IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i8p813-d607068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfaction Evaluation of Rural Human Settlements in Northwest China: Method and Application

Author

Listed:
  • Pengyan Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Xiaofei Qin

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Degraded and Unused Land Consolidation Engineering, Beijing 100101, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yurui Li

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Degraded and Unused Land Consolidation Engineering, Beijing 100101, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Rural human settlements are an integral part of a rural system. The evaluation of public feedback based on farmers’ satisfaction is a crucial way to understand the current situation of rural human settlements. This paper establishes a framework to evaluate local dwellers’ satisfaction towards the environment of rural human settlements in northwest China from six dimensions involving living conditions, the environment, physical infrastructure, public service, governance, and culture. The empirical study was conducted in Yanchi County, which demonstrates the applicability of this evaluating method. This study shows that the overall degree of satisfaction towards the environment of rural human settlements is relatively high, with a figure of 77.38. However, the satisfaction scores for the six dimensions are uneven, and there are significant differences between the villages. Further, these villages can be divided into three types according to the residents’ satisfaction, and viable strategies are suggested correspondingly. To sustain rural settlement development, the authors argue that more efforts should be put into technology advancement, public participation incentives, and the subsequent maintenance of projects in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengyan Wang & Xiaofei Qin & Yurui Li, 2021. "Satisfaction Evaluation of Rural Human Settlements in Northwest China: Method and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:813-:d:607068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qianyi Wang & Kee Cheok Cheong & Yurui Li, 2020. "Who Benefits From Development? Analyzing the Stakeholder Contestations in a Traditional Settlement of Malaysia," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 861-877, September.
    2. Cheng Wang & Meijing Ren & Haoying Li & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2019. "Understanding the Rural Production Space System: A Case Study in Jiangjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Sergio Rey & Alan Murray & Luc Anselin, 2011. "Visualizing regional income distribution dynamics," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 81-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xue Bai & Zhaoyu Xie & Bart Julien Dewancker, 2022. "Exploring the Factors Affecting User Satisfaction in Poverty Alleviation Relocation Housing for Minorities through Post-Occupancy Evaluation: A Case Study of Pu’er," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Zhou, Liang & Chen, Wei & Xu, Shang, 2022. "Do rural residents care about domestic waste management? A hedonic analysis of housing prices in rural China," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322212, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Hejie Wei & Yingying Gao & Qing Han & Ling Li & Xiaobin Dong & Mengxue Liu & Qingxiang Meng, 2022. "Quality Evaluation and Obstacle Identification of Human Settlements in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Based on Multi-Source Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Jing Chen & Cheng Wang & Ruilian Dai & Shuang Xu & Yue Shen & Mengzhu Ji, 2021. "Practical Village Planning Strategy of Different Types of Villages—A Case Study of 38 Villages in Shapingba District, Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Rui Song & Xueming Li, 2023. "Urban Human Settlement Vulnerability Evolution and Mechanisms: The Case of Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Hao Mei & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Xiaofeng Yang & Chunjian Wang & Wenheng Li & Suhua Yang, 2022. "Evaluation and Optimization Model of Rural Settlement Habitability in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Lu Ye & Zihao Wu & Ting Wang & Kangle Ding & Yu Chen, 2022. "Villagers’ Satisfaction Evaluation System of Rural Human Settlement Construction: Empirical Study of Suzhou in China’s Rapid Urbanization Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Chuanglin Fang & Haitao Ma & Chao Bao & Zhenbo Wang & Guangdong Li & Siao Sun & Yupeng Fan, 2022. "Urban–rural human settlements in China: Objective evaluation and subjective well-being," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Jinliu Chen & Paola Pellegrini & Haoqi Wang, 2022. "Comparative Residents’ Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration—The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Jieyong Wang & Yu Zhang, 2021. "Analysis on the Evolution of Rural Settlement Pattern and Its Influencing Factors in China from 1995 to 2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Wenjun Li & Peng Li & Zhiming Feng & Chiwei Xiao, 2022. "GIS-Based Modeling of Human Settlement Suitability for the Belt and Road Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Mihaela Preda & Iuliana Vijulie & Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Marta Jurchescu & Alina Mareci & Alexandru Preda, 2022. "How Do the New Residential Areas in Bucharest Satisfy Population Demands, and Where Do They Fall Short?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Zhang & Jinghu Pan, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Factors of Urban Sprawl in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Andrés Vallone & Coro Chasco, 2020. "Spatiotemporal methods for analysis of urban system dynamics: an application to Chile," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(2), pages 421-454, April.
    3. Hongji Chen & Qingyuan Yang & Kangchuan Su & Haozhe Zhang & Dan Lu & Hui Xiang & Lulu Zhou, 2021. "Identification and Optimization of Production-Living-Ecological Space in an Ecological Foundation Area in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Case Study of Jiangjin District of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Davide FIASCHI & Lisa GIANMOENA & Angela PARENTI, 2014. "Local Directional Moran Scatter Plot - Ldms," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 40, pages 97-112.
    5. Yilin Chen & Dohèto Othniel Kpoviessi & Harry Aginta, 2023. "Investigating regional income convergence in China: an exploratory spatio-temporal perspective," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Terry Gregory & Roberto Patuelli, 2015. "Demographic ageing and the polarization of regions—an exploratory space–time analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(5), pages 1192-1210, May.
    7. Xiang Li & Shuang Xu & Yecui Hu, 2020. "Understanding the Rural Livelihood Stability System: The Eco-Migration in Huanjiang County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Lintao Chen & Xiaohong Chen & Wei Pan & Ying Wang & Yongle An & Yue Gu & Haihan Liu & Fan Yang, 2023. "Assessing Rural Production Space Quality and Influencing Factors in Typical Grain-Producing Areas of Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Sébastien Breau & Michael Shin & Nick Burkhart, 2018. "Pulling apart: new perspectives on the spatial dimensions of neighbourhood income disparities in Canadian cities," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Huangling Gu & Yan Liu & Hao Xia & Xiao Tan & Yanjia Zeng & Xianchao Zhao, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution and Its Driving Mechanism of Carbon Emissions in Hunan Province in the Last 20 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Uğur Ursavaş & Carlos Mendez, 2023. "Regional income convergence and conditioning factors in Turkey: revisiting the role of spatial dependence and neighbor effects," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(2), pages 363-389, October.
    12. Fiaschi, Davide & Gianmoena, Lisa & Parenti, Angela, 2018. "Spatial club dynamics in European regions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 115-130.
    13. Jun Fu & Rui Ding & Yilin Zhang & Tao Zhou & Yiming Du & Yuqi Zhu & Linyu Du & Lina Peng & Jian Zou & Wenqian Xiao, 2022. "The Spatial-Temporal Transition and Influencing Factors of Green and Low-Carbon Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land in China under the Goal of Carbon Neutralization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Siyou Xia & Yu Yang & Xiaoying Qian & Xin Xu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Interaction and Socioeconomic Determinants of Rural Energy Poverty in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Wenze Yue & Yuntang Zhang & Xinyue Ye & Yeqing Cheng & Mark R. Leipnik, 2014. "Dynamics of Multi-Scale Intra-Provincial Regional Inequality in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Lingyan Li & Jiaxin Zhu & Mimi Duan & Pingbo Li & Xiaotong Guo, 2022. "Overcoming the Collaboration Barriers among Stakeholders in Urban Renewal Based on a Two-Mode Social Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Huijuan Fu & Bo Li & Xiuqing Liu & Jiayi Zheng & Shanggang Yin & Haining Jiang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Coupling Evolution of Urbanisation and Carbon Emission in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Qinghua Pang & Hailiang Huang & Lina Zhang, 2022. "Characteristics of Spatial–Temporal Variations in Coupling Coordination between Industrial Water Use and Industrial Green Development Systems in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Yinglong Hu & Xinxiang Chen & Guoliang Zhao & Xuejun Liu & Jian Yu & Min Li & Yang Liu & Xiaotong Hu & Rui Zhong & Yingbiao Chen, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Responses to Land Use Change in Southern Guangzhou—The Practice of Applying Natural Resources Integrated Database for Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    20. Giorgio Fazio & Luciano Lavecchia, 2013. "Social Capital Formation across Space," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 36(3), pages 296-321, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:813-:d:607068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.