IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251375497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Pollution Regulation and Rural Residents’ Subjective Well-Being: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiwen Ji
  • Yi Yu
  • Xianchun Dan
  • Dan Pan
  • Hui Mao

Abstract

Severe land pollution poses a great detriment to the environment and human welfare, which is a main challenge to the achievement of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. However, it lacks evidence to demonstrate whether land pollution regulation can increase people’s subjective well-being (SWB) and what its underlying mechanisms are. This paper delves into the influence of land pollution regulation on rural residents’ SWB based on a nationwide 3,560 individual samples from China. Our results show that land pollution regulation can significantly increase rural residents’ SWB. This effect remains robust after dealing with the potential selection bias and endogeneity problems. Besides, the monetary value of land pollution regulation grounded on the life satisfaction approach shows that the resulting improvement in rural residents’ SWB brought by land pollution regulation is equivalent to 5.3 times of the effect of household income. Moreover, we detect that the positive impact of land pollution regulation on SWB is more noticeable for rural residents with lower education and household income, and those who are junior and old-aged. Further mechanism analysis highlights that agricultural income improvement and health promotion are two crucial mechanisms. Our results highlight the importance of implementing land pollution regulations to facilitate individuals’ SWB.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaiwen Ji & Yi Yu & Xianchun Dan & Dan Pan & Hui Mao, 2025. "Land Pollution Regulation and Rural Residents’ Subjective Well-Being: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251375497
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251375497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251375497
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251375497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251375497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.