IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6293-d567514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compliance of Goat Farming under Extensive Grazing with the Organic Standards and Its Contribution to Sustainability in Puebla, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • José Nahed Toral

    (Grupo Agroecología, Departamento de Agricultura, Sociedad y Ambiente, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur., Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur S/N, Barrio Ma. Auxiliadora, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas 29290, Mexico)

  • Zenón Gerardo López Tecpoyotl

    (Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Puebla, Boulevard Forjadores de Puebla Núm. 205, Santiago Momoxpan, Municipio de San Pedro Cholula, 72760 Puebla, Mexico)

  • José Roberto Aguilar Jiménez

    (Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Rancho San Francisco Km. 8 Carretera Ejido Emiliano Zapata, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, 29060 Chiapas, Mexico)

  • Daniel Grande Cano

    (Área de Sistemas de Producción Agropecuarios, División de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Vicentina, Alcaldía de Iztapalapa, 09340 Ciudad de México, Mexico)

  • Claudia Delgadillo Puga

    (Departamento de Nutrición Animal Dr. Fernando Pérez-Gil Romo, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ), Vasco de Quiroga 15, 14080 Ciudad de México, Mexico)

Abstract

In order to determine whether organic production may be a viable option for goat farmers of the lower Mixteca region of Puebla, Mexico, in order to increase sustainability of their farms, we evaluated the extent to which these goat farms fulfill organic standards. Additionally, we revised their level of sustainability by calculating an Organic Livestock Conversion Index (OLCI) using 10 indicators and 36 variables. Information was obtained through two means: direct observation and a questionnaire applied to 119 goat farmers of six municipalities of the region. These goat farms principally consist of creole goats that graze in extensive communal rangelands and grasslands in non-arable lands with xerophytic vegetation, and their principal product is meat of adult goats. The goat farms had a moderate level of OLCI (48.0–53.6%) as well as a moderate level of sustainability (46.0–58%) for the goat farms included in this study). Five indicators showed limited compliance of the goat farms, with organic standards. Five showed a high level of compliance. The greater the OLCI value, the greater the sustainability of the goat farms. Increasing the level of compliance of the goat farms of the lower Mixteca region of Puebla, with the organic standards, which would in turn increase their level of sustainability, would require improving technical, social, environmental, and economic aspects of these farms, as well as co-responsibility in promoting sustainable organic goat farming by the different social actors involved (farmers, researchers, technical advisors, and policymakers).

Suggested Citation

  • José Nahed Toral & Zenón Gerardo López Tecpoyotl & José Roberto Aguilar Jiménez & Daniel Grande Cano & Claudia Delgadillo Puga, 2021. "Compliance of Goat Farming under Extensive Grazing with the Organic Standards and Its Contribution to Sustainability in Puebla, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6293-:d:567514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina Paraskevopoulou & Alexandros Theodoridis & Marion Johnson & Athanasios Ragkos & Lisa Arguile & Laurence Smith & Dimitrios Vlachos & Georgios Arsenos, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Goat and Sheep Farms: A Comparison between European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Tinjung Mary Prihtanti & Suhatmini Hardyastuti & Slamet Hartono & Irham, 2014. "Social-cultural Functions of Rice Farming Systems," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(5), pages 341-351.
    3. Kaufmann, Robert K. & Cleveland, Cutler J., 1995. "Measuring sustainability: needed--an interdisciplinary approach to an interdisciplinary concept," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 109-112, November.
    4. Tinjung Mary Prihtanti & Suhatmini Hardyastuti & Slamet Hartono & Irham, 2014. "Social-cultural Functions of Rice Farming Systems," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(5), pages 341-351, May.
    5. Alfredo J. Escribano, 2016. "Beef Cattle Farms’ Conversion to the Organic System. Recommendations for Success in the Face of Future Changes in a Global Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Prihtanti, Tinjung Mary & Hardyastuti, Suhatmini & Hartono, Slamet & Irham, 2014. "Social-cultural Functions of Rice Farming Systems," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 4(05), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Belcher, K. W. & Boehm, M. M. & Fulton, M. E., 2004. "Agroecosystem sustainability: a system simulation model approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 225-241, February.
    8. José Roberto Aguilar-Jiménez & José Nahed-Toral & Manuel Roberto Parra-Vázquez & Francisco Guevara-Hernández & Lucio Alberto Pat-Fernández, 2019. "Adaptability of Cattle-Raising to Multiple Stressors in the Dry Tropics of Chiapas, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masoud Yazdanpanah & Maryam Tajeri Moghadam & Farhad Javan & Mojtaba Deghanpour & Stefan Sieber & Peyman Falsafi, 2022. "How rationality, morality, and fear shape willingness to carry out organic crop cultivation: a case study of farmers in southwestern Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2145-2163, February.
    2. Consuelo García de la Torre & Luis Portales & Gustavo A. Yepes López, 2021. "Sostenibilidad en las pymes de América Latina y el Caribe," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1306, October.
    3. Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Helena Hansson & Ulf Sonesson & Stefan Gunnarsson, 2021. "A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature on Sustainability at Farm-Level in Beef and Lamb Meat Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Hongxing Liu & Wendong Zhang & Elena Irwin & Jeffrey Kast & Noel Aloysius & Jay Martin & Margaret Kalcic, 2020. "Best Management Practices and Nutrient Reduction: An Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Model of the Western Lake Erie Basin," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(4), pages 510-530.
    5. Stefano Bartolini & Luigi Bonatti, 2004. "Does Technical Progress Increase Long-Run Welfare?," Department of Economics University of Siena 435, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    6. Mateja Janeš & Minja Zorc & Maja Ferenčaković & Ino Curik & Peter Dovč & Vlatka Cubric-Curik, 2021. "Genomic Characterization of the Three Balkan Livestock Guardian Dogs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Aris Sudomo & Budi Leksono & Hesti Lestari Tata & Anita Apriliani Dwi Rahayu & Aziz Umroni & Heny Rianawati & Asmaliyah & Krisnawati & Ali Setyayudi & Marcellinus Mandira Budi Utomo & Levina Augusta G, 2023. "Can Agroforestry Contribute to Food and Livelihood Security for Indonesia’s Smallholders in the Climate Change Era?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Liu, Xinyu & Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Comparing national environmental and economic performances through emergy sustainability indicators: Moving environmental ethics beyond anthropocentrism toward ecocentrism," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1532-1542.
    9. Van Passel, Steven & Nevens, Frank & Mathijs, Erik & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2007. "Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 149-161, April.
    10. Asimeh, Mahboubeh & Nooripoor, Mehdi & Azadi, Hossein & Van Eetvelde, Veerle & Sklenička, Petr & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Agricultural land use sustainability in Southwest Iran: Improving land leveling using consolidation plans," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Richard, Bastien & Bonté, Bruno & Delmas, Magalie & Braud, Isabelle & Cheviron, Bruno & Veyssier, Julien & Barreteau, Olivier, 2022. "A co-simulation approach to study the impact of gravity collective irrigation constraints on plant dynamics in Southern France," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. Roberto Louis Forestal & Shih-Ming Pi, 2021. "Using Artificial Neural networks and Optimal Scaling Model to Forecast Agriculture Commodity Price: An Ecological-economic Approach," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 1-3.
    13. Smith, Laurence G. & Westaway, Sally & Mullender, Samantha & Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur & Xu, Ying & Lehmann, Lisa Mølgaard & Pisanelli, Andrea & Russo, Giuseppe & Borek, Robert & Wawer, Rafał & Borzęcka, M, 2022. "Assessing the multidimensional elements of sustainability in European agroforestry systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Maria Tsiouni & Stamatis Aggelopoulos & Alexandra Pavloudi & Dario Siggia, 2021. "Economic and Financial Sustainability Dependency on Subsidies: The Case of Goat Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Danilo Gambelli & Francesco Solfanelli & Stefano Orsini & Raffaele Zanoli, 2021. "Measuring the Economic Performance of Small Ruminant Farms Using Balanced Scorecard and Importance-Performance Analysis: A European Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Feola, Giuseppe & Binder, Claudia R., 2010. "Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2323-2333, October.
    17. Alice Issanchou, 2016. "Soil resource, at the core of competitiveness and sustainability issues in agriculture: an economic approach," Working Papers SMART 16-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    18. Modin-Edman, Anna-Karin & Oborn, Ingrid & Sverdrup, Harald, 2007. "FARMFLOW--A dynamic model for phosphorus mass flow, simulating conventional and organic management of a Swedish dairy farm," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 431-444, May.
    19. Bertrand Méda & Léonie Dusart & Juliette Protino & Philippe Lescoat & Cécile Berri & Pascale Magdelaine & Isabelle Bouvarel, 2021. "OVALI, Sustainability for Poultry ® : A Method Co-Designed by Stakeholders to Assess the Sustainability of Chicken Supply Chains in Their Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Pamela Berry & Fuad Yassin & Kenneth Belcher & Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, 2017. "An Economic Assessment of Local Farm Multi-Purpose Surface Water Retention Systems under Future Climate Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6293-:d:567514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.