical Examples and New Perspectives," Journal of Heterodox Economics, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Maria Cerreta & Eleonora Giovene di Girasole, 2020. "Towards Heritage Community Assessment: Indicators Proposal for the Self-Evaluation in Faro Convention Network Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Maria Cerreta & Giuliano Poli, 2017. "Landscape Services Assessment: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Guido Ferilli & Pier Luigi Sacco & Giorgio Tavano Blessi & Stefano Forbici, 2017. "Power to the people: when culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 241-258, February.
    13. Raffaele Attardi & Alessandro Bonifazi & Carmelo M. Torre, 2012. "Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans, 1990. "The PROMETHEE methods for MCDM: the PROMCALC, GAIA and BANK ADVISER software," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9337, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    16. Bottero, Marta & Oppio, Alessandra & Bonardo, Martina & Quaglia, Giulia, 2019. "Hybrid evaluation approaches for urban regeneration processes of landfills and industrial sites: the case of the Kwun Tong area in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 585-594.
    17. Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata, 2012. "Cultural Commons: A New Perspective on the Production and Evolution of Cultures," Chapters, in: Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata (ed.), Cultural Commons, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Bosone & Maria Casola & Gaia Daldanise & Domenico Vito, 2023. "Stimulating Circular Urban Regeneration through Cultural and Sustainable Communities: The Proposal for a Green Blue Youth Vision 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Gaia Daldanise & Massimo Clemente, 2022. "Port Cities Creative Heritage Enhancement (PCCHE) Scenario Approach: Culture and Creativity for Sustainable Development of Naples Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Cerreta & Alessia Elefante & Ludovica La Rocca, 2020. "A Creative Living Lab for the Adaptive Reuse of the Morticelli Church: The SSMOLL Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Gaia Daldanise & Massimo Clemente, 2022. "Port Cities Creative Heritage Enhancement (PCCHE) Scenario Approach: Culture and Creativity for Sustainable Development of Naples Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Van Puyenbroeck, Tom & Montalto, Valentina & Saisana, Michaela, 2021. "Benchmarking culture in Europe: A data envelopment analysis approach to identify city-specific strengths," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 584-597.
    5. Lei Xiong & Cheng-Lein Teng & Bo-Wei Zhu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2017. "Using the D-DANP-mV Model to Explore the Continuous System Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Creative Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-37, October.
    6. Marco Guerzoni & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2014. "Music consumption at the dawn of the music industry: the rise of a cultural fad," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(2), pages 145-171, May.
    7. Maria Cerreta & Eleonora Giovene di Girasole, 2020. "Towards Heritage Community Assessment: Indicators Proposal for the Self-Evaluation in Faro Convention Network Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Aldo Buzio & Alessio Re, 2012. "Cultural Commons and New Concepts in UNESCO World Heritage Sites Recognition and Management," Chapters, in: Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata (ed.), Cultural Commons, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Arnaboldi, Michela & Spiller, Nicola, 2011. "Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of Cultural Districts," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 641-654.
    10. Bingtao Xu & Zongye Gu & Ziwen Wang & Yaqiao Chen & Yanling Wang, 2026. "The coupling coordination relationship and obstacle factors of public cultural services and economic development: A case study of 31 regions in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Etxano, Iker & Villalba-Eguiluz, Unai, 2021. "Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Christian Barrère, 2016. "Cultural heritages: From official to informal [Patrimoines culturels : des patrimoines officiels aux patrimoines informels]," Post-Print hal-02569029, HAL.
    13. Hung, Chi-Sen, 2022. "A study of local government strategies to promote youth entrepreneurial clusters in cultural and creative industries," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 2(1), pages 54-67.
    14. Martina Bosone & Maria Casola & Gaia Daldanise & Domenico Vito, 2023. "Stimulating Circular Urban Regeneration through Cultural and Sustainable Communities: The Proposal for a Green Blue Youth Vision 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    15. Claudia Faraone, 2022. "Territorial Challenges for Cultural and Creative Industries’ Contribution to Sustainable Innovation: Evidence from the Interreg Ita-Slo Project DIVA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-34, September.
    16. Chen, Tai-Yueh & Chang, Wei-Chen & Hsieh, Kuo-Jung & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Advancing Taiwan's traditional craft products: A modular product design model of manufacturing technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Ghafele Roya & Santagata Walter, 2006. "Cultural Tourism and Collective Trademarks: The Case of Byblos and Saida, Lebanon," EBLA Working Papers 200601, University of Turin.
    18. Christian Barrère & Sophie Delabruyère, 2011. "Intellectual property rights on creativity and heritage: the case of the fashion industry," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 305-339, December.
    19. Portillo, Javier E. & Wagner, Gary A., 2021. "Do cultural districts spur urban revitalization: Evidence from Louisiana," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 651-673.
    20. Kubińska, Elżbieta & Adamczyk-Kowalczuk, Magdalena & Andrzejewski, Mariusz & Rozakis, Stelios, 2022. "Incorporating the status quo effect into the decision making process: The case of municipal companies merger," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2765-:d:510281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.