IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v3y2014i3p544-574d39744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource Use in the Production and Consumption System—The MIPS Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Christa Liedtke

    (Research Group Sustainable Production and Consumption, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 10 04 80, Wuppertal 42004, Germany
    Design Faculty, Folkwang University of the Arts, Klemensborn 39, 45239 Essen, Germany)

  • Katrin Bienge

    (Research Group Sustainable Production and Consumption, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 10 04 80, Wuppertal 42004, Germany)

  • Klaus Wiesen

    (Research Group Sustainable Production and Consumption, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 10 04 80, Wuppertal 42004, Germany)

  • Jens Teubler

    (Research Group Sustainable Production and Consumption, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 10 04 80, Wuppertal 42004, Germany)

  • Kathrin Greiff

    (Research Group Sustainable Production and Consumption, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 10 04 80, Wuppertal 42004, Germany)

  • Michael Lettenmeier

    (Research Group Sustainable Production and Consumption, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 10 04 80, Wuppertal 42004, Germany
    Department of Design, Aalto University, Hämeentie 135 C, 00760 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Holger Rohn

    (Research Group Sustainable Production and Consumption, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, P.O. Box 10 04 80, Wuppertal 42004, Germany
    Faktor 10-Institut für nachhaltiges Wirtschaften gemeinnützige GmbH, Alte Bahnhofstraße 13, 61169 Friedberg, Germany)

Abstract

The concept Material Input per Service Unit (MIPS) was developed 20 years ago as a measure for the overall natural resource use of products and services. The material intensity analysis is used to calculate the material footprint of any economic activities in production and consumption. Environmental assessment has developed extensive databases for life cycle inventories, which can additionally be adopted for material intensity analysis. Based on practical experience in measuring material footprints on the micro level, this paper presents the current state of research and methodology development: it shows the international discussions on the importance of accounting methodologies to measure progress in resource efficiency. The MIPS approach is presented and its micro level application for assessing value chains, supporting business management, and operationalizing sustainability strategies is discussed. Linkages to output-oriented Life Cycle Assessment as well as to Material Flow Analysis (MFA) at the macro level are pointed out. Finally we come to the conclusion that the MIPS approach provides relevant knowledge on resource and energy input at the micro level for fact-based decision-making in science, policy, business, and consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Christa Liedtke & Katrin Bienge & Klaus Wiesen & Jens Teubler & Kathrin Greiff & Michael Lettenmeier & Holger Rohn, 2014. "Resource Use in the Production and Consumption System—The MIPS Approach," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:544-574:d:39744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/3/3/544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/3/3/544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneidewind, Uwe & Palzkill-Vorbeck, Alexandra, 2011. "Suffizienz als Business Case: Nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement als Gegenstand einer transdisziplinären Betriebswirtschaftslehre," Zukunftsimpulse 2, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    2. Mathias Onischka & Christa Liedtke & Nino David Jordan, 2012. "How To Sensitize The Financial Industry To Resource Efficiency Considerations And Climate Change Related Risks," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-26.
    3. Bringezu, Stefan & Schutz, Helmut & Steger, Soren & Baudisch, Jan, 2004. "International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 97-124, November.
    4. Timo Busch & Christa Liedtke, 2006. "Resource Efficiency Accounting," Springer Books, in: Jan Jonker & Marco Witte (ed.), Management Models for Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 33, pages 274-280, Springer.
    5. Klaus Wiesen & Jens Teubler & Holger Rohn, 2013. "Resource Use of Wind Farms in the German North Sea—The Example of Alpha Ventus and Bard Offshore I," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Lettenmeier, Michael & Gobel, Christine & Liedtke, Christa & Rohn, Holger & Teitscheid, Petra, 2012. "Material Footprint of a Sustainable Nutrition System in 2050 – Need for Dynamic Innovations in Production, Consumption and Politics," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144983, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    7. Krausmann, Fridolin & Gingrich, Simone & Eisenmenger, Nina & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Haberl, Helmut & Fischer-Kowalski, Marina, 2009. "Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2696-2705, August.
    8. Christa Liedtke & Johannes Buhl & Najine Ameli, 2013. "Microfoundations for Sustainable Growth with Eco-Intelligent Product Service-Arrangements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Michael Lettenmeier & Christa Liedtke & Holger Rohn, 2014. "Eight Tons of Material Footprint—Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-28, July.
    10. Johan Rockström & Will Steffen & Kevin Noone & Åsa Persson & F. Stuart Chapin & Eric F. Lambin & Timothy M. Lenton & Marten Scheffer & Carl Folke & Hans Joachim Schellnhuber & Björn Nykvist & Cynthia , 2009. "A safe operating space for humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7263), pages 472-475, September.
    11. M. Fischer‐Kowalski & F. Krausmann & S. Giljum & S. Lutter & A. Mayer & S. Bringezu & Y. Moriguchi & H. Schütz & H. Schandl & H. Weisz, 2011. "Methodology and Indicators of Economy‐wide Material Flow Accounting," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(6), pages 855-876, December.
    12. William J. Baumol & Wallace E. Oates, 1971. "The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Peter Bohm & Allen V. Kneese (ed.), The Economics of Environment, pages 53-65, Palgrave Macmillan.
    13. Haas, Armin & Onischka, Mathias & Fucik, Markus, 2013. "Black swans, dragon kings, and Bayesian risk management," Economics Discussion Papers 2013-11, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Kristin Leismann & Martina Schmitt & Holger Rohn & Carolin Baedeker, 2013. "Collaborative Consumption: Towards a Resource-Saving Consumption Culture," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Tuuli Hirvilammi & Senja Laakso & Michael Lettenmeier & Satu Lähteenoja, 2013. "Studying Well-being and its Environmental Impacts: A Case Study of Minimum Income Receivers in Finland," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 134-154, February.
    16. Steinberger, Julia K. & Krausmann, Fridolin & Eisenmenger, Nina, 2010. "Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1148-1158, March.
    17. Raimund Bleischwitz, 2010. "International economics of resource productivity – Relevance, measurement, empirical trends, innovation, resource policies," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 227-244, August.
    18. Sorrell, Steve & Dimitropoulos, John & Sommerville, Matt, 2009. "Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1356-1371, April.
    19. Christa Liedtke & Holger Rohn & Michael Kuhndt & Regina Nickel, 1998. "Applying Material Flow Accounting: Ecoauditing and Resource Management at the Kambium Furniture Workshop," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 2(3), pages 131-147, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingru Liu & Haotong Wu & Xin Tian & Heming Wang & Yinglei Wu, 2022. "Materials footprint of household consumption in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1504-1513, August.
    2. Bülent Sarı & Farhad Zarifi & Muhammed Alhasan & Hakan Güney & Selman Türkeş & Serdal Sırlıbaş & Deniz Civan Yiğit & Güray Kılınççeker & Beşir Şahin & Olcayto Keskinkan, 2023. "Determining the Contributions in a Denim Fabric Production for Sustainable Development Goals: Life Cycle Assessment and Material Input Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia K Steinberger & Fridolin Krausmann & Michael Getzner & Heinz Schandl & Jim West, 2013. "Development and Dematerialization: An International Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Tobias Wendler, 2019. "About the Relationship Between Green Technology and Material Usage," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(3), pages 1383-1423, November.
    3. Wendler, Tobias & Töbelmann, Daniel & Günther, Jutta, 2021. "Natural resources and technology - on the mitigating effect of green tech," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242416, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Fishman, Tomer & Schandl, Heinz & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2015. "The socio-economic drivers of material stock accumulation in Japan's prefectures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 76-84.
    5. Stefan Giljum & Monika Dittrich & Mirko Lieber & Stephan Lutter, 2014. "Global Patterns of Material Flows and their Socio-Economic and Environmental Implications: A MFA Study on All Countries World-Wide from 1980 to 2009," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Tobias Wendler & Daniel Töbelmann & Jutta Günther, 2019. "Natural resources and technology - on the mitigating effect of green tech," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 1905, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    7. Distelkamp, Martin & Meyer, Mark, 2019. "Pathways to a Resource-Efficient and Low-Carbon Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 88-104.
    8. Kovanda, Jan, 2017. "Total residual output flows of the economy: Methodology and application in the case of the Czech Republic," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 61-69.
    9. Zhang, Chao & Chen, Wei-Qiang & Liu, Gang & Zhu, Da-Jian, 2017. "Economic Growth and the Evolution of Material Cycles: An Analytical Framework Integrating Material Flow and Stock Indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 265-274.
    10. Yutong Zhang & Wei Zhou & Danxue Luo, 2023. "The Relationship Research between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth: From Multi-Level Attempts to Key Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Marco Bianchi & Carlos Tapia & Ikerne del Valle, 2020. "Monitoring domestic material consumption at lower territorial levels: A novel data downscaling method," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1074-1087, October.
    12. Mathieu, Valentin & Roda, Jean-Marc, 2023. "A meta-analysis on wood trade flow modeling concepts," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Yoshida, Keisuke & Fishman, Tomer & Okuoka, Keijiro & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2017. "Material stock's overburden: Automatic spatial detection and estimation of domestic extraction and hidden material flows," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 165-175.
    14. González-Val, Rafael & Pueyo, Fernando, 2019. "Natural resources, economic growth and geography," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 150-159.
    15. Dorothée Charlier & Florian Fizaine, 2020. "Does Becoming Richer Lead to a Reduction in Natural Resource Consumption? An Empirical Refutation of the Kuznets Material Curve," Working Papers 2020.05, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    16. Tol, Richard S.J., 2017. "The structure of the climate debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 431-438.
    17. Marina Fischer-Kowalski & Daniel Hausknost, 2014. "Large-scale Societal Transitions in the Past. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 55," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47187, April.
    18. Taiwo Temitope Lasisi & Kayode Kolawole Eluwole & Uju Violet Alola & Luigi Aldieri & Concetto Paolo Vinci & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2021. "Do Tourism Activities and Urbanization Drive Material Consumption in the OECD Countries? A Quantile Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Florian Flachenecker, 2015. "Sustainability, Resource Efficiency and Competitiveness. An Assessment of Resource Efficiency Policies in the European Union," Bruges European Economic Research Papers 32, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    20. Mark Meyer & Martin Hirschnitz-Garbers & Martin Distelkamp, 2018. "Contemporary Resource Policy and Decoupling Trends—Lessons Learnt from Integrated Model-Based Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:544-574:d:39744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.