IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p2116-d221297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Analysis of Brand as Symbol, Perceived Transaction Value, Perceived Acquisition Value and Customer Loyalty Using Structural Equation Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Huang Ning Lee

    (Department of Food & Beverage Management, Toko University, Puzi 61363, Taiwan)

  • An Sheng Lee

    (Department of Wood-Based Materials and Design, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 60004, Taiwan)

  • Yo Wen Liang

    (Department of Visual Communication Design, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei 24301, Taiwan)

Abstract

Today consumers’ demands and choices of products or services are constantly changing rapidly in the internet environment of information technology. The markets emphasize quality, service, and customization, which has been changing the consumption patterns in the decision-making process or companies’ production patterns. The enterprises are essential to respond the changes of the consumption side and production side in order to achieve sustainable development. Moreover, it is important to focus on the relationship of interaction with consumers. This study was intended to explore the influence of brand as symbol on consumer behavior to understand the relations between brand as symbol, perceived transaction value, perceived acquisition value, message-response involvement, and customer loyalty. The empirical analysis is performed by using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), including measurement and structural models. The measurement models are examined with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to identify the relations between latent variables and observed variables whereas the structural models are used to find out the relations between latent variables. Meanwhile, path analysis is adopted to understand the influence between the variables. A questionnaire survey was carried out on customers of chain beverage stores in the Chiayi area through convenient sampling 400 copies were administered and 387 valid samples were retrieved. The response rate was 97%. The results indicate that brand as symbol has significant positive influence on perceived transaction value, perceived acquisition value, and customer loyalty. This means brand as symbol alone can have an effect on customer loyalty and will not be influenced by the level of message-response involvement. This conclusion can be applied to help brand managers to establish close relations with consumers when performing brand design.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang Ning Lee & An Sheng Lee & Yo Wen Liang, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis of Brand as Symbol, Perceived Transaction Value, Perceived Acquisition Value and Customer Loyalty Using Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2116-:d:221297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoo, Jungmin & Park, Minjung, 2016. "The effects of e-mass customization on consumer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty toward luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5775-5784.
    2. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    3. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Audrey Azoulay, 2003. "Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality?," Post-Print hal-00781544, HAL.
    4. Aaker, Jennifer & Benet-Martinez, Veronica & Garolera, Jordi, 2001. "Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs," Research Papers 1668r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gyorgy Gonda & Eva Gorgenyi-Hegyes & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 2020. "Competitive Factors of Fashion Retail Sector with Special Focus on SMEs," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, November.
    2. María de los Ángeles Pérez-Sánchez & Zhuowei Tian & Almudena Barrientos-Báez & José Gómez-Galán & Hanliang Li, 2021. "Blockchain Technology for Winning Consumer Loyalty: Social Norm Analysis Using Structural Equation Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oana Țugulea, 2017. "City Brand Personality—Relations with Dimensions and Dimensions Inter-Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Sven Tischer, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2012-064, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    3. Ralf van der Lans & Bram Van den Bergh & Evelien Dieleman, 2014. "Partner Selection in Brand Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Drivers of Brand Fit," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 551-566, July.
    4. WooHyuk Kim & Kristin Malek & NamJo Kim & SeungHyun “James” Kim, 2017. "Destination Personality, Destination Image, and Intent to Recommend: The Role of Gender, Age, Cultural Background, and Prior Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Yi Xie & Siqing Peng & Daniel P. Hampson, 0. "Brand user imagery clarity (BUIC): conceptualization, measurement, and consequences," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    6. Geuens, Maggie & Weijters, Bert & De Wulf, Kristof, 2009. "A new measure of brand personality," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 97-107.
    7. Vinod Kumar Bishnoi & Ajay Kumar, 2016. "Aaker’s brand personality scale is not universal – Explanation and reasons for bikes in India," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 14-27, March.
    8. Avis, Mark, 2012. "Brand personality factor based models: A critical review," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 89-96.
    9. Ewa Glińska & Oleg Gorbaniuk, 2016. "Restrictions on the use of the Aaker model in the measurement of city brand personality: The sender’s perspective," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 46-58, February.
    10. Bo Liang & Ye Wang, 2023. "Using integrated marketing communications to promote country personality via government websites," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 79-92, March.
    11. Vytautas Dikcius & Eleonora Seimiene & Ramunas Casas, 2018. "Brand Personality Scale: Is It Applicable For A Small Emerging Country?," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(2).
    12. Chiang, Lan-Lung (Luke) & Yang, Chin-Sheng, 2018. "Does country-of-origin brand personality generate retail customer lifetime value? A Big Data analytics approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 177-187.
    13. Rajesh Sharma, 2020. "Building Consumer-based Brand Equity for Fast Fashion Apparel Brands in the Indian Consumer Market," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 45(3), pages 337-365, August.
    14. Michele Gorgoglione & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Umberto Panniello, 2018. "Innovation through tradition in the Italian coffee industry: an analysis of customers’ perceptions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 661-682, July.
    15. Milas, Goran & Mlacic, Boris, 2007. "Brand personality and human personality: Findings from ratings of familiar Croatian brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 620-626, June.
    16. Ranfagni, Silvia & Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda & Faraoni, Monica, 2016. "How to Measure Alignment in Perceptions of Brand Personality Within Online Communities: Interdisciplinary Insights," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 70-85.
    17. Japutra, Arnold & Molinillo, Sebastian, 2019. "Responsible and active brand personality: On the relationships with brand experience and key relationship constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 464-471.
    18. Lara-Rodríguez, Juan Sebastián & Rojas-Contreras, Camilo & Duque Oliva, Edison Jair, 2019. "Discovering emerging research topics for brand personality: A bibliometric analysis," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 261-272.
    19. Kevin Lane Keller & Donald R. Lehmann, 2006. "Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 740-759, 11-12.
    20. Theo Lieven, 2017. "How to create reproducible brand personality scales," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(6), pages 592-608, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2116-:d:221297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.