IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p2183-d222024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Indicator System and Evaluation Model for Regional Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yifei Shi

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Xinghang Ge

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
    School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Xueliang Yuan

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Qingsong Wang

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Jon Kellett

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia)

  • Fangqiu Li

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Kaiming Ba

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

Abstract

Regional sustainable development has become a worldwide issue in recent years, but there is no single and universally agreed method of choosing indicators for sustainable development assessment. The subjective selection of indicators will affect the results of assessment. Each evaluation method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the methods used to determine indicator weight also differ. Regional sustainable development is a complex system, which is difficult to evaluate objectively and scientifically using a single method. Therefore, a new integrated indicator system and evaluation model is constructed here to more accurately reflect regional sustainable development level. The indicator system and evaluation model were constructed using a case study of 17 cities in Shandong Province, China. The indicator system includes 4 subsystems, i.e., economy, society, resource, and environment. These indicators were selected through correlation analysis and discrimination analysis. A back propagation neural network was applied to evaluate the respective scores of the 4 subsystems. The comprehensive score for regional sustainable development was evaluated using the analytic hierarchy process with entropy correction. The results show that sustainable development levels in these 17 cities show a gradually decreasing trend from east to west and from coast to inland. Cities with an underdeveloped economy usually display poor levels of social development and serious environmental pollution. Through the improvement of indicator screening, evaluation model, and result correction, the error caused by a single evaluation method can be reduced significantly. This new methodology for indicator selection and comprehensive evaluation provides a new perspective for the assessment of regional sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifei Shi & Xinghang Ge & Xueliang Yuan & Qingsong Wang & Jon Kellett & Fangqiu Li & Kaiming Ba, 2019. "An Integrated Indicator System and Evaluation Model for Regional Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2183-:d:222024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Lixin & Muduli, Kamalakanta & Barve, Akhilesh, 2015. "Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 15-26.
    2. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan, 2015. "China's regional sustainability and diversified resource allocation: DEA environmental assessment on economic development and air pollution," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 239-256.
    3. de Carvalho, Joaquim Francisco, 2011. "Measuring economic performance, social progress and sustainability using an index," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1073-1079, February.
    4. Ray, Supriya & Ghosh, Biswajit & Bardhan, Suchandra & Bhattacharyya, Bidyut, 2016. "Studies on the impact of energy quality on human development index," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 117-126.
    5. Sala, Serenella & Ciuffo, Biagio & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "A systemic framework for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-325.
    6. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    7. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica & Antomil-Ibias, José, 2014. "Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-17.
    8. Sun, Wei & Xu, Yanfeng, 2016. "Financial security evaluation of the electric power industry in China based on a back propagation neural network optimized by genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-379.
    9. Tsai, Wen-Tien, 2010. "Energy sustainability from analysis of sustainable development indicators: A case study in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 2131-2138, September.
    10. Yao Lu & Xiaoshun Li & Heng Ni & Xin Chen & Chuyu Xia & Dongmei Jiang & Huiping Fan, 2019. "Temporal-Spatial Evolution of the Urban Ecological Footprint Based on Net Primary Productivity: A Case Study of Xuzhou Central Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Vlontzos, G. & Pardalos, P.M., 2017. "Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 155-162.
    12. Liu, Gang, 2014. "Development of a general sustainability indicator for renewable energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 611-621.
    13. Vera, Ivan & Langlois, Lucille, 2007. "Energy indicators for sustainable development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 875-882.
    14. Guangdong Wu , & Kaifeng Duan & Jian Zuo & Xianbo Zhao & Daizhong Tang, 2017. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Public Rental Housing Community Based on a Hybrid Method of AHP-Entropy Weight and Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Zeng, Yu-Rong & Zeng, Yi & Choi, Beomjin & Wang, Lin, 2017. "Multifactor-influenced energy consumption forecasting using enhanced back-propagation neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 381-396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaser Kanani Maman & Abbas Maleki, 2022. "Energy Mix Optimization from Energy Security Perspective Based on Stochastic Models," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8.
    2. Yang Yang & Suocheng Dong & Tamir Boldanov & Fujia Li & Hao Cheng & Qian Liu & Yu Li & Zehong Li, 2021. "Construction of the Primorsky No. 1 and No. 2 International Transport Corridors: Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Attila Buzási & Bettina Szimonetta Jäger, 2021. "Exploratory Analysis of Urban Sustainability by Applying a Strategy-Based Tailor-Made Weighting Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Amina Chanysheva & Pierre Kopp & Natalia Romasheva & Anni Nikulina, 2021. "Migration Attractiveness as a Factor in the Development of the Russian Arctic Mineral Resource Potential," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Hania Rahma & Akhmad Fauzi & Bambang Juanda & Bambang Widjojanto, 2019. "Development of a Composite Measure of Regional Sustainable Development in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Madeleine Aguilar-Morocho & Tatiana García-Segura & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Study of Social and Environmental Needs for the Selection of Sustainable Criteria in the Procurement of Public Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Siudek, Tomasz & Gradziuk, Piotr & Drabarczyk, Catherine, 2024. "The concept of measuring and assessing sustainable local development on the example of counties in the Masovian Voivodeship," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 202(1), February.
    8. Fahad Bin Abdullah & Rizwan Iqbal & Sadique Ahmad & Mohammed A. El-Affendi & Maria Abdullah, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of Sustainable Energy Security for Energy Policy Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Keihan Hassanzadehkermanshahi & Sara Shirowzhan, 2022. "Measuring Urban Sustainability over Time at National and Regional Scale for Addressing United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11: Iran and Tehran as Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Abdulla Alabbasi & Jhuma Sadhukhan & Matthew Leach & Mohammed Sanduk, 2022. "Sustainable Indicators for Integrating Renewable Energy in Bahrain’s Power Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Yuexiang Yang & Xiaoyu Zheng & Zhen Sun, 2020. "Coal Resource Security Assessment in China: A Study Using Entropy-Weight-Based TOPSIS and BP Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan, Mei-Hua & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2020. "Developing indicators for the monitoring of the sustainability of food, energy, and water," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Massimiliano Agovino & Antonio Garofalo & Antonio Angelo Romano & Giuseppe Scandurra, 2018. "Explanatory analysis of the key factors in an energy sustainability index," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2597-2632, November.
    3. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Magdalena Ligus & Piotr Peternek, 2021. "The Sustainable Energy Development Index—An Application for European Union Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    5. Iddrisu, Insah & Bhattacharyya, Subhes C., 2015. "Sustainable Energy Development Index: A multi-dimensional indicator for measuring sustainable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 513-530.
    6. Stefan Dragos Cîrstea & Calin Moldovan-Teselios & Andreea Cîrstea & Antoniu Claudiu Turcu & Cosmin Pompei Darab, 2018. "Evaluating Renewable Energy Sustainability by Composite Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Rafael Ninno Muniz & Stéfano Frizzo Stefenon & William Gouvêa Buratto & Ademir Nied & Luiz Henrique Meyer & Erlon Cristian Finardi & Ricardo Marino Kühl & José Alberto Silva de Sá & Brigida Ramati Per, 2020. "Tools for Measuring Energy Sustainability: A Comparative Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Peter Bindzár, 2021. "Assessing the Level of Energy and Climate Sustainability in the European Union Countries in the Context of the European Green Deal Strategy and Agenda 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    9. Assed Haddad & Ahmed Hammad & Danielle Castro & Diego Vasco & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2021. "Framework for Assessing Urban Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    11. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Yan Yuan & Aijun Li & Daoping Wang, 2017. "Social Sustainability of Provinces in China: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Window Analysis under the Concepts of Natural and Managerial Disposability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Wen-Tien Tsai, 2017. "Green public procurement and green-mark products strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions—experience from Taiwan," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 729-742, June.
    13. Li, Chong-Mao & Nie, Rui, 2017. "An evaluating system for scientific mining of China's coal resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 317-327.
    14. Koray Altintas & Ozalp Vayvay & Sinan Apak & Emine Cobanoglu, 2020. "An Extended GRA Method Integrated with Fuzzy AHP to Construct a Multidimensional Index for Ranking Overall Energy Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & MacGill, Iain F. & Nakawiro, Thanawat, 2012. "Assessing the sustainability challenges for electricity industries in ASEAN newly industrialising countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2217-2233.
    16. Ebrahimi, Mehri & Rahmani, Donya, 2019. "A five-dimensional approach to sustainability for prioritizing energy production systems using a revised GRA method: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 345-354.
    17. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2019. "A Dynamic Sustainability Analysis of Energy Landscapes in Egypt: A Spatial Agent-Based Model Combined with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 22(1), pages 1-4.
    18. Zhao, Ting & Yang, Zhenshan, 2017. "Towards green growth and management: Relative efficiency and gaps of Chinese cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 481-494.
    19. Pingtao Yi & Lu Wang & Danning Zhang & Weiwei Li, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of Provincial-Level Regions in China Using Composite Sustainable Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Sarangi, Gopal K. & Mishra, Arabinda & Chang, Youngho & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2019. "Indian electricity sector, energy security and sustainability: An empirical assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2183-:d:222024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.