IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p9862-d450933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Heritage Community Assessment: Indicators Proposal for the Self-Evaluation in Faro Convention Network Process

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Cerreta

    (Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, 80134 Naples, Italy
    Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Eleonora Giovene di Girasole

    (Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 80134 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The Faro Convention introduces an innovative concept of cultural heritage by recognising the importance of the community that is formed around the cultural asset to be enhanced. This concept is consistent with the New European Agenda for Culture, especially the European Year Cultural Heritage (EYCH) Initiative 9 “Heritage for all: citizen participation and social innovation”, that promotes a broader understanding of heritage, placing people and communities at the centre and involving them in making decisions about heritage valorisation. The cultural heritage acquires the meaning of common good and has been configured as “cultural commons”, expression of values shared by the heritage community and of the process activated to enhance it. In this perspective, the paper presents a proposal for the integration of the evaluation process identified by the Faro Convention, explaining the appropriate indicators useful for analysing the specificity of the valorisation processes and making them comparable. The methodological proposal was tested for the experience of the Friends of Molo San Vincenzo Heritage Community, activated in Naples, Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Cerreta & Eleonora Giovene di Girasole, 2020. "Towards Heritage Community Assessment: Indicators Proposal for the Self-Evaluation in Faro Convention Network Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9862-:d:450933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Cerreta & Simona Panaro, 2017. "From Perceived Values to Shared Values: A Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Analysis (M-SSDA) for Resilient Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Maria Cerreta & Giuliano Poli, 2017. "Landscape Services Assessment: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Support System (MC-SDSS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata, 2012. "Cultural Commons: A New Perspective on the Production and Evolution of Cultures," Chapters, in: Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata (ed.), Cultural Commons, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Izabella Parowicz, 2019. "Cultural Heritage Marketing," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-00287-9, March.
    5. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonia Gravagnuolo & Serena Micheletti & Martina Bosone, 2021. "A Participatory Approach for “Circular” Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage. Building a Heritage Community in Salerno, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-33, April.
    2. Maria Cerreta & Alessia Elefante & Ludovica La Rocca, 2020. "A Creative Living Lab for the Adaptive Reuse of the Morticelli Church: The SSMOLL Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Alessandro Piperno & Christian Iaione & Luna Kappler, 2023. "Institutional Collective Actions for Culture and Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Martina Bosone & Pasquale De Toro & Luigi Fusco Girard & Antonia Gravagnuolo & Silvia Iodice, 2021. "Indicators for Ex-Post Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Impacts in the Perspective of the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Eleonora Giovene di Girasole & Carmelo Maria Torre, 2021. "A Cultural Heritage Low Entropy Enhancement Approach: An Ex Post Evaluation of Creative Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Eleonora Giovene di Girasole & Carmelo Maria Torre, 2021. "A Cultural Heritage Low Entropy Enhancement Approach: An Ex Post Evaluation of Creative Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Gaia Daldanise, 2020. "From Place-Branding to Community-Branding: A Collaborative Decision-Making Process for Cultural Heritage Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Chuhan Chen & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2023. "The Influence of Multistakeholder Value Cognition and Risk Attitudes on Sustainable Interior Landscape Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Gerd Lupp & Aude Zingraff-Hamed & Josh J. Huang & Amy Oen & Stephan Pauleit, 2020. "Living Labs—A Concept for Co-Designing Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Buscema, Massimo & Ferilli, Guido & Gustafsson, Christer & Massini, Giulia & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2022. "A nonlinear, data-driven, ANNs-based approach to culture-led development policies in rural areas: The case of Gjakove and Peć districts, Western Kosovo," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. Franziska Görmar, 2023. "Loss and change: Culture narratives in old industrial regions in East Germany," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(7), pages 1577-1595, September.
    9. Madison, Michael J & Frischmann, Brett M. & Strandburg, Katherine J., 2017. "Governing Knowledge Commons -- Introduction & Chapter 1," LawRxiv af3ud, Center for Open Science.
    10. Maria Cerreta & Simona Panaro & Giuliano Poli, 2021. "A Spatial Decision Support System for Multifunctional Landscape Assessment: A Transformative Resilience Perspective for Vulnerable Inland Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Marcos Valdivia & Ricardo Macip, 2018. "Production of New Creative Knowledge in a Local Developing Economy: The Case of Puerto Vallarta," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(2), pages 309-326, April.
    12. Libera Amenta & Arjan Van Timmeren, 2018. "Beyond Wastescapes: Towards Circular Landscapes. Addressing the Spatial Dimension of Circularity through the Regeneration of Wastescapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Jung-Ying Chang, 2019. "State participation and artistic autonomy in creative city making," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 226-243, February.
    14. Madison, Michael J & Frischmann, Brett M. & Strandburg, Katherine J, 2019. "Knowledge Commons," LawRxiv avxf5, Center for Open Science.
    15. Hao Liu & Lin Ma, 2020. "Spatial Pattern and Effects of Urban Coordinated Development in China’s Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Pasquale De Toro & Enrico Formato & Nicola Fierro, 2023. "Sustainability Assessments of Peri-Urban Areas: An Evaluation Model for the Territorialization of the Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, July.
    17. Martina Bosone & Maria Casola & Gaia Daldanise & Domenico Vito, 2023. "Stimulating Circular Urban Regeneration through Cultural and Sustainable Communities: The Proposal for a Green Blue Youth Vision 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    18. Christian Barrère & Cyril Hédoin, 2014. "From Cultural Capital to Cultural Heritages [Du capital culturel aux patrimoines culturels]," Post-Print hal-02569033, HAL.
    19. Madison, Michael J & Frischmann, Brett M. & Strandburg, Katherine J., 2017. "Knowledge Commons," LawRxiv ftqyw, Center for Open Science.
    20. Corina TURȘIE & Thomas PERRIN, 2020. "Assessing the social and cultural impacts of the European Capital of Culture programme in cross-border regions. A research agenda," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 77-98, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9862-:d:450933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.