IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p855-d832677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do the New Residential Areas in Bucharest Satisfy Population Demands, and Where Do They Fall Short?

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Preda

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1. Blv. Nicolae Bălcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Iuliana Vijulie

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1. Blv. Nicolae Bălcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1. Blv. Nicolae Bălcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marta Jurchescu

    (Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy, 12 Dimitrie Racoviță, 023993 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alina Mareci

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1. Blv. Nicolae Bălcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alexandru Preda

    (National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management (INHGA), 97E București-Ploiești, 013686 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In recent years, Bucharest’s residential dynamics have thrived, fueled by growing demand and an insufficient housing fund. This study aimed to analyze the residential satisfaction of those living in newly built dwellings. Its objectives were to identify the characteristics of three new residential areas and analyze the satisfaction level among residents regarding both their dwellings and neighborhoods. The investigation employed direct observations during the fieldwork phase (through observation sheets and mapping methods) and surveys (through questionnaires with residents and interviews with developers). Its results highlighted spaces that exhibit an increase in residential constructions, with a tendency to expand toward suburban areas, without necessarily meeting legislative requirements. When measuring the population’s residential satisfaction level, the study observed a general satisfaction regarding dwellings’ modernity and price but noticeable differences within the sample residential nuclei. The solutions proposed by residents mainly target authorities, who were held responsible for developing the urban infrastructure prior to granting building permits, as well as for vetting developers better and requiring them to respect the legislation. Hence, scientists, local authorities, real-estate developers and the local population represent the beneficiaries of the current study’s results.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Preda & Iuliana Vijulie & Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Marta Jurchescu & Alina Mareci & Alexandru Preda, 2022. "How Do the New Residential Areas in Bucharest Satisfy Population Demands, and Where Do They Fall Short?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:855-:d:832677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Günter Herfert & Carola Silvia Neugebauer & Christian Smigiel, 2013. "Living In Residential Satisfaction? Insights From Large-Scale Housing Estates In Central And Eastern Europe," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(1), pages 57-74, February.
    2. Bianca Mitrică & Paul Şerban & Irena Mocanu & Ines Grigorescu & Nicoleta Damian & Monica Dumitraşcu, 2020. "Social Development and Regional Disparities in the Rural Areas of Romania: Focus on the Social Disadvantaged Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 67-89, November.
    3. Pengyan Wang & Xiaofei Qin & Yurui Li, 2021. "Satisfaction Evaluation of Rural Human Settlements in Northwest China: Method and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Ana Paula Barreira & Luís Catela Nunes & Maria Helena Guimarães & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2019. "Satisfied but thinking about leaving: the reasons behind residential satisfaction and residential attractiveness in shrinking Portuguese cities," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 67-87, January.
    5. Olfindo, Rosechin, 2021. "Transport accessibility, residential satisfaction, and moving intention in a context of limited travel mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 153-166.
    6. Caplan, Arthur J. & Akhundjanov, Sherzod B. & Toll, Kristopher, 2021. "Measuring heterogeneous preferences for residential amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Alain Bertaud, 2006. "The spatial structures of Central and Eastern European cities," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 5, pages 91-110, Springer.
    8. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    9. Cho, Youngtae & Park, Gil-Sung & Echevarria-Cruz, Samuel, 2005. "Perceived neighborhood characteristics and the health of adult Koreans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 1285-1297, March.
    10. Florentina ION & Daniela PIRVU, 2015. "Territorial Discrepancies In The Rural-Urban Fringe Zone Of Bucharest," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 14(1), pages 56-63.
    11. Piotr Maleszyk & Arleta Kedra, 2020. "Intention to move and residential satisfaction: evidence from Poland," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 15(2), pages 341-360, June.
    12. Greenberg, Michael & Crossney, Kristen, 2007. "Perceived neighborhood quality in the United States: Measuring outdoor, housing and jurisdictional influences," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 181-194, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Amira-Andreea Sava & Camelia Teodorescu & Aurel Gheorghilaş & Mioara Clius, 2022. "Sport Event Tourism in Bucharest. UEFA EURO 2020 Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, November.
    2. Gábor László Vasárus & József Lennert, 2022. "Suburbanization within City Limits in Hungary—A Challenge for Environmental and Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    3. Karina Soubra & Camilla Tamworth & Zeast Kamal & Clare Brook & Dawn Langdon & Jo Billings, 2023. "Health and social care workers experiences of coping while working in the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic: One year on," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Şahika Simsek-Cetinkaya & Simge Evrenol Ocal, 2023. "“Psychological Injuries Are Not Visible†: Experiences and Perceptions of Midwives and Nurses about Domestic Violence during Pregnancy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(8), pages 1115-1123, November.
    5. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    7. Annette Peart & Virginia Lewis & Chris Barton & Grant Russell, 2020. "Healthcare professionals providing care coordination to people living with multimorbidity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2317-2328, July.
    8. Soo-Yong Shin & Eun-Ju Lim, 2021. "Clinical Work and Life of Mid-Career Male Nurses: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.
    9. Fatoumata Fofana & Pat Bazeley & Antoine Regnault, 2020. "Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Daniela Argento & Özgün Imre & Michael Johansson & Kari Rönkkö, 2025. "Facing sustainable city challenges: the quest for attra-chment," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 31-43, March.
    11. Nuchjarin Intalar & Yasushi Ueki & Chawalit Jeenanunta, 2024. "Enhancing Competitiveness: Driving and Facilitating Factors for Industry 4.0 Adoption in Thai Manufacturing," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Thomas Dax & Oliver Tamme, 2023. "Attractive Landscape Features as Drivers for Sustainable Mountain Tourism Experiences," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Dimitrios Gouglas & Kendall Hoyt & Elizabeth Peacocke & Aristidis Kaloudis & Trygve Ottersen & John-Arne Røttingen, 2019. "Setting Strategic Objectives for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations: An Exploratory Decision Analysis Process," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 430-446, November.
    14. Matthys, Marie-Luise & Acharya, Sushant & Khatri, Sanjaya, 2021. "“Before cardamom, we used to face hardship”: Analyzing agricultural commercialization effects in Nepal through a local concept of the Good Life," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Jinliu Chen & Paola Pellegrini & Haoqi Wang, 2022. "Comparative Residents’ Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration—The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Radomska Joanna & Hajdas Monika & Wołczek Przemysław & Glinka Beata, 2023. "Wide open? Creative industries and open strategizing challenges," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(2), pages 117-136, June.
    17. Stephanie W. Lee & Jing Xu & Tai-Ming Wut & Yui-Yip Lau & Joseph H. L. Chan & Tin-Shing Liu & Louis W. Y. Mok & Jason K. Y. Chan, 2024. "Aging in Place in Hong Kong and Its Implications for Sustainable Development: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Needs, Beliefs, Behaviors, and Well-Being of Older Adults through Self-Determination The," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Shailaja Tetali & Sureshkumar Kamalakannan & Shilpa Sadanand & Melissa Glenda Lewis & Sara Varughese & Annie Hans & G. V. S. Murthy, 2022. "Evaluation of the Impact of the First Wave of COVID-19 and Associated Lockdown Restrictions on Persons with Disabilities in 14 States of India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Habib, Muhammad Danish & Attri, Rekha & Salam, Mohammad Asif & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2025. "Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. John R. Blakeman & Wendy M. Woith & Kim S. Astroth & Sheryl H. Jenkins & Stephen J. Stapleton, 2020. "A qualitative exploration of prodromal myocardial infarction fatigue experienced by women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3882-3895, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:855-:d:832677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.