IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i11p203-d1282722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coupled Price–Volume Equity Models with Auto-Induced Regime Switching

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel L. Esquível

    (Department of Mathematics, FCT NOVA, and Nova Math, New University of Lisbon, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal)

  • Nadezhda P. Krasii

    (Department of Mathematics, FCT NOVA, and Nova Math, New University of Lisbon, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal
    Department of of Higher Mathematics, Don State Technical University, Gagarin Square 1, Rostov-on-Don 344000, Russia)

  • Pedro P. Mota

    (Department of Mathematics, FCT NOVA, and Nova Math, New University of Lisbon, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal)

  • Victoria V. Shamraeva

    (Department of Data Analysis and Machine Learning, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Leningradsky Prospekt, 49, Moscow 125993, Russia)

Abstract

In this work, we present a rigorous development of a model for the Price–Volume relationship of transactions introduced in 2009. For this development, we rely on the precise formulation of diffusion auto-induced regime-switching models presented in our previous work of 2020. The auto-induced regime-switching models referred to may be based on a finite set of stochastic differential equations (SDE)—all defined on the same bounded time interval—and a sequence of interlacing stopping times defined by the hitting threshold times of the trajectories of the solutions of the SDE. The coupling between price and volume—which we take as a proxy of liquidity—is assumed to be the following: the regime switching in the price variable occurs at the stopping times for which there is a change of region—in the product state space of price and liquidity—for the liquidity variable (and vice versa). The regimes may be defined parametrically—that is, the SDE coefficients keep the same functional form but with varying parameters—or the functional form of the SDE coefficients may change with each regime. By using the same noise source for both the price and the liquidity regime-switching models—volume (liquidity), which, in general, is not a tradable asset—we ensure that despite incorporating information on liquidity, the price part of the coupled model can be assumed to be arbitrage free and complete, allowing the pricing and hedging of derivatives in a simple way.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel L. Esquível & Nadezhda P. Krasii & Pedro P. Mota & Victoria V. Shamraeva, 2023. "Coupled Price–Volume Equity Models with Auto-Induced Regime Switching," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:203-:d:1282722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/11/203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/11/203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoine Lejay & Paolo Pigato, 2019. "A Threshold Model For Local Volatility: Evidence Of Leverage And Mean Reversion Effects On Historical Data," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Paolo Pigato, 2019. "Extreme at-the-money skew in a local volatility model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 827-859, October.
    3. Company, Rafael & Jódar, Lucas & Pintos, José-Ramón, 2012. "A consistent stable numerical scheme for a nonlinear option pricing model in illiquid markets," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(10), pages 1972-1985.
    4. Jones, Charles M & Kaul, Gautam & Lipson, Marc L, 1994. "Transactions, Volume, and Volatility," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 7(4), pages 631-651.
    5. Schwartz, Eduardo S, 1997. "The Stochastic Behavior of Commodity Prices: Implications for Valuation and Hedging," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(3), pages 923-973, July.
    6. Kristoffer Glover & Peter W Duck & David P Newton, 2010. "On nonlinear models of markets with finite liquidity: Some cautionary notes," Published Paper Series 2010-5, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    7. Oana-Maria Georgescu & Dimitrios Laliotis & Miha Leber & Javier Población, 2020. "A Liquidity Shortfall Analysis Framework for the European Banking Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Epps, Thomas W, 1975. "Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 65(4), pages 586-597, September.
    9. Ziming Dong & Dan Tang & Xingchun Wang, 2023. "Pricing vulnerable basket spread options with liquidity risk," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 23-50, April.
    10. Cuoco, Domenico & Cvitanic, Jaksa, 1998. "Optimal consumption choices for a 'large' investor," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 401-436, March.
    11. Tauchen, George E & Pitts, Mark, 1983. "The Price Variability-Volume Relationship on Speculative Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 485-505, March.
    12. Epps, Thomas W & Epps, Mary Lee, 1976. "The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture-of-Distributions Hypothesis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 305-321, March.
    13. Karpoff, Jonathan M., 1987. "The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 109-126, March.
    14. Eleonora Kontuš & Damir Mihanović, 2019. "Management of liquidity and liquid assets in small and medium-sized enterprises," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 3253-3271, January.
    15. Pedro P. Mota & Manuel L. Esquível, 2016. "Model selection for stock prices data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(16), pages 2977-2987, December.
    16. Johnson, Timothy C., 2008. "Volume, liquidity, and liquidity risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 388-417, February.
    17. Umut Çetin & L. C. G. Rogers, 2007. "Modeling Liquidity Effects In Discrete Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 15-29, January.
    18. Antoine Lejay & Paolo Pigato, 2017. "Data and methods for A threshold model for local volatility: evidence of leverage and mean reversion effects on historical data [Données et méthodes pour "A threshold model for local volatilit," Working Papers hal-01668975, HAL.
    19. Liu, Hong & Yong, Jiongmin, 2005. "Option pricing with an illiquid underlying asset market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2125-2156, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuang, Wen-I & Liu, Hsiang-Hsi & Susmel, Rauli, 2012. "The bivariate GARCH approach to investigating the relation between stock returns, trading volume, and return volatility," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-15.
    2. Jinliang Li, 2016. "When noise trading fades, volatility rises," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 475-512, October.
    3. Do, Hung Xuan & Brooks, Robert & Treepongkaruna, Sirimon & Wu, Eliza, 2014. "How does trading volume affect financial return distributions?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 190-206.
    4. Avouyi-Dovi, S. & Jondeau, E. & Lai Tong, C., 1997. "Effets “volume”, volatilité et transmissions internationales sur les marchés boursiers dans le G5," Working papers 42, Banque de France.
    5. Álvaro Cartea & Thilo Meyer-Brandis, 2010. "How Duration Between Trades of Underlying Securities Affects Option Prices," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 14(4), pages 749-785.
    6. Anthony Murphy & Marwan Izzeldin, 2005. "Order Flow, Transaction Clock, and Normality of Asset Returns: A Comment on Ané and Geman (2000)," Finance 0512005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Michael J. Fleming & Eli M. Remolona, 1996. "Price formation and liquidity in the U.S. treasuries market: evidence from intraday patterns around announcements," Research Paper 9633, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    8. Rodriguez, E. & Alvarez-Ramirez, J., 2021. "Time-varying cross-correlation between trading volume and returns in US stock markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    9. Danilova, Albina & Julliard, Christian, 2014. "Information asymmetries, volatility, liquidity, and the Tobin Tax," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60957, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Sarika Mahajan & Balwinder Singh, 2008. "An Empirical Analysis of Stock Price-Volume Relationship in Indian Stock Market," Vision, , vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, July.
    11. Slim, Skander & Dahmene, Meriam, 2016. "Asymmetric information, volatility components and the volume–volatility relationship for the CAC40 stocks," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 70-84.
    12. Karaa, Rabaa & Slim, Skander & Hmaied, Dorra Mezzez, 2018. "Trading intensity and the volume-volatility relationship on the Tunis Stock Exchange," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 88-99.
    13. Sam Howison & David Lamper, 2001. "Trading volume in models of financial derivatives," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 119-135.
    14. Álvaro Cartea & Dimitrios Karyampas, 2016. "The Relationship between the Volatility of Returns and the Number of Jumps in Financial Markets," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 929-950, June.
    15. repec:lan:wpaper:3326 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:lan:wpaper:3050 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:lan:wpaper:3048 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Manganelli, Simone, 2005. "Duration, volume and volatility impact of trades," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 377-399, November.
    19. Doojin RYU & Hyein SHIM, 2017. "Intraday Dynamics of Asset Returns, Trading Activities, and Implied Volatilities: A Trivariate GARCH Framework," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 45-61, June.
    20. Ling-Yun He & Sheng Yang & Wen-Si Xie & Zhi-Hong Han, 2014. "Contemporaneous and Asymmetric Properties in the Price-Volume Relationships in China's Agricultural Futures Markets," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(S1), pages 148-166.
    21. Marwan Izzeldin, 2007. "Trading volume and the number of trades," Working Papers 584864, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    22. Madarassy Akin, Rita, 2003. "Maturity Effects in Futures Markets: Evidence from Eleven Financial Futures Markets," Santa Cruz Center for International Economics, Working Paper Series qt1n04g31b, Center for International Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    23. Ahadzie, Richard Mawulawoe & Jeyasreedharan, Nagaratnam, 2020. "Trading volume and realized higher-order moments in the Australian stock market," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:203-:d:1282722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.