IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v210y2020ics0360544220315954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saving power by modifying a double column air separation plant to produce high and low purity pressurized gaseous oxygen simultaneously

Author

Listed:
  • Singla, Rohit
  • Chowdhury, Kanchan

Abstract

Large Steel plants require oxygen at purities of 90% and 99.5%. These purities are required in blast furnace for iron-making and in basic oxygen furnace for steel-making respectively. Though air separation plants in steel plant consume very high power, they are generally not designed to produce oxygen with dual purities and blast furnace continues to consume high-purity oxygen that is thermodynamically a big wastage of power. This work proposes modification of a conventional double column configuration to produce oxygen at purities of 99.5% and 90% simultaneously at pressures of 40 bar and 10 bar respectively with different flow rates. Impure liquid oxygen is drawn a few plates above pure liquid oxygen sump at the bottom of the low pressure column. Recovery of oxygen increased from 91.7% to 99.9% and specific power consumption reduced by 16.7%. Flexibility in product mix requires operational adjustments of rotary equipment. With outlet pressure of booster air compressor fixed, two turbines have to be placed in parallel instead of one. The same flexibility is achieved with one turbine if outlet pressure of booster compressors can be suitably varied. It is made feasible by using separate motors for compressor stages that further reduced power consumption by 5.4%.

Suggested Citation

  • Singla, Rohit & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2020. "Saving power by modifying a double column air separation plant to produce high and low purity pressurized gaseous oxygen simultaneously," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:210:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220315954
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220315954
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianwei, Y. & Guolong, S. & Cunjiang, K. & Tianjun, Y., 2003. "Oxygen blast furnace and combined cycle (OBF-CC)—an efficient iron-making and power generation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 825-835.
    2. Kvamsdal, Hanne M. & Jordal, Kristin & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 10-24.
    3. van der Ham, L.V. & Kjelstrup, S., 2010. "Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4731-4739.
    4. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piadehrouhi, Forough & Ghorbani, Bahram & Miansari, Mehdi & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Development of a new integrated structure for simultaneous generation of power and liquid carbon dioxide using solar dish collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 938-959.
    2. Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2020. "Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Madejski, Paweł & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Exergy analysis of a negative CO2 emission gas power plant based on water oxy-combustion of syngas from sewage sludge gasification and CCS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    4. Zonouz, Masood Jalali & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2017. "Parametric study of a hybrid one column air separation unit (ASU) and CO2 power cycle based on advanced exergy cost analysis results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 261-275.
    5. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Optimum design and exergy analysis of a novel cryogenic air separation process with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2047-2069.
    6. Ebrahimi, Armin & Meratizaman, Mousa & Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1298-1316.
    7. Teichgraeber, Holger & Brodrick, Philip G. & Brandt, Adam R., 2017. "Optimal design and operations of a flexible oxyfuel natural gas plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 506-518.
    8. Paweł Ziółkowski & Stanisław Głuch & Piotr Józef Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2022. "Compact High Efficiency and Zero-Emission Gas-Fired Power Plant with Oxy-Combustion and Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-39, April.
    9. Fu, Qian & Kansha, Yasuki & Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Yuping & Ishizuka, Masanori & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2016. "A cryogenic air separation process based on self-heat recuperation for oxy-combustion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1114-1121.
    10. Ebrahimi, Armin & Ziabasharhagh, Masoud, 2017. "Optimal design and integration of a cryogenic Air Separation Unit (ASU) with Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as heat sink, thermodynamic and economic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 868-885.
    11. Gunasekaran, S. & Mancini, N.D. & El-Khaja, R. & Sheu, E.J. & Mitsos, A., 2014. "Solar–thermal hybridization of advanced zero emissions power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 152-165.
    12. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Aspelund, Audun & Gundersen, Truls, 2009. "A liquefied energy chain for transport and utilization of natural gas for power production with CO2 capture and storage - Part 4: Sensitivity analysis of transport pressures and benchmarking with conv," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 815-825, June.
    14. Fu, Chao & Anantharaman, Rahul & Gundersen, Truls, 2015. "Optimal integration of compression heat with regenerative steam Rankine cycles in oxy-combustion coal based power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 612-622.
    15. Jin, Bo & Zhao, Haibo & Zheng, Chuguang & Liang, Zhiwu, 2018. "Control optimization to achieve energy-efficient operation of the air separation unit in oxy-fuel combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 313-321.
    16. Du, Shan-Wen & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lucas, John A., 2010. "Pulverized coal burnout in blast furnace simulated by a drop tube furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 576-581.
    17. Le Moullec, Yann, 2013. "Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-46.
    18. Håkonsen, Silje Fosse & Grande, Carlos A. & Blom, Richard, 2014. "Rotating bed reactor for CLC: Bed characteristics dependencies on internal gas mixing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1952-1957.
    19. Bhavsar, Saurabh & Isenberg, Natalie & More, Amey & Veser, Götz, 2016. "Lanthana-doped ceria as active support for oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 236-247.
    20. Chen, Shiqing & Dong, Xuezhi & Xu, Jian & Zhang, Hualiang & Gao, Qing & Tan, Chunqing, 2019. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the novel distillation column of the air separation unit with integration of liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 341-359.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:210:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220315954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.