IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10370-d648546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cutting Oxygen Production-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Improved Compression Heat Management in a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Miroslav Variny

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Dominika Jediná

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Miroslav Rimár

    (Department of Process Technique, Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies with a Seat in Presov, Technical University of Kosice, Bayerova 1, 080 01 Presov, Slovakia)

  • Ján Kizek

    (Department of Process Technique, Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies with a Seat in Presov, Technical University of Kosice, Bayerova 1, 080 01 Presov, Slovakia)

  • Marianna Kšiňanová

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

Oxygen production in cryogenic air separation units is related to a significant carbon footprint and its supply in the medicinal sphere became critical during the recent COVID-19 crisis. An improved unit design was proposed, utilizing a part of waste heat produced during air pre-cooling and intercooling via absorption coolers, to reduce power consumption. Variable ambient air humidity impact on compressed air dryers’ regeneration was also considered. A steady-state process simulation of a model 500 t h −1 inlet cryogenic air separation unit was performed in Aspen Plus ® V11. Comparison of a model without and with absorption coolers yielded an achievable reduction in power consumption for air compression and air dryer regeneration by 6 to 9% (23 to 33 GWh year −1 ) and a favorable simple payback period of 4 to 10 years, both depending on air pressure loss in additional heat exchangers to be installed. The resulting specific oxygen production decrease amounted to EUR 2–4.2 t −1 . Emissions of major gaseous pollutants from power production were both calculated by an in-house developed thermal power plant model and adopted from literature. A power consumption cut was translated into the following annual greenhouse gas emission reduction: CO 2 16 to 30 kilotons, CO 0.3 to 2.3 tons, SO x 4.7 to 187 tons and NO x 11 to 56 tons, depending on applied fossil fuel-based emission factors. Considering a more renewable energy sources-containing energy mix, annual greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 50 to over 80%, varying for individual pollutants.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Miroslav Rimár & Ján Kizek & Marianna Kšiňanová, 2021. "Cutting Oxygen Production-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Improved Compression Heat Management in a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10370-:d:648546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adahl, Anders & Harvey, Simon & Berntsson, Thore, 2004. "Process industry energy retrofits: the importance of emission baselines for greenhouse gas reductions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1375-1388, August.
    2. Sam Hamels, 2021. "CO 2 Intensities and Primary Energy Factors in the Future European Electricity System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Chen, Li & Wemhoff, Aaron P., 2021. "Predicting embodied carbon emissions from purchased electricity for United States counties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. DeVynne Farquharson & Paulina Jaramillo & Greg Schivley & Kelly Klima & Derrick Carlson & Constantine Samaras, 2017. "Beyond Global Warming Potential: A Comparative Application of Climate Impact Metrics for the Life Cycle Assessment of Coal and Natural Gas Based Electricity," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(4), pages 857-873, August.
    5. Nils Seckinger & Peter Radgen, 2021. "Dynamic Prospective Average and Marginal GHG Emission Factors—Scenario-Based Method for the German Power System until 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Martin Lieskovský & Marek Trenčiansky & Andrea Majlingová & Július Jankovský, 2019. "Energy Resources, Load Coverage of the Electricity System and Environmental Consequences of the Energy Sources Operation in the Slovak Republic—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    8. María Carmen Carnero & Andrés Gómez, 2019. "Optimization of Decision Making in the Supply of Medicinal Gases Used in Health Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, May.
    9. Adamson, Richard & Hobbs, Martin & Silcock, Andy & Willis, Mark J., 2017. "Steady-state optimisation of a multiple cryogenic air separation unit and compressor plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 221-232.
    10. Kenneth Leerbeck & Peder Bacher & Rune Grønborg Junker & Anna Tveit & Olivier Corradi & Henrik Madsen & Razgar Ebrahimy, 2020. "Control of Heat Pumps with CO 2 Emission Intensity Forecasts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Tafone, Alessio & Dal Magro, Fabio & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2018. "Integrating an oxygen enriched waste to energy plant with cryogenic engines and Air Separation Unit: Technical, economic and environmental analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 423-432.
    12. Daniel-Eduard Constantin & Corina Bocăneala & Mirela Voiculescu & Adrian Roşu & Alexis Merlaud & Michel Van Roozendael & Puiu Lucian Georgescu, 2020. "Evolution of SO 2 and NOx Emissions from Several Large Combustion Plants in Europe during 2005–2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Strachan, Neil & Farrell, Alexander, 2006. "Emissions from distributed vs. centralized generation: The importance of system performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 2677-2689, November.
    14. Castillo, Renzo, 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of a hard coal oxyfuel power plant with high temperature three-end membrane for air separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1480-1493, May.
    15. Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna & Składzień, Jan, 2017. "Analysis of supercritical coal fired oxy combustion power plant with cryogenic oxygen unit and turbo-compressor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 271-283.
    16. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Wang, Chen & Akkurt, Nevzat & Zhang, Xiaosong & Luo, Yimo & She, Xiaohui, 2020. "Techno-economic analyses of multi-functional liquid air energy storage for power generation, oxygen production and heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    18. Hamels, Sam & Himpe, Eline & Laverge, Jelle & Delghust, Marc & Van den Brande, Kjartan & Janssens, Arnold & Albrecht, Johan, 2021. "The use of primary energy factors and CO2 intensities for electricity in the European context - A systematic methodological review and critical evaluation of the contemporary literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2020. "Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Espatolero, Sergio & Cortés, Cristóbal & Romeo, Luis M., 2010. "Optimization of boiler cold-end and integration with the steam cycle in supercritical units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1651-1660, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miroslav Variny & Kristián Hanus & Marek Blahušiak & Patrik Furda & Peter Illés & Ján Janošovský, 2021. "Energy and Environmental Assessment of Steam Management Optimization in an Ethylene Plant," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Sandra Kiessling & Hamidreza Gohari Darabkhani & Abdel-Hamid Soliman, 2022. "The Bio Steel Cycle: 7 Steps to Net-Zero CO 2 Emissions Steel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Slavomír Podolský & Miroslav Variny & Tomáš Kurák, 2023. "Carbon-Energy Impact Analysis of Heavy Residue Gasification Plant Integration into Oil Refinery," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Patrik Furda, 2021. "Comment on Hamayun et al. Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis. Energies 2020, 13 , 6361," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-8, October.
    2. Miroslav Variny & Kristián Hanus & Marek Blahušiak & Patrik Furda & Peter Illés & Ján Janošovský, 2021. "Energy and Environmental Assessment of Steam Management Optimization in an Ethylene Plant," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Miroslav Variny, 2022. "Comment on Rogalev et al. Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia. Energies 2021, 14 , 7136," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-5, February.
    5. Constantinos A. Balaras & Elena G. Dascalaki & Ioanna Psarra & Tomasz Cholewa, 2022. "Primary Energy Factors for Electricity Production in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Zhang, Tongtong & She, Xiaohui & You, Zhanping & Zhao, Yanqi & Fan, Hongjun & Ding, Yulong, 2022. "Cryogenic thermoelectric generation using cold energy from a decoupled liquid air energy storage system for decentralised energy networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    7. Maciej Dzikuć & Joanna Wyrobek & Łukasz Popławski, 2021. "Economic Determinants of Low-Carbon Development in the Visegrad Group Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Nicole K. Bond & Robert T. Symonds & Robin W. Hughes, 2024. "Pressurized Chemical Looping for Direct Reduced Iron Production: Economics of Carbon Neutral Process Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Che, Gelegen & Zhang, Yanyan & Tang, Lixin & Zhao, Shengnan, 2023. "A deep reinforcement learning based multi-objective optimization for the scheduling of oxygen production system in integrated iron and steel plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Peter Mako & Andrej Dávid & Patrik Böhm & Sorin Savu, 2021. "Sustainable Transport in the Danube Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. López-González, A. & Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L., 2018. "Formative evaluation of sustainability in rural electrification programs from a management perspective: A case study from Venezuela," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 95-109.
    13. Ding, Xingqi & Zhou, Yufei & Duan, Liqiang & Li, Da & Zheng, Nan, 2023. "Comprehensive performance investigation of a novel solar-assisted liquid air energy storage system with different operating modes in different seasons," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    14. Yoon, Kwangsuk & Lee, Sang Soo & Ok, Yong Sik & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Song, Hocheol, 2019. "Enhancement of syngas for H2 production via catalytic pyrolysis of orange peel using CO2 and bauxite residue," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    15. Michael L. Carty & Stephane Bilodeau, 2023. "Benchmarking Thermodynamic Models for Optimization of PSA Oxygen Generators," J, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, June.
    16. Dzido, Aleksandra & Krawczyk, Piotr & Wołowicz, Marcin & Badyda, Krzysztof, 2022. "Comparison of advanced air liquefaction systems in Liquid Air Energy Storage applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-739.
    17. Ma, Youfu & Wang, Zirui & Lu, Junfu & Yang, Lijuan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a novel hot air recirculation process for exhaust heat recovery from a 600 MW brown-coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 348-357.
    18. Serrano, José Ramón & Arnau, Francisco José & García-Cuevas, Luis Miguel & Gutiérrez, Fabio Alberto, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of an oxygen production plant powered by an innovative energy recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Meng Yue & Guoqian Ma & Yuetao Shi, 2020. "Analysis of Gas Recirculation Influencing Factors of a Double Reheat 1000 MW Unit with the Reheat Steam Temperature under Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Alsanousie, Abdurrahman A. & Elsamni, Osama A. & Attia, Abdelhamid E. & Elhelw, Mohamed, 2021. "Transient and troubleshoots management of aged small-scale steam power plants using Aspen Plus Dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10370-:d:648546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.