IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i23p6361-d454859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Haris Hamayun

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan
    Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Defence Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Naveed Ramzan

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Murid Hussain

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Defence Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Faheem

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

Abstract

Cryogenic air separation processes are widely used for the large-scale production of nitrogen and oxygen. The most widely used design for this process involves two distillation columns operating at different pressures. This work focuses on the selection of suitable cryogenic air separation process by evaluating seven alternative designs of the two-column air separation process based on detailed exergy analysis. The feed conditions (500 tons/h, and 50% relative humidity of air), product purities (99 mole% for both nitrogen and oxygen), and operational conditions (pressures of both distillation columns) are kept same in all designs. The two cryogenic distillation columns in each configuration are heat-integrated to eliminate the need for external utilities. Steady-state simulation results are used to calculate the exergy efficiency (%) of each equipment as well as its contribution toward the overall exergy destruction rate (kW) of the process. The results show that the compression section is a major source of exergy destruction, followed by the low-pressure column, and the multi-stream heat exchanger. A Petlyuk-like configuration, labeled as C1, provides the lowest exergy destruction rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2020. "Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6361-:d:454859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tesch, Stefanie & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Exergetic and economic evaluation of safety-related concepts for the regasification of LNG integrated into air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2458-2469.
    2. Kaushik, S.C. & Reddy, V. Siva & Tyagi, S.K., 2011. "Energy and exergy analyses of thermal power plants: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1857-1872, May.
    3. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Rizk, J. & Nemer, M. & Clodic, D., 2012. "A real column design exergy optimization of a cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 417-429.
    5. Chen, Shiqing & Dong, Xuezhi & Xu, Jian & Zhang, Hualiang & Gao, Qing & Tan, Chunqing, 2019. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the novel distillation column of the air separation unit with integration of liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 341-359.
    6. Ebrahimi, Armin & Meratizaman, Mousa & Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1298-1316.
    7. van der Ham, L.V. & Kjelstrup, S., 2010. "Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4731-4739.
    8. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farea Asif & Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Murid Hussain & Arif Hussain & Ibrahim M. Maafa & Young-Kwon Park, 2021. "Performance Analysis of the Perhydro-Dibenzyl-Toluene Dehydrogenation System—A Simulation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Moreno, Jovita & Iribarren, Diego, 2022. "Techno-economic comparison of optimized natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Miroslav Rimár & Ján Kizek & Marianna Kšiňanová, 2021. "Cutting Oxygen Production-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Improved Compression Heat Management in a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-32, October.
    4. Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2021. "Reply to Variny et al. Comment on “Hamayun et al. Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis. Energies 2020, 13 , 6361”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-5, October.
    5. Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Patrik Furda, 2021. "Comment on Hamayun et al. Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis. Energies 2020, 13 , 6361," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-8, October.
    6. Michael L. Carty & Stephane Bilodeau, 2023. "Benchmarking Thermodynamic Models for Optimization of PSA Oxygen Generators," J, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahimi, Armin & Ziabasharhagh, Masoud, 2017. "Optimal design and integration of a cryogenic Air Separation Unit (ASU) with Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as heat sink, thermodynamic and economic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 868-885.
    2. Piadehrouhi, Forough & Ghorbani, Bahram & Miansari, Mehdi & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Development of a new integrated structure for simultaneous generation of power and liquid carbon dioxide using solar dish collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 938-959.
    3. Zonouz, Masood Jalali & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2017. "Parametric study of a hybrid one column air separation unit (ASU) and CO2 power cycle based on advanced exergy cost analysis results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 261-275.
    4. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Optimum design and exergy analysis of a novel cryogenic air separation process with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2047-2069.
    5. Andrey Rogalev & Nikolay Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Olga Zlyvko & Andrey Vegera, 2021. "A Study of Low-Potential Heat Utilization Methods for Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Chen, Shiqing & Dong, Xuezhi & Xu, Jian & Zhang, Hualiang & Gao, Qing & Tan, Chunqing, 2019. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the novel distillation column of the air separation unit with integration of liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 341-359.
    7. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    8. Hagi, Hayato & Le Moullec, Yann & Nemer, Maroun & Bouallou, Chakib, 2014. "Performance assessment of first generation oxy-coal power plants through an exergy-based process integration methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 272-284.
    9. Samanta A. Weber & Dirk Volta & Jürgen Kuck, 2022. "Comparison of the Energetic Efficiency of Gas Separation Technologies Using the Physical Optimum by the Example of Oxygen Supply Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Ebrahimi, Armin & Meratizaman, Mousa & Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1298-1316.
    11. Wang, Maojian & Liu, Guilian & Hui, Chi Wai, 2016. "Simultaneous optimization and integration of gas turbine and air separation unit in IGCC plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1294-1301.
    12. Singla, Rohit & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2020. "Saving power by modifying a double column air separation plant to produce high and low purity pressurized gaseous oxygen simultaneously," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Fu, Qian & Kansha, Yasuki & Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Yuping & Ishizuka, Masanori & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2016. "A cryogenic air separation process based on self-heat recuperation for oxy-combustion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1114-1121.
    14. Fangyi Li & Zhaoyang Ye & Xilin Xiao & Dawei Ma, 2019. "Environmental Benefits of Stock Evolution of Coal-Fired Power Generators in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Josip Orović & Vedran Mrzljak & Igor Poljak, 2018. "Efficiency and Losses Analysis of Steam Air Heater from Marine Steam Propulsion Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Serrano, José Ramón & Arnau, Francisco José & García-Cuevas, Luis Miguel & Gutiérrez, Fabio Alberto, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of an oxygen production plant powered by an innovative energy recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Sanusi, Yinka S. & Mokheimer, Esmail M.A., 2019. "Thermo-economic optimization of hydrogen production in a membrane-SMR integrated to ITM-oxy-combustion plant using genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 164-176.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6361-:d:454859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.