IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i5p1640-d756063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comment on Rogalev et al. Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia. Energies 2021, 14 , 7136

Author

Listed:
  • Miroslav Variny

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

The reconstruction of ageing thermal power plants with the possibility of their increased efficiency, prolonged service and decreased environmental impact is an intensely debated and researched topic nowadays. Among various concepts, the replacement of the steam cycle by a supercritical CO 2 cycle is proposed with the prospect of reaching higher efficiencies at the same working fluid inlet parameters as the ultra-supercritical steam cycles. A paper published previously by Rogalev et al. (2021) analyzed the variants of supercritical coal power plant reconstruction to a supercritical CO 2 cycle and ranked them according to the cycle efficiency. This contribution comments on the scope and applied method in that paper aiming to provide additional input relevant to the decision-making process on thermal power plant reconstruction to such a cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroslav Variny, 2022. "Comment on Rogalev et al. Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia. Energies 2021, 14 , 7136," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-5, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1640-:d:756063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young-Min Kim & Young-Duk Lee & Kook-Young Ahn, 2021. "Parametric Study of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery with Variation in Cold Temperature and Heat Source Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Zhu, Meng & Zhou, Jing & Chen, Lei & Su, Sheng & Hu, Song & Qing, Haoran & Li, Aishu & Wang, Yi & Zhong, Wenqi & Xiang, Jun, 2022. "Economic analysis and cost modeling of supercritical CO2 coal-fired boiler based on global optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    3. DeVynne Farquharson & Paulina Jaramillo & Greg Schivley & Kelly Klima & Derrick Carlson & Constantine Samaras, 2017. "Beyond Global Warming Potential: A Comparative Application of Climate Impact Metrics for the Life Cycle Assessment of Coal and Natural Gas Based Electricity," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(4), pages 857-873, August.
    4. Agbor, Ezinwa & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 433-449.
    5. Andrey Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Ivan Komarov & Sergey Osipov & Olga Zlyvko, 2021. "Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Grammelis, P. & Koukouzas, N. & Skodras, G. & Kakaras, E. & Tumanovsky, A. & Kotler, V., 2006. "Refurbishment priorities at the Russian coal-fired power sector for cleaner energy production--Case studies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 3124-3136, November.
    7. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Tadeusz Skoczkowski & Sławomir Bielecki & Arkadiusz Węglarz & Magdalena Włodarczak & Piotr Gutowski, 2018. "Impact assessment of climate policy on Poland's power sector," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 1303-1349, December.
    9. Andrey Rogalev & Nikolay Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Olga Zlyvko & Andrey Vegera, 2021. "A Study of Low-Potential Heat Utilization Methods for Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Variny, Miroslav & Mierka, Otto, 2011. "Technologic, economic and exergoeconomic evaluation of proposed industrial heat and power plant revamp alternatives in an industrial company in Slovakia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 424-437.
    11. Kefford, Benjamin M. & Ballinger, Benjamin & Schmeda-Lopez, Diego R. & Greig, Chris & Smart, Simon, 2018. "The early retirement challenge for fossil fuel power plants in deep decarbonisation scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 294-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maamoun, Nada & Kennedy, Ryan & Jin, Xiaomeng & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2020. "Identifying coal-fired power plants for early retirement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Miroslav Variny & Dominika Jediná & Miroslav Rimár & Ján Kizek & Marianna Kšiňanová, 2021. "Cutting Oxygen Production-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Improved Compression Heat Management in a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Vladimir Kindra & Nikolay Rogalev & Andrey Rogalev & Vladimir Naumov & Ekaterina Sabanova, 2022. "Thermodynamic Optimization of Low-Temperature Cycles for the Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Adam Dominiak & Artur Rusowicz, 2022. "Change of Fossil-Fuel-Related Carbon Productivity Index of the Main Manufacturing Sectors in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Guorong Chen & Changyan Liu, 2023. "Can Low–Carbon City Development Stimulate Population Growth? Insights from China’s Low–Carbon Pilot Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    7. Ernesto Rivas & María Ángeles Martín-Lara & Gabriel Blázquez & Antonio Pérez & Mónica Calero, 2019. "Column Leaching Tests to Valorize a Solid Waste from the Decommissioning of Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Kun-Hsien Lu & Hsiao-Wei D. Chiang & Pei-Jen Wang, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis of Transcritical CO 2 Cycle Performance Regarding Isentropic Efficiencies of Turbomachinery for Low Temperature Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Mohamed, Usama & Zhao, Yingjie & Huang, Yi & Cui, Yang & Shi, Lijuan & Li, Congming & Pourkashanian, Mohamed & Wei, Guoqiang & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2020. "Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Wu, Zhiqiang & Yang, Wangcai & Meng, Haiyu & Zhao, Jun & Chen, Lin & Luo, Zhengyuan & Wang, Shuzhong, 2017. "Physicochemical structure and gasification reactivity of co-pyrolysis char from two kinds of coal blended with lignocellulosic biomass: Effects of the carboxymethylcellulose sodium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 96-106.
    11. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Le Treut, Gaëlle & Lefèvre, Julien & Lallana, Francisco & Bravo, Gonzalo, 2021. "The multi-level economic impacts of deep decarbonization strategies for the energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    14. Akbari, Maryam & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Kumar, Amit, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of wet and dry torrefaction of biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    15. Cenjie Liu & Zhongbao Zhou & Qing Liu & Rui Xie & Ximei Zeng, 2020. "Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1199-1219, October.
    16. Wu, Zitao & Zhai, Haibo, 2021. "Consumptive life cycle water use of biomass-to-power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    17. Vladimir Kindra & Andrey Rogalev & Evgeny Lisin & Sergey Osipov & Olga Zlyvko, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles with Near-Zero Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Bressanin, Jéssica Marcon & Guimarães, Henrique Real & Chagas, Mateus Ferreira & Sampaio, Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita & Klein, Bruno Colling & Watanabe, Marcos Djun Barbosa & Bonomi, Antonio & Morais, E, 2021. "Advanced technologies for electricity production in the sugarcane value chain are a strategic option in a carbon reward policy context," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    19. Qing, Menglei & Jin, Bo & Ma, Jinchen & Zou, Xixian & Wang, Xiaoyu & Zheng, Chuguang & Zhao, Haibo, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic performance of oxy-combustion power plants integrating chemical looping air separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    20. Carlos Arnaiz del Pozo & Ángel Jiménez Álvaro & Jan Hendrik Cloete & Schalk Cloete & Shahriar Amini, 2020. "Exergy Analysis of Gas Switching Chemical Looping IGCC Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1640-:d:756063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.