IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i10p1817-d430288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empowerment Scale Analysis of Mexican MSMEs: Modeling with Covariance Structures

Author

Listed:
  • María de la Cruz del Río-Rama

    (Business Management and Marketing Department, Faculty of Business Sciences and Tourism, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain)

  • Martha Ríos-Manríquez

    (Finance and Administration Department, University of Guanajuato, Guanajuato 38110, Mexico)

  • José Álvarez-García

    (Financial Economy and Accounting Department, Faculty of Business, Finance and Tourism, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández

    (Department of Business, University of A Coruña, Campus de Elviña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain)

Abstract

Trained human capital is a source of incalculable resources, with an impact on the results of companies. For this reason, companies must carefully consider three aspects: empowerment with the consideration of the cognitive state of their collaborators; training and compensation; and fluidity in information sharing. Although granting empowerment to collaborators has been shown to be beneficial for organizations, its adoption has not been popularized. Therefore, it remains a construct that needs to be studied and understood, considering that it is influenced by the organizational culture of companies. In this research, the main objective was to examine the factor structure of the empowerment scale from the perspective of the owner or manager of the micro, small and medium-sized companies of Guanajuato, Mexico; using the dimensions of psychological empowerment; fluidity in information sharing; as well as training and compensation. The methodology is based on the Mathematical Economy; application of mathematical methods to represent theories and analyze problems in economics. This investigation used an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the proposed measurement scale. The sample is made up of 222 valid questionnaires. The CFA provided evidence that the model that best fits the data is a second-order model made up of two dimensions: self-efficacy and influence on the company’s results, which carry the psychological empowerment construct. These results make clear that although information is necessary to train human capital, cognitive variables are more important in the empowerment of human capital.

Suggested Citation

  • María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & Martha Ríos-Manríquez & José Álvarez-García & María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández, 2020. "An Empowerment Scale Analysis of Mexican MSMEs: Modeling with Covariance Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1817-:d:430288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monje Amor, Ariadna & Abeal Vázquez, José Pablo & Faíña, José Andrés, 2020. "Transformational leadership and work engagement: Exploring the mediating role of structural empowerment," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 169-178.
    2. Ríos Manriquez Martha & Téllez Ramírez María del Rayo & Ferrer Guerra Julian, 2010. "El empowerment como predictor del compromiso organizacional en las Pymes," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 55(3), pages 103-125, mayo-agos.
    3. Manjari Singh & Anita Sarkar, 2018. "Role of psychological empowerment in the relationship between structural empowerment and innovative behavior," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 521-538, December.
    4. Robert M. Grant, 1996. "Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 375-387, August.
    5. Julia Schneider & Michael Dowling & Sumita Raghuram, 2007. "Empowerment as a success factor in start-up companies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 167-184, August.
    6. Eric Ng Chee Hong & Lam Zheng Hao & Ramesh Kumar & Charles Ramendran & Vimala Kadiresan, 2012. "The Effectiveness of Human Resource Management Practices," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 3(2), pages 60-79, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuliani, Elisa & Martinelli, Arianna & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2016. "Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 192-205.
    2. Anaf Abdulkarem & Wenhua Hou, 2022. "The Influence of the Environment on Cross-Border E-Commerce Adoption Levels Among SMEs in China: The Mediating Role of Organizational Context," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    3. Rana, Mohammad B. & Elo, Maria, 2017. "Transnational Diaspora and Civil Society Actors Driving MNE Internationalisation: The Case of Grameenphone in Bangladesh," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 87-106.
    4. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    5. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Ann Majchrzak, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Vigilant Interaction in Knowledge Collaboration: Challenges of Online User Participation Under Ambivalence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 773-784, December.
    6. Ludivine Ravat & Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Sandrine Hollet-Haudebert, 2023. "Data-driven innovation capability of marketing: an exploratory study of its components and underlying processes," Post-Print hal-04151199, HAL.
    7. Groza, Mark D. & Groza, Mya Pronschinske, 2018. "Salesperson regulatory knowledge and sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 37-46.
    8. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    9. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia & Liu, Yipeng & Glaister, Keith W., 2016. "Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 66-75.
    10. Emil Inauen & Katja Rost & Margit Osterloh & Bruno S. Frey, 2010. "Back to the Future –A Monastic Perspective on Corporate Governance," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 21(1), pages 38-59.
    11. Malik, Ashish & Mahadevan, Jasmin & Sharma, Piyush & Nguyen, Tuyet-Mai, 2021. "Masking, claiming and preventing innovation in cross-border B2B relationships: Neo-colonial frameworks of power in global IT industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 327-339.
    12. Fu, Xiaolan, 2012. "How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 512-523.
    13. George A Shinkle & Jo-Ann Suchard, 2019. "Innovation in newly public firms: The influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 248-281, May.
    14. Yuselim Angélica Villa Hernández & Virginia Hernández Silva & Jazmín Lubina Ávalos Arias, 2019. "El Capital Intelectual en las PYMEs," Revista de la Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, vol. 4(7), pages 32-40, Enero.
    15. Sai Yayavaram & Wei-Ru Chen, 2015. "Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of technological complexity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 377-396, March.
    16. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    17. Izabela Kowalik & Lidia Danik & Petr Král & Hana Řezanková, 2017. "Antecedents of Accelerated Internationalisation of Polish and Czech Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 31-48.
    18. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    19. Weiling Ke & Lele Kang & Chuan-Hoo Tan & Chih-Hung Peng, 2021. "User Competence with Enterprise Systems: The Effects of Work Environment Factors," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 860-875, September.
    20. Bulent Akkaya & Anna Bagieńska, 2022. "The Role of Agile Women Leadership in Achieving Team Effectiveness through Interpersonal Trust for Business Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1817-:d:430288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.