IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3815-d530792.html

Healthy Food on the Twitter Social Network: Vegan, Homemade, and Organic Food

Author

Listed:
  • Ladislav Pilař

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Roman Kvasnička

    (Department of Systems Engineering, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Online social networks have become an everyday aspect of many people’s lives. Users spend more and more time on these platforms and, through their interactions on social media platforms, they create active and passive digital footprints. These data have a strong potential in many research areas; indeed, understanding people’s communication on social media is essential for understanding their attitudes, experiences, behaviors and values. Researchers have found that the use of social networking sites impacts eating behavior; thus, analyzing social network data is important for understanding the meaning behind expressions used in the context of healthy food. This study performed a communication analysis of data from the social network Twitter, which included 666,178 messages posted by 168,134 individual users. These data comprised all tweets that used the #healthyfood hashtag between 2019 and 2020 on Twitter. The results revealed that users most commonly associate healthy food with a healthy lifestyle, diet, and fitness. Foods associated with this hashtag were vegan, homemade, and organic. Given that people change their behavior according to other people’s behavior on social networks, these data could be used to identify current and future associations with current and future perceptions of healthy food characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Ladislav Pilař & Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & Roman Kvasnička, 2021. "Healthy Food on the Twitter Social Network: Vegan, Homemade, and Organic Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3815-:d:530792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3815/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3815/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ladislav Pilař & Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & Jana Pitrová & Igor Krejčí & Ivana Tichá & Martina Chalupová, 2019. "Twitter Analysis of Global Communication in the Field of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & Ladislav Pilař & Klára Margarisová & Roman Kvasnička, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media: Comparison between Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Choudhary, Sonal & Nayak, Rakesh & Kumari, Sushma & Choudhury, Homagni, 2019. "Analysing acculturation to sustainable food consumption behaviour in the social media through the lens of information diffusion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 481-492.
    4. Karl Peltzer & Supa Pengpid & T. Alafia Samuels & Neslihan Keser Özcan & Carolina Mantilla & Onja H. Rahamefy & Mee Lian Wong & Alexander Gasparishvili, 2014. "Prevalence of Overweight/Obesity and Its Associated Factors among University Students from 22 Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Karami, Amir & Dahl, Alicia A. & Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle & Kharrazi, Hadi & Shaw, George, 2018. "Characterizing diabetes, diet, exercise, and obesity comments on Twitter," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-6.
    6. Steils, Nadia & Obaidalahe, Zakia, 2020. "“Social food”: Food literacy co-construction and distortion on social media," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Diogo Gonçalves & Pedro Coelho & Luis F. Martinez & Paulo Monteiro, 2021. "Nudging Consumers toward Healthier Food Choices: A Field Study on the Effect of Social Norms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Jiren, Tolera Senbeto & Bergsten, Arvid & Dorresteijn, Ine & Collier, Neil French & Leventon, Julia & Fischer, Joern, 2018. "Integrating food security and biodiversity governance: A multi-level social network analysis in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 420-429.
    9. Pilar, Ladislav & Balcarova, Tereza & Rojik, Stanislav & Ticha, Ivana & Polakova, Jana, 2018. "Customer experience with farmers’ markets: what hashtags can reveal," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    10. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2015. "Insights from hashtag #supplychain and Twitter Analytics: Considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 247-259.
    11. Hansen, Torben & Sørensen, Maria Ingerslev & Eriksen, Marie-Louise Riewerts, 2018. "How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 39-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yutong Si & Alaina Kinol & Hongtao Yi & Diana Hernández, 2025. "Space for Justice in Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) Discourse: Examining Hashtag Co‐Occurrence Networks and Energy Justice Messaging on Social Media," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3941-3957, June.
    2. Cong Cao & Dan Li & Qianwen Xu & Xiuyan Shao, 2022. "Motivational Influences Affecting Middle-Aged and Elderly Users’ Participation Intention in Health-Related Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theo Lynn & Pierangelo Rosati & Guto Leoni Santos & Patricia Takako Endo, 2020. "Sorting the Healthy Diet Signal from the Social Media Expert Noise: Preliminary Evidence from the Healthy Diet Discourse on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Chih-Cheng Chen & Faradilah Hanum & Tat-Dat Bui & Ming K. Lim & Ming-Lang Tseng, 2025. "Suboptimal food products in Indonesia: a sustainable consumption behavior choice experiment and unveiling the attributes with a causality approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(1), pages 1175-1221, December.
    3. Ray Qing Cao & Dara G. Schniederjans & Vicky Ching Gu, 2021. "Stakeholder sentiment in service supply chains: big data meets agenda-setting theory," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(1), pages 151-175, March.
    4. Egor V. Dudukalov & Galymzhan O. Spabekov & Liudmila V. Kashirskaya & Andrei V. Sevbitov & Olga Yurievna Voronkova & Lidia Vasyutkina, 2020. "Fiscal goals of regulating the activities of the institute of controlled foreign companies in the digital economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 972-983, December.
    5. Malkanthi, SHP, 2020. "Urban consumers’ attitude towards organic food in Sri Lanka," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 14(01-2), June.
    6. Oliva M. D. Martins & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Ana Sofia Coelho & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2022. "Sensory Perception Nudge: Insect-Based Food Consumer Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Sharan Srinivas & Surya Ramachandiran, 2024. "Passenger intelligence as a competitive opportunity: unsupervised text analytics for discovering airline-specific insights from online reviews," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(2), pages 1045-1075, February.
    8. Alekh Gour & Shikha Aggarwal & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Lending ears to unheard voices: An empirical analysis of user‐generated content on social media," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2457-2476, June.
    9. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2020. "e-Tracking COVID-19 Disruptions to the Global Development Agenda on Land," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 1-9, September.
    10. Peter Konhäusner & Marius Thielmann & Veronica Câmpian & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2021. "Crowdfunding for Independent Print Media: E-Commerce, Marketing, and Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Jyoti Prakash Singh & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Abhinav Kumar & Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor, 2019. "Event classification and location prediction from tweets during disasters," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 737-757, December.
    12. Kozjek, Dominik & Vrabič, Rok & Eržen, Gregor & Butala, Peter, 2018. "Identifying the business and social networks in the domain of production by merging the data from heterogeneous internet sources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 181-191.
    13. Corentin Juin & Valentine Georget & Thierry Rayna, 2025. "Business Model Innovation: a Framework for Assessing Corporate Engagement with Sustainability," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(7), pages 6411-6433, December.
    14. Martin Quinn & Theodore Lynn & Stephen Jollands & Binesh Nair, 2016. "Domestic Water Charges in Ireland - Issues and Challenges Conveyed through Social Media," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3577-3591, August.
    15. Savita Prasad Kunwer & Shalini Singh, 2025. "Churning the Mindful Consumption Research for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: A Review Analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 4810-4834, August.
    16. Chen, Xi & Wong, Tse Chiu, 2021. "Application of social media data in supply chain management : A systematic review," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 499-523, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    17. Holly Blake & Kathryn Watkins & Matthew Middleton & Natalia Stanulewicz, 2021. "Obesity and Diet Predict Attitudes towards Health Promotion in Pre-Registered Nurses and Midwives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Santosh Kumar Srivastava & Surajit Bag, 2023. "Recent Developments on Flexible Manufacturing in the Digital Era: A Review and Future Research Directions," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(4), pages 483-516, December.
    19. Purva Grover & Arpan Kumar Kar, 2017. "Big Data Analytics: A Review on Theoretical Contributions and Tools Used in Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(3), pages 203-229, September.
    20. Greta Castellini & Mariarosaria Savarese & Cinzia Castiglioni & Guendalina Graffigna, 2020. "Organic Food Consumption in Italy: The Role of Subjective Relevance of Food as Mediator between Organic Food Choice Motivation and Frequency of Organic Food Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3815-:d:530792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.