IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8007-d437685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthy Living and Co-Production: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes of a Health Promotion Initiative Co-Produced with Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Sabina De Rosis

    (Management and Healthcare Laboratory-Institute of Management and Department EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Francesca Pennucci

    (Management and Healthcare Laboratory-Institute of Management and Department EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Guido Noto

    (Management and Healthcare Laboratory-Institute of Management and Department EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
    Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Sabina Nuti

    (Management and Healthcare Laboratory-Institute of Management and Department EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

Co-production is an approach to designing, delivering, and evaluating public services through strict collaboration among professionals and the people using services with an equal and reciprocal relationship. Health promotion initiatives that include education services rarely use the co-production approach. Nevertheless, the value of co-production is widely recognized, although it is considered a normative good, and scarce and mixed evidence is available in literature. The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that a co-production approach, applied to an intervention for preventing obesity, can be effective and efficient. To this end, an evaluation of the processes, outputs meant as intermediate results, and behavioral and economic outcomes of a public health-promotion initiative co-produced and co-delivered with adolescents (beFood) was conducted. Mixed methods were used, including field-observations, two self-reported questionnaires, and an opportunity–cost analysis that compared beFood to traditional approaches of public health promotion. The co-production model was successfully implemented and appears to be effective—more than 5000 adolescents were reached by only 49 co-producer adolescents, who reported behavioral changes (e.g., eating better and practicing more physical activity). The cost analysis showed that the co-production approach was also efficient, producing relevant savings and potentially making available more than 3000 h of professionals’ time. This research can support a re-thinking of public institutions’ organization, public initiatives’ design, and public servants’ role.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabina De Rosis & Francesca Pennucci & Guido Noto & Sabina Nuti, 2020. "Healthy Living and Co-Production: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes of a Health Promotion Initiative Co-Produced with Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8007-:d:437685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8007/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8007/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Bovaird & Sophie Flemig & Elke Loeffler & Stephen P. Osborne, 2019. "How far have we come with co-production—and what’s next?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 229-232, May.
    2. George C. Patton & Craig A. Olsson & Vegard Skirbekk & Richard Saffery & Mary E. Wlodek & Peter S. Azzopardi & Marcin Stonawski & Bruce Rasmussen & Elizabeth Spry & Kate Francis & Zulfiqar A. Bhutta &, 2018. "Adolescence and the next generation," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7693), pages 458-466, February.
    3. Amorim Marlene & Rosa Maria João & Santos Sandra, 2014. "Managing Customer Participation and Customer Interactions in Service Delivery: the Case of Museums and Educational Services," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 47(3), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Stephen P Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Kirsty Strokosch, 2016. "Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 639-653, May.
    5. Glenn Laverack, 2017. "The Challenge of Behaviour Change and Health Promotion," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-4, October.
    6. George D. Kuh & Ty M. Cruce & Rick Shoup & Jillian Kinzie & Robert M. Gonyea, 2008. "Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(5), pages 540-563, September.
    7. Mariafrancesca Sicilia & Alessandro Sancino & Tina Nabatchi & Enrico Guarini, 2019. "Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 233-240, May.
    8. George C. Patton & Craig A. Olsson & Vegard Skirbekk & Richard Saffery & Mary E. Wlodek & Peter S. Azzopardi & Marcin Stonawski & Bruce Rasmussen & Elizabeth Spry & Kate Francis & Zulfiqar A. Bhutta &, 2018. "Publisher Correction: Adolescence and the next generation," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7712), pages 1-1, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Marsilio & Floriana Fusco & Eleonora Gheduzzi & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2021. "Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldona Fraczkiewicz-Wronka & Anna Kozak, 2021. "Facilitating Co-production in Health Promotion: Study of Senior Councils in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 182-201.
    2. A. Paula Rodriguez Müller & Cesar Casiano Flores & Valerie Albrecht & Trui Steen & Joep Crompvoets, 2021. "A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence on (Digital) Public Services Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Miller, Kathleen K. & Saftner, Melissa A. & McNamara, Meredithe & McMorris, Barbara & Olupot-Olupot, Peter, 2022. "Provision of adolescent health care in Resource-Limited Settings: Perceptions, practices and training needs of Ugandan health care workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Jinpeng Wu & Jing Xiong, 2022. "How Governance Tools Facilitate Citizen Co-Production Behavior in Urban Community Micro-Regeneration: Evidence from Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Nicolette van Gestel & Marlot Kuiper & Wiljan Hendrikx, 2019. "Changed Roles and Strategies of Professionals in the (co)Production of Public Services," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Yewande Adetoro Adewunmi & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Uaurika Kahireke & Prisca Simbanegavi & Sam Mwando & Amin Ally Issa & Samuel Hayford, 2023. "A Multi-Faceted Approach to Improving Public Services in Low-Income Housing in Windhoek, Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING, 2022. "Conclusions and Directions for further Research," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 0, pages 259-274, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    9. Angela Boatman & Bridget Terry Long, 2016. "Does Financial Aid Impact College Student Engagement?," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(6), pages 653-681, September.
    10. Basmah Al-Bogami & Tariq Elyas, 2020. "Promoting Middle School Students’ Engagement Through Incorporating iPad Apps in EFL/ESL Classes," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    11. Md Altab Hossin & Jie Du & Lei Mu & Isaac Owusu Asante, 2023. "Big Data-Driven Public Policy Decisions: Transformation Toward Smart Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    12. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Glenn Laverack, 2018. "Engaging with Migrant Communities: A Framework for Action," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, September.
    15. Dr. Brunilda Zenelaga & Blerina Hamzallari, 2018. "The Role of the Family in the Education of Children in Conflict with the Law: Empirical Evidence from Albanian Context," European Journal of Education Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, September.
    16. Buics, László & Eisinger Balassa, Boglárka, 2020. "Analyzing Public Service Processes from Customer and Employee Perspectives by Using Service Blueprinting and Business Process Modelling," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2020), Virtual Conference, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Virtual Conference, 10-12 September 2020, pages 195-211, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    17. Bartsits, Igor (Барциц, Игорь) & Borshchevskiy, Georgiy (Борщевский, Георгий) & Magomedov, Kerem (Магомедов, Керем), 2018. "Current State and Development Trends of the State Civil Service in Russia [Современное Состояние И Тенденции Развития Государственной Гражданской Службы В России: Аналитический Доклад]," Published Papers 011807, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    18. Yajun Wu & Xia Kang, 2021. "A Moderated Mediation Model of Expectancy-Value Interactions, Engagement, and Foreign Language Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    19. Bergerum, Carolina & Wolmesjö, Maria & Thor, Johan, 2022. "Organising and managing patient and public involvement to enhance quality improvement—Comparing a Swedish and a Dutch hospital," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 603-612.
    20. Karen C. H. Zhoc & Beverley J. Webster & Ronnel B. King & Johnson C. H. Li & Tony S. H. Chung, 2019. "Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES): Development and Psychometric Evidence," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(2), pages 219-244, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8007-:d:437685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.