IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1336-d1032352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Impact Mechanism of High-Quality Development in China’s Coastal Provinces

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojie Wang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, No. 1 Daxue Road, University Science Park, Changqing District, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Rongqing Han

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, No. 1 Daxue Road, University Science Park, Changqing District, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Minghua Zhao

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, No. 1 Daxue Road, University Science Park, Changqing District, Jinan 250358, China)

Abstract

With economic expansion having moderated to a “new normal” pace, the eastern coastal provinces have been given a new historical task of high-quality development and become a window and frontier of China’s high-quality development. By designing and optimizing an index system of high-quality development levels and using the entropy-TOPSIS method, the study selected 21 indicators, include economic vitality, residents’ living standards, innovation efficiency and green development, and took China’s eastern coastal provinces as an example to study the characteristics of spatial-temporal variations in the high-quality development level from 2010 to 2020. Then, the study used the obstacle degree model to explore the factors that are obstacles to high-quality development. The results show that the high-quality development of the eastern coastal provinces presents an “up-down-up” fluctuation, with an increase of 40.1%. In particular, the development level of the residents’ living standards dimension is higher, and the high-quality development level of each province shows different degrees of growth and gradually tends to balanced development, with the high-quality development of Shanghai, Jiangsu Province and Zhejiang Province in a dominant position. The spatial pattern of high-quality development in the study areas shows a spatial distribution pattern of “high in the east and low in the west, high in the north and low in the south”, in which the bipolar spatial effect of the innovation efficiency dimension is becoming more and more prominent, while the regional synergistic development effect of the residents’ living standard dimension is more obvious, and the high-quality development spatial pattern shows a “core-periphery” structure, and there is a path-dependent effect in time change, and agglomeration is produced by trickle-down effect in space. The obstacles to residents’ living standards are high, and the main obstacle factor has gradually changed from insufficient output in innovation to a reduction in the scale of foreign trade. In addition, the problems of unreasonable industrial structure and shortage of per capita public cultural resources still exist. In provinces with a high-quality development level and a relatively developed economy, the biggest obstacle factors are economic vitality and residents’ living standards. In provinces with a low level of high-quality development and a relatively backward economy, the biggest obstacle factors are green development and innovation efficiency, and there are both similarities and differences in the main obstacle factors among provinces.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han & Minghua Zhao, 2023. "Evaluation and Impact Mechanism of High-Quality Development in China’s Coastal Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1336-:d:1032352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhifu Mi & Jiali Zheng & Jing Meng & Jiamin Ou & Klaus Hubacek & Zhu Liu & D’Maris Coffman & Nicholas Stern & Sai Liang & Yi-Ming Wei, 2020. "Economic development and converging household carbon footprints in China," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 529-537, July.
    2. Shaolong Zeng & Yiqun Liu & Junjie Ding & Danlu Xu, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis of Energy Consumption, FDI and High Quality Development Based on Time Series Data of Zhejiang Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent‐Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2011. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 803-842, September.
    4. Minjuan Lv & Zhiting Chen & Lingling Yao & Xiaohu Dang & Peng Li & Xiaoshu Cao, 2022. "Potential Zoning of Construction Land Consolidation in the Loess Plateau Based on the Evolution of Human–Land Relationship," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Wentao Gu & Jiaye Wang & Xiyuan Hua & Zhongdi Liu, 2021. "Entrepreneurship and high-quality economic development: based on the triple bottom line of sustainable development," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Subhasis Das & Biswajeet Pradhan & Pravat Kumar Shit & Abdullah M. Alamri, 2020. "Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Health Using the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) Model: A Case Study of Mursidabad District of West Bengal (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Claude Diebolt & Ralph Hippe, 2022. "Human Capital and Regional Development in Europe," Frontiers in Economic History, Springer, number 978-3-030-90858-4, Fall.
    8. Song, Malin & Du, Juntao & Tan, Kim Hua, 2018. "Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 359-367.
    9. M.M. Ihnatenko & L.O. Marmul & D.S. Ushakov & S.P. Kuchyn, 2019. "Transformation of Approaches to Determine Influence Factors in the Economic Development Models," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 290-301.
    10. Niebel, Thomas, 2018. "ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-211.
    11. Gaies, Brahim & Nakhli, Mohamed Sahbi & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2022. "What are the effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions in MENA countries?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Lu Shen & Guohua He & Miaochao Chen, 2022. "Threshold Effect of Financial System on High-Quality Economic Development," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-14, January.
    13. Rong Wang & Fayuan Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Green Finance and Energy Development towards High-Quality Economic Development: Application of Spatial Durbin Model and Intermediary Effect Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Yufan Sun & Zhuo Jia & Qi Chen & Heya Na, 2022. "Spatial Pattern and Spillover Effects of the Urban Land Green Use Efficiency for the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Bo-Rui Yan & Qian-Li Dong & Qian Li & Fahim UI Amin & Jia-Ni Wu, 2021. "A Study on the Coupling and Coordination between Logistics Industry and Economy in the Background of High-Quality Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Peneder, Michael, 2003. "Industrial structure and aggregate growth," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 427-448, December.
    17. Ghosh, Amit, 2017. "How does banking sector globalization affect economic growth?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 83-97.
    18. Shaobo Wang & Junfeng Liu & Xionghe Qin, 2022. "Financing Constraints, Carbon Emissions and High-Quality Urban Development—Empirical Evidence from 290 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Zhang, Jun & Fu, Xiaoming & Morris, Harry, 2019. "Construction of indicator system of regional economic system impact factors based on fractional differential equations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 25-33.
    20. Carlos Scheel & Eduardo Aguiñaga & Bernardo Bello, 2020. "Decoupling Economic Development from the Consumption of Finite Resources Using Circular Economy. A Model for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    21. Demir, Firat & Duan, Yi, 2018. "Bilateral FDI Flows, Productivity Growth, and Convergence: The North vs. The South," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 235-249.
    22. Frank Wogbe Agbola, 2014. "Modelling the impact of foreign direct investment and human capital on economic growth: empirical evidence from the Philippines," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 272-289, April.
    23. Hamamoto, Mitsutsugu, 2006. "Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 299-312, November.
    24. Pasquale Marcello Falcone, 2020. "Environmental regulation and green investments: the role of green finance," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 159-173.
    25. Huang, Wencheng & Shuai, Bin & Sun, Yan & Wang, Yang & Antwi, Eric, 2018. "Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 292-303.
    26. Claude Diebolt & Ralph Hippe, 2022. "The Long-Run Impact of Human Capital on Innovation and Economic Growth in the Regions of Europe," Frontiers in Economic History, in: Human Capital and Regional Development in Europe, chapter 0, pages 85-115, Springer.
    27. Ahmed M. Khalid & Antonio Marasco, 2019. "Do channels of financial integration matter for FDI’s impact on growth? Empirical evidence using a panel," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(37), pages 4025-4045, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangyan Meng & Mingyuan Tang & Fanchao Kong & Shuai Li, 2022. "The Effect of Environmental Information Disclosure on Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiments on Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yu Zhang & Jie Wang & Jiakai Chen & Weizhong Liu, 2023. "Does environmental regulation policy help improve business performance of manufacturing enterprises? evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4335-4364, May.
    3. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Zhou, Yicheng, 2021. "How does vertical fiscal imbalance affect the upgrading of industrial structure? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    6. Zhuoxi Yu & Yu Wu & Zhichuan Zhu, 2023. "Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Chiara Franco & Giovanni Marin, 2013. "The Effect of Within-Sector, Upstream and Downstream Energy Taxes on Innovation and Productivity," SEEDS Working Papers 0214, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jan 2014.
    8. Yang, Chih-Hai & Tseng, Yu-Hsuan & Chen, Chiang-Ping, 2012. "Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 514-532.
    9. Hongshan Ai & Shenglan Hu & Ke Li & Shuai Shao, 2020. "Environmental regulation, total factor productivity, and enterprise duration: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2284-2296, September.
    10. Bakari, Sayef, 2022. "The Impact of Digitalization and Patent on Economic Growth in Romania," MPRA Paper 114259, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Wei Zhang & Siqi Zhao & Xiaoyu Wan & Yuan Yao, 2021. "Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.
    12. Wang, Yan & Shen, Neng, 2016. "Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 758-766.
    13. Bu, Maoliang & Qiao, Zhenzi & Liu, Beibei, 2020. "Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 10-18.
    14. Jianing Xu & Weidong Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Innovation: New Evidence from Panel Threshold Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    16. Khan, Zeeshan & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Badeeb, Ramez Abubakr & Zhang, Changyong, 2023. "Aggregate and disaggregate impact of natural resources on economic performance: Role of green growth and human capital," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Xueping Wu & Ming Gao & Shihong Guo & Wei Li, 2019. "Effects of environmental regulation on air pollution control in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 307-333, June.
    18. Böhringer, Christoph & Moslener, Ulf & Oberndorfer, Ulrich & Ziegler, Andreas, 2012. "Clean and productive? Empirical evidence from the German manufacturing industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 442-451.
    19. Lorena D’Agostino, 2015. "How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 32(2), pages 245-269, August.
    20. Sen, Suphi, 2015. "Corporate governance, environmental regulations, and technological change," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 36-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1336-:d:1032352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.