IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2589-d1053260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualization and Validation of the Occupation Insecurity Scale (OCIS): Measuring Employees’ Occupation Insecurity Due to Automation

Author

Listed:
  • Lara C. Roll

    (Research Group Work, Organisational & Personnel Psychology (WOPP–O2L), KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Optentia Research Unit, Vaal Triangle Campus, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa)

  • Hans De Witte

    (Research Group Work, Organisational & Personnel Psychology (WOPP–O2L), KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Optentia Research Unit, Vaal Triangle Campus, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa)

  • Hai-Jiang Wang

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Increased use and implementation of automation, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, gives rise to a new phenomenon: occupation insecurity. In this paper, we conceptualize and define occupation insecurity, as well as develop an Occupation Insecurity Scale (OCIS) to measure it. From focus groups, subject-matter expert interviews, and a quantitative pilot study, two dimensions emerged: global occupation insecurity, which refers to employees’ fear that their occupations might disappear, and content occupation insecurity, which addresses employees’ concern that (the tasks of) their occupations might significantly change due to automation. In a survey-study sampling 1373 UK employees, psychometric properties of OCIS were examined in terms of reliability, construct validity, measurement invariance (across gender, age, and occupational position), convergent and divergent validity (with job and career insecurity), external discriminant validity (with organizational future time perspective), external validity (by comparing theoretically secure vs. insecure groups), and external and incremental validity (by examining burnout and work engagement as potential outcomes of occupation insecurity). Overall, OCIS shows good results in terms of reliability and validity. Therefore, OCIS offers an avenue to measure and address occupation insecurity before it can impact employee wellbeing and organizational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lara C. Roll & Hans De Witte & Hai-Jiang Wang, 2023. "Conceptualization and Validation of the Occupation Insecurity Scale (OCIS): Measuring Employees’ Occupation Insecurity Due to Automation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2589-:d:1053260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burgard, Sarah A. & Brand, Jennie E. & House, James S., 2009. "Perceived job insecurity and worker health in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 777-785, September.
    2. Marjorie Armstrong-Stassen, 2001. "Reactions of Older Employees to Organizational Downsizing," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 56(4), pages 234-243.
    3. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    4. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2018. "Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 239-257, March.
    5. Nele De Cuyper & Anahí Van Hootegem & Kelly Smet & Ellen Houben & Hans De Witte, 2019. "All Insecure, All Good? Job Insecurity Profiles in Relation to Career Correlates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Thor Berger & Carl Benedikt Frey, 2016. "Structural Transformation in the OECD: Digitalisation, Deindustrialisation and the Future of Work," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 193, OECD Publishing.
    7. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    8. repec:hal:gemptp:hal-01249895 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Edward W. Miles, 2019. "The Purpose of the Business School," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-15781-4, September.
    10. Martin Sanchez-Gomez & Edgar Breso, 2020. "In Pursuit of Work Performance: Testing the Contribution of Emotional Intelligence and Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Bolli & Filippo Pusterla, 2022. "Decomposing the effects of digitalization on workers’ job satisfaction," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 263-300, June.
    2. Guanglu Xu & Ming Xue & Jidi Zhao, 2023. "The Association between Artificial Intelligence Awareness and Employee Depression: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2020. "Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Lingmont, Derek N.J. & Alexiou, Andreas, 2020. "The contingent effect of job automating technology awareness on perceived job insecurity: Exploring the moderating role of organizational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Foster-McGregor, Neil & Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2021. "Job Automation Risk, Economic Structure and Trade: a European Perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    6. Samuel Ogbeibu & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & James Gaskin & Abdelhak Senadjki & Mathew Hughes, 2021. "Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organisational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2421-2440, July.
    7. Nickel, Christiane & Bobeica, Elena & Koester, Gerrit & Lis, Eliza & Porqueddu, Mario, 2019. "Understanding low wage growth in the euro area and European countries," Occasional Paper Series 232, European Central Bank.
    8. Patel, Pankaj C. & Devaraj, Srikant & Hicks, Michael J. & Wornell, Emily J., 2018. "County-level job automation risk and health: Evidence from the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 54-60.
    9. Hyun Jung Lee & Tahira M. Probst & Andrea Bazzoli & Sunhee Lee, 2022. "Technology Advancements and Employees’ Qualitative Job Insecurity in the Republic of Korea: Does Training Help? Employer-Provided vs. Self-Paid Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Makarius, Erin E. & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Fox, Joseph D. & Fox, Alexa K., 2020. "Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 262-273.
    11. Reetta Oksa & Tiina Saari & Markus Kaakinen & Atte Oksanen, 2021. "The Motivations for and Well-Being Implications of Social Media Use at Work among Millennials and Members of Former Generations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    12. David, Sofia & Zinica, Daniel & Bărbuță-Mișu, Nicoleta & Savga, Larisa & Virlanuta, Florina-Oana, 2024. "Public administration managers' and employees' perceptions of adaptability to change under “the future of work” paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Budhwar, Pawan & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Joel-Edgar, Sian & Abadie, Amelie, 2022. "AI-employee collaboration and business performance: Integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 31-49.
    14. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Marcolin, Arianna & Scicchitano, Sergio, 2021. "The reassuring effect of firms' technological innovations on workers' job insecurity," GLO Discussion Paper Series 938, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    15. Guanglu Xu & Ming Xue & Jidi Zhao, 2023. "The Relationship of Artificial Intelligence Opportunity Perception and Employee Workplace Well-Being: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Mahyar Kamali Saraji & Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2021. "Fermatean Fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS Method for Evaluating the Challenges to Industry 4.0 Adoption for a Sustainable Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Lisa Katharina Kortmann & Julia Simonson & Claudia Vogel & Oliver Huxhold, 2022. "Digitalisation and Employees’ Subjective Job Quality in the Second Half of Working Life in Germany," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 577-597, July.
    18. Kang, David Yeonjun & Hur, Won-Moo & Shin, Yuhyung, 2023. "Smart technology and service employees’ job crafting: Relationship between STARA awareness, performance pressure, receiving and giving help, and job crafting," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Aepli, Manuel, 2019. "Technological change and occupation mobility: A task-based approach to horizontal mismatch," GLO Discussion Paper Series 361, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Pasini & Margherita Brondino, 2023. "A Person-Centered Approach to Job Insecurity: Is There a Reciprocal Relationship between the Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Job Insecurity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-27, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2589-:d:1053260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.