IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v506y2025ics0304380025001279.html

A system dynamics modeling framework to evaluate impacts on economic, environmental, and social quality components of a U.S. Midwestern agroecosystem transitioning from row crop agriculture to mixed farming systems

Author

Listed:
  • Papanicolaou, Athanasios (Thanos) N.
  • Basnet, Keshav
  • O’Brien, Peter L.
  • Wacha, Kenneth M.
  • Malone, Robert W.
  • Archer, David W.

Abstract

Agroecosystems comprise environmental, economic, and social components with complex interactions that affect systemwide performance. Attempts to describe or predict how agroecosystems respond to management must account for these interconnected components, so approaches that are limited to a single discipline cannot capture the complexities necessary for a holistic understanding of performance. The goal of this research is to develop a system dynamics (SD) modeling framework that can provide quantitative measures of consequences of management on each component of an agroecosystem. A SD framework is proposed with a description of model components, as well as an illustration of methodological steps to evaluate model performance through calibration, validation, and sensitivity testing. The model structure is based on a complex web of (i) stocks that describe the system’s state, (ii) flows that represent the direction and rate of change, and (iii) auxiliary parameters that assign quantitative values to each component. The capacity of the model to adequately evaluate agroecosystem response is demonstrated using a case study investigating environmental, economic, and social indicators while manipulating multiple management practices, including cover crops, tillage, and integration of crop and livestock operations. Importantly, the SD model identified tradeoffs in the three indicators that accurately reflect producer experiences when making management decisions. For example, the integration of cash crops, cover crops, and livestock clearly improves economic and environmental endpoints while negatively impacting social quality with reduction in leisure time. These findings suggest the SD modeling framework provides a viable approach for the quantitative evaluation of management interventions that can be adapted to a range of complex agroecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Papanicolaou, Athanasios (Thanos) N. & Basnet, Keshav & O’Brien, Peter L. & Wacha, Kenneth M. & Malone, Robert W. & Archer, David W., 2025. "A system dynamics modeling framework to evaluate impacts on economic, environmental, and social quality components of a U.S. Midwestern agroecosystem transitioning from row crop agriculture to mixed f," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 506(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:506:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001279
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001279
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioanna Mouratiadou & Alexander Wezel & Kintan Kamilia & Angelica Marchetti & Maria Luisa Paracchini & Paolo Bàrberi, 2024. "The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review," Post-Print hal-04527200, HAL.
    2. Steph Herbstritt & Tom L. Richard & Sergio H. Lence & Huaiqing Wu & Peter L. O’Brien & Bryan D. Emmett & Tom C. Kaspar & Douglas L. Karlen & Keith Kohler & Robert W. Malone, 2022. "Rye as an Energy Cover Crop: Management, Forage Quality, and Revenue Opportunities for Feed and Bioenergy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Mohamed Elhakeem & Athanasios Papanicolaou, 2009. "Estimation of the Runoff Curve Number via Direct Rainfall Simulator Measurements in the State of Iowa, USA," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(12), pages 2455-2473, September.
    4. Benjamin L. Turner & Hector M. Menendez & Roger Gates & Luis O. Tedeschi & Alberto S. Atzori, 2016. "System Dynamics Modeling for Agricultural and Natural Resource Management Issues: Review of Some Past Cases and Forecasting Future Roles," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Aziz Bouzaher & Richard Cabe & Stanley R. Johnson & Andrew Manale & Jason F. Shogren, 1994. "CEEPES: An Evolving System for Agro-environmental Policy," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 94-wp122, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Parsons, David & Nicholson, Charles F. & Blake, Robert W. & Ketterings, Quirine M. & Ramírez-Aviles, Luis & Fox, Danny G. & Tedeschi, Luis O. & Cherney, Jerome H., 2011. "Development and evaluation of an integrated simulation model for assessing smallholder crop-livestock production in Yucatán, Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Walters, Jeffrey P. & Archer, David W. & Sassenrath, Gretchen F. & Hendrickson, John R. & Hanson, Jon D. & Halloran, John M. & Vadas, Peter & Alarcon, Vladimir J., 2016. "Exploring agricultural production systems and their fundamental components with system dynamics modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 333(C), pages 51-65.
    8. Belcher, K. W. & Boehm, M. M. & Fulton, M. E., 2004. "Agroecosystem sustainability: a system simulation model approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 225-241, February.
    9. Peter Spirtes & Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines, 2001. "Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262194406, December.
    10. Yuan Tian & Kristen Hassmiller Lich & Nathaniel D. Osgood & Kirsten Eom & David B. Matchar, 2016. "Linked Sensitivity Analysis, Calibration, and Uncertainty Analysis Using a System Dynamics Model for Stroke Comparative Effectiveness Research," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(8), pages 1043-1057, November.
    11. Zhai, Yijie & Bai, Yueyang & Wu, Zhen & Hong, Jinglan & Shen, Xiaoxu & Xie, Fei & Li, Xiangzhi, 2022. "Grain self-sufficiency versus environmental stress: An integration of system dynamics and life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Deng Ding & David Bennett & Silvia Secchi, 2015. "Investigating Impacts of Alternative Crop Market Scenarios on Land Use Change with an Agent-Based Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vatn, Arild & Bakken, Lars & Bleken, Marina A. & Baadshaug, Ole Hans & Fykse, Haldor & Haugen, Lars E. & Lundekvam, Helge & Morken, John & Romstad, Eirik & Rorstad, Per Kristian & Skjelvag, Arne O. & , 2006. "A methodology for integrated economic and environmental analysis of pollution from agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 270-293, June.
    2. Kelechukwu G. Odoemena & Jeffrey P. Walters & Holger Maximilian Kleemann, 2020. "A System Dynamics Model of Supply-Side Issues Influencing Beef Consumption in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Shari, Babajide Epe & Dioha, Michael O. & Abraham-Dukuma, Magnus C. & Sobanke, Victor O. & Emodi, Nnaemeka V., 2022. "Clean cooking energy transition in Nigeria: Policy implications for Developing countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 319-343.
    4. Bareinboim Elias & Pearl Judea, 2013. "A General Algorithm for Deciding Transportability of Experimental Results," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 107-134, June.
    5. Vili, Dragomir, 2021. "Economie agrara si dezvoltare rurala - realitati si perspective pentru Romania," MPRA Paper 117512, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2021.
    6. Ana Paula Coelho Clauberg & Renato de Mello & Flávio José Simioni & Simone Sehnem, 2021. "System for assessing the sustainability conditions of small hydro plants by fuzzy logic," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 300-317, March.
    7. Bettendorf, Timo & Heinlein, Reinhold, 2019. "Connectedness between G10 currencies: Searching for the causal structure," Discussion Papers 06/2019, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    8. Ali, Muhammad Fadzli & Akber, Md. Ali & Smith, Carl & Aziz, Ammar Abdul, 2021. "The dynamics of rubber production in Malaysia: Potential impacts, challenges and proposed interventions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Steliana Rodino & Ruxandra Pop & Cristina Sterie & Andreea Giuca & Eduard Dumitru, 2023. "Developing an Evaluation Framework for Circular Agriculture: A Pathway to Sustainable Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, October.
    10. James D. A. Millington & Hang Xiong & Steve Peterson & Jeremy Woods, 2017. "Integrating Modelling Approaches for Understanding Telecoupling: Global Food Trade and Local Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Matinzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Abedi Koupai, Jahangir & Sadeghi-Lari, Adnan & Nozari, Hamed & Shayannejad, Mohammad, 2017. "Development of an innovative integrated model for the simulation of nitrogen dynamics in farmlands with drainage systems using the system dynamics approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 11-28.
    12. Maarten J. Bijlsma & Rhian M. Daniel & Fanny Janssen & Bianca L. De Stavola, 2017. "An Assessment and Extension of the Mechanism-Based Approach to the Identification of Age-Period-Cohort Models," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(2), pages 721-743, April.
    13. Tonnang, Henri E.Z. & Hervé, Bisseleua D.B. & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Salifu, Daisy & Subramanian, Sevgan & Ngowi, Valentine B. & Guimapi, Ritter Y.A. & Anani, Bruce & Kakmeni, Francois M.M. & Aff, 2017. "Advances in crop insect modelling methods—Towards a whole system approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 88-103.
    14. Hongxing Liu & Wendong Zhang & Elena Irwin & Jeffrey Kast & Noel Aloysius & Jay Martin & Margaret Kalcic, 2020. "Best Management Practices and Nutrient Reduction: An Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Model of the Western Lake Erie Basin," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(4), pages 510-530.
    15. Anh, Hoang Ha & Phuong, Dang Nguyen Dong & Hanh, Tran Minh Da & Ha, Phan Thi & Loi, Nguyen Kim, 2025. "Assessing the feasibility of achieving agricultural development targets in alignment with the development blueprint of Kon Tum Province, Vietnam," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Cooper, Gregory S. & Rich, Karl M. & Shankar, Bhavani & Rana, Vinay & Ratna, Nazmun N. & Kadiyala, Suneetha & Alam, Mohammad J. & Nadagouda, Sharan B., 2021. "Identifying ‘win-win-win’ futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Aris Sudomo & Budi Leksono & Hesti Lestari Tata & Anita Apriliani Dwi Rahayu & Aziz Umroni & Heny Rianawati & Asmaliyah & Krisnawati & Ali Setyayudi & Marcellinus Mandira Budi Utomo & Levina Augusta G, 2023. "Can Agroforestry Contribute to Food and Livelihood Security for Indonesia’s Smallholders in the Climate Change Era?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, September.
    18. Espinoza Pérez, Lorena & Espinoza Pérez, Andrea & Vásquez, Óscar C., 2024. "Evaluation of mitigation initiatives for simultaneous air pollution and municipal solid waste systems: A System Dynamics Approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Chen, Pu & Hsiao, Chih-Ying, 2008. "What happens to Japan if China catches a cold?: A causal analysis of Chinese growth and Japanese growth," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 622-638, December.
    20. Zhai, Yijie & Bai, Yueyang & Shen, Xiaoxu & Zhang, Tianzuo & Jia, Yuke & Ren, Ke & Zhou, Xinying & Cheng, Ziyue & Hong, Jinglan, 2023. "Provincial water availability footprint evaluation and transfer analysis of China’s grain products: A life cycle perspective," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:506:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.