IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1822-d326364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Business Incubators as a Tool for Entrepreneurship Development: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Business Start-Up and Government Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Cai Li

    (School of Management, Department of Management Science & Engineering, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Jingkou District, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212000, China)

  • Naveed Ahmed

    (School of Management, Department of Management Science & Engineering, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Jingkou District, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212000, China)

  • Sikandar Ali Qalati

    (School of Management, Department of Marketing, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Jingkou District, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212000, China)

  • Asadullah Khan

    (Department of Business Management, Karakoram International University Gilgit, District Gilgit 15100, Pakistan)

  • Shumaila Naz

    (Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, The Superior College 20 km riwand Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

Abstract

Business incubators create value by combining the entrepreneurial spirit of start-ups with the resources that are typically available to new businesses. It is widely recognized that knowledge-based entrepreneurial companies are the main creators of economic growth, and such enterprises require special business development services. Therefore, the study aims to examine the role of business incubators in providing greater services (networking services, capital support, and training programs) in entrepreneurship development. Secondly, it also examines the mediating and moderating role of business start-up and government regulations for entrepreneurship. Using a quantitative methodology, we examine 567 samples through structural equation modeling. We find that the business incubators are playing an effective mediating role in providing networking services, capital support, and training programs to individuals and entrepreneurs, which are significant for entrepreneurship development, whereas business start-up positively mediates the relationship between networking services, capital support, training programs, and entrepreneurship development. Government regulations for entrepreneurship have a direct effect on entrepreneurship development. More importantly, government regulations for entrepreneurship have a positive moderating effect between business start-up and entrepreneurship development. Our study identifies the critical resources needed to improve the quality of business incubators and to ensure the availability of such resources to improve entrepreneurship development.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai Li & Naveed Ahmed & Sikandar Ali Qalati & Asadullah Khan & Shumaila Naz, 2020. "Role of Business Incubators as a Tool for Entrepreneurship Development: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Business Start-Up and Government Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1822-:d:326364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1822/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1822/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Stel & David Storey & A. Thurik, 2007. "The Effect of Business Regulations on Nascent and Young Business Entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 171-186, March.
    2. Pryor, Frederic L., 2002. "Quantitative notes on the extent of governmental regulations in various OECD nations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 693-714, May.
    3. Nowiński, Witold & Haddoud, Mohamed Yacine, 2019. "The role of inspiring role models in enhancing entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 183-193.
    4. Kwapisz, Agnieszka, 2019. "Do government and legal barriers impede entrepreneurship in the U.S.? An exploratory study of perceived vs. actual barriers," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    6. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Axel Mittelstädt & Fabienne Cerri, 2008. "Fostering Entrepreneurship for Innovation," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2008/5, OECD Publishing.
    8. David Smallbone & Friederike Welter, 2010. "Entrepreneurship and Government Policy in Former Soviet Republics: Belarus and Estonia Compared," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(2), pages 195-210, April.
    9. Andreas Pfeil, 2001. "Venture capital: New ways of financing technology innovation," Human Development Occasional Papers (1992-2007) HDOCPA-2001-09, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
    10. Radosław Wolniak & Michalene Eva Grebski & Bożena Skotnicka-Zasadzień, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of the Level of Satisfaction with the Services Received at the Business Incubators (Hazleton, PA, USA and Gliwice, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Diana M. Hechavarría & Amy E. Ingram, 2019. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions and gendered national-level entrepreneurial activity: a 14-year panel study of GEM," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 431-458, August.
    12. Stefano Bonini & Vincenzo Capizzi, 2019. "The role of venture capital in the emerging entrepreneurial finance ecosystem: future threats and opportunities," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2-3), pages 137-175, July.
    13. Steven C. Michael & John A. Pearce, 2009. "The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 285-302, May.
    14. Ahmed Musa Khan & Mohd Yasir Arafat & Mohd Anas Raushan & Imran Saleem & Nawab Ali Khan & Mohd Mohsin Khan, 2019. "Does intellectual capital affect the venture creation decision in India?," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    16. Yoon, Hyungseok (David) & Kim, Namil & Buisson, Bernard & Phillips, Fred, 2018. "A cross-national study of knowledge, government intervention, and innovative nascent entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 243-252.
    17. María Redondo & Carmen Camarero, 2019. "Social Capital in University Business Incubators: dimensions, antecedents and outcomes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 599-624, June.
    18. Zahra, Shaker A. & Covin, Jeffrey G., 1995. "Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 43-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reem Al Sharif & Shaligram Pokharel & Mohamed Arselene Ayari & Marwa Essam & Salwa Aqeel, 2022. "Enabling Open Innovation in Digital Startups through the Incubation Program—A Case of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Shehu Rabiah Na-Allah & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Venture Creation in Nigerian Context: Assessing Mediating and Moderating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Support among Graduates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Marco Fidel Flórez & Jhon Fredys Linares & Eduardo Carrillo & Francisco Milton Mendes & Bruno de Sousa, 2022. "Proposal for a Framework to Develop Sustainable Tourism on the Santurbán Moor, Colombia, as an Alternative Source of Income between Environmental Sustainability and Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Qalati, Sikander Ali & Yuan, Li Wen & Khan, Muhammad Aamir Shafique & Anwar, Farooq, 2021. "A mediated model on the adoption of social media and SMEs’ performance in developing countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Phallapa Petison & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2022. "A Quest for a Sustainable Social Enterprise Model: The Case of Amphawa Chaipattananurak, the Kingdom of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, December.
    6. Sonia Chetouane & Hania Chetouane, 2023. "Digital Business Incubators and Digital Entrepreneurship: The case of Digital Incubation Center in Qatar," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 33-50, July.
    7. Rabiah Na-Allah Shehu & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2023. "Entrepreneurship education and graduate’s venture creation activities: roles of entrepreneurial support and entrepreneurial capabilities," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Sofia Gomes & João Ferreira & João Morais Lopes & Luís Farinha, 2022. "The Impacts of the Entrepreneurial Conditions on Economic Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Wang Jiatong & Cai Li & Majid Murad & Fakhar Shahzad & Sheikh Farhan Ashraf, 2021. "Impact of Social Entrepreneurial Factors on Sustainable Enterprise Development: Mediating Role of Social Network and Moderating Effect of Government Regulations," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    10. Hu, Yubei & Ahmad, Ali J. & Lu, Dawei, 2023. "Performance management challenges at Chinese business incubators: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Wenyuan Li & Naveed Ahmed & Manzoor Ali Mirani & Asadullah Khan, 2020. "Examining the Factors Affecting SME Performance: The Mediating Role of Social Media Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John A. Pearce II & David A. Fritz & Peter S. Davis, 2010. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 219-248, January.
    2. Tendai Douglas Svotwa & Olumide Jaiyeoba & Mornay Roberts-Lombard & Charles Makanyeza, 2022. "Perceived Access to Finance, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy, Attitude Toward Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Ability, and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Botswana Youth Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    3. Ismael Barros-Contreras & Héctor Pérez-Fernández & Natalia Martín-Cruz & Juan Hernangómez B., 2023. "Can we make family social capital flourish? The moderating role of generational involvement," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 655-673, September.
    4. Manuel M. Molina-López & Manuel R. Tejeiro Koller & Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Susana González-Pérez, 2021. "Never Too Late to Learn: How Education Helps Female Entrepreneurs at Overcoming Barriers in the Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. José Alberto Martínez-González & Carmen Dolores Álvarez-Albelo & Javier Mendoza-Jiménez & Urszula Kobylinska, 2022. "Predicting the Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Starting Up a New Company: A Regional Study Using PLS-SEM and Data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Yeo, Vincent Cheow Sern & Goh, See-Kwong & Rezaei, Sajad, 2017. "Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 150-162.
    7. Sanchez-Famoso, Valeriano & Pittino, Daniel & Chirico, Francesco & Maseda, Amaia & Iturralde, Txomin, 2019. "Social capital and innovation in family firms: The moderating roles of family control and generational involvement," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    8. Kuo, Ying-Feng & Chen, Fei-Lung, 2023. "The effect of interactivity of brands’ marketing activities on Facebook fan pages on continuous participation intentions: An S–O-R framework study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    11. Ferreira, Joao J. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Veiga, Pedro Mota & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "The interactions of entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations in the (twin) environmental and digital transitions? A dynamic panel data approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Michael Sheppard, 2020. "The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 195-219, March.
    13. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Yulin Fang & Detmar W. Straub, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-331, June.
    14. Lingling Gao & Kerem Aksel Waechter, 0. "Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    15. Jinjing Yang & Cong Cao & Chensang Ye & Yangyan Shi, 2022. "Effects of Interface Design and Live Atmosphere on Consumers’ Impulse-Buying Behaviour from the Perspective of Human–Computer Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Ascensión Barroso & Óscar R. González-López & Ramón Sanguino & María Buenadicha-Mateos, 2018. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Largest 500 Family Firms’ Websites through PLS-SEM Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    18. Jean, Ruey-Jer “Bryan” & Kim, Daekwan & Cavusgil, Erin, 2020. "Antecedents and outcomes of digital platform risk for international new ventures’ internationalization," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    19. Rizaldi Yusfiarto & Septy Setia Nugraha & Galuh Tri Pambekti & Annes Nisrina Khoirunnisa, 2023. "Building loyalty in Islamic banking relationship: a multiple mediation approach empirically in Indonesia," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 306-320, June.
    20. Leischnig, Alexander & Geigenmueller, Anja & Lohmann, Stefanie, 2014. "On the role of alliance management capability, organizational compatibility, and interaction quality in interorganizational technology transfer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1049-1057.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1822-:d:326364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.