IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v32y2007i1p10-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture

Author

Listed:
  • Kvamsdal, Hanne M.
  • Jordal, Kristin
  • Bolland, Olav

Abstract

Nine different concepts for natural gas fired power plants with CO2 capture have been investigated, and a comparison is made based on net plant efficiency and emission of CO2. The cycles are one post-combustion, six oxy-fuel and two pre-combustion capture concepts. A 400MW combined cycle plant is applied as a reference case. A common basis for the comparison of all concepts is defined and employed in heat- and mass-balance simulations of the various concepts. As gas turbine cooling impacts the net plant efficiency at high turbine inlet temperatures, a simplified turbine cooling model has been applied in the simulations. It is found that the concepts, in which novel technology (the hydrogen membrane separation reformer—-MSR-H2, the advanzed zero emission power plant—AZEP, the solid oxide fuel cell combined with a gas turbine—SOFC+GT and the chemical looping combustion—CLC concepts) is employed, exhibit the best performance with respect to both efficiency and in most cases also CO2 capture (capture rates close to 100%). Post-combustion capture and pre-combustion capture with auto-thermal reforming, which are based on more mature technology, show a lower efficiency and a capture rate of typically 90%. The SOFC+GT concept exhibits the best cycle performance and even better than a standard CC plant, however, any realization of a SOFC-GT 400MW plant has a very distant future perspective. In order to conduct a complete assessment of these diverse concepts, other criteria for comparison such as e.g. technology level and costs should also be considered. This is not, however, included in the present work.

Suggested Citation

  • Kvamsdal, Hanne M. & Jordal, Kristin & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 10-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:1:p:10-24
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.02.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054420600048X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2006.02.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Kvamsdal, Hanne M. & Bolland, Olav, 2005. "Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine combined-cycle power plant with precombustion CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 5-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    2. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Negative carbon dioxide gas power plant integrated with gasification of sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    3. Li, Sheng & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong & Lin, Hu & Jin, Hongguang, 2012. "Evaluation of cost reduction potential for a coal based polygeneration system with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 101-106.
    4. Maruyama, Shigenao & Deguchi, Koji & Chisaki, Masazumi & Okajima, Junnosuke & Komiya, Atsuki & Shirakashi, Ryo, 2012. "Proposal for a low CO2 emission power generation system utilizing oceanic methane hydrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 340-347.
    5. Kaushik, S.C. & Reddy, V. Siva & Tyagi, S.K., 2011. "Energy and exergy analyses of thermal power plants: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1857-1872, May.
    6. Manassaldi, Juan I. & Mussati, Sergio F. & Scenna, Nicolás J., 2011. "Optimal synthesis and design of Heat Recovery Steam Generation (HRSG) via mathematical programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 475-485.
    7. Xu, Zhen & Lu, Yuan & Wang, Bo & Zhao, Lifeng & Xiao, Yunhan, 2021. "Experimental study on the off-design performances of a micro humid air turbine cycle: Thermodynamics, emissions and heat exchange," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Madejski, Paweł & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Exergy analysis of a negative CO2 emission gas power plant based on water oxy-combustion of syngas from sewage sludge gasification and CCS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Zanchini, Enzo & Terlizzese, Tiziano, 2009. "Molar exergy and flow exergy of pure chemical fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1246-1259.
    10. Li, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Na & Cai, Ruixian, 2013. "Low CO2-emissions hybrid solar combined-cycle power system with methane membrane reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 36-44.
    11. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    12. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    13. Paweł Ziółkowski & Stanisław Głuch & Piotr Józef Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2022. "Compact High Efficiency and Zero-Emission Gas-Fired Power Plant with Oxy-Combustion and Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-39, April.
    14. Franzoni, A. & Magistri, L. & Traverso, A. & Massardo, A.F., 2008. "Thermoeconomic analysis of pressurized hybrid SOFC systems with CO2 separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 311-320.
    15. Shareq Mohd Nazir & Olav Bolland & Shahriar Amini, 2018. "Analysis of Combined Cycle Power Plants with Chemical Looping Reforming of Natural Gas and Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Coskun, C. & Oktay, Z. & Ilten, N., 2009. "A new approach for simplifying the calculation of flue gas specific heat and specific exergy value depending on fuel composition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1898-1902.
    17. Marcello De Falco & Gianluca Natrella & Mauro Capocelli & Paulina Popielak & Marcelina Sołtysik & Dariusz Wawrzyńczak & Izabela Majchrzak-Kucęba, 2022. "Exergetic Analysis of DME Synthesis from CO 2 and Renewable Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Liao, Chunhui & Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Zhao, Jianing, 2013. "Energetic and exergetic efficiencies of coal-fired CHP (combined heat and power) plants used in district heating systems of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 671-681.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CO2 capture; Concept comparison; Energy efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:1:p:10-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.