IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5325-d869246.html

The Determinants of the Environmental Performance of EU Financial Institutions: An Empirical Study with a GLM Model

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantina Ragazou

    (Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR71410 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Ioannis Passas

    (Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR71410 Heraklion, Greece)

  • Alexandros Garefalakis

    (Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR71410 Heraklion, Greece
    Department of Business Administration, Neapolis University Pafos, Paphos 8042, Cyprus)

  • Eleni Zafeiriou

    (Department of Business Administration, Neapolis University Pafos, Paphos 8042, Cyprus
    Department of Agricultural Development, Democritus University of Thrace, GR68200 Orestiada, Greece)

  • Grigorios Kyriakopoulos

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), GR15780 Zografou, Greece)

Abstract

Within the last few decades, the issue of the environmental performance of European financial institutions has become a significant feature of their strategic plans. Financial institutions can contribute through their own activities and investments, and also through their relationship with economic sectors and consumers, in decreasing environmental footprint. The purpose of this research is to investigate the determinants that affect the environmental performance of European financial institutions. Financial markets have been selected as the main research field for this study, as it presents an opportunity for environmental policy and is useful in view of the need for a wider range of policy instruments. Moreover, on a more practical level, financial institutions can interact with the environment in several ways, such as investors, innovators, valuers, powerful stakeholders, and polluters. The study is based on a mixed methodology approach, which integrates: (i) bibliometric analysis based on R package and (ii) panel data analysis with the assistance of a generalized linear model (GLM). Findings show that socioeconomic, governance, and technology factors positively affect the environmental performance of European financial institutions. Moreover, the incorporation of alternative energy sources, such as renewable energy in the corporate function, is a requirement for greening the financial institutions. The above can guide financial institutions to develop the appropriate strategies for decreasing their environmental footprint, improving their operational efficiency, and becoming more attractive and competitive in the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantina Ragazou & Ioannis Passas & Alexandros Garefalakis & Eleni Zafeiriou & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos, 2022. "The Determinants of the Environmental Performance of EU Financial Institutions: An Empirical Study with a GLM Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5325-:d:869246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakil, Mohammad Hassan, 2021. "Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Zaouali, Sana, 2022. "The effects of financial inclusion and the business environment in spurring the creation of early-stage firms and supporting established firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    4. Lingli Qing & Dongphil Chun & Young-Seok Ock & Abd Alwahed Dagestani & Xiang Ma, 2022. "What Myths about Green Technology Innovation and Financial Performance’s Relationship? A Bibliometric Analysis Review," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Idais, Osama, 2020. "Locally optimal designs for multivariate generalized linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Killins, Robert N. & Ngo, Thanh & Wang, Hongxia, 2022. "Financial institution IPOs and regulatory environments," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    7. Cortez, Maria Céu & Andrade, Nuno & Silva, Florinda, 2022. "The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Azhgaliyeva, Dina & Kapsalyamova, Zhanna & Mishra, Ranjeeta, 2022. "Oil price shocks and green bonds: An empirical evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone & Phillip H. Phan, 2012. "Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 885-913, August.
    10. Dumrose, Maurice & Rink, Sebastian & Eckert, Julia, 2022. "Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    11. Richard Welford & Clifford Chan & Michelle Man, 2008. "Priorities for corporate social responsibility: a survey of businesses and their stakeholders," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 52-62, January.
    12. Lööf, Hans & Sahamkhadam, Maziar & Stephan, Andreas, 2022. "Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    13. Zhongju Liao & Manting Zhang, 2020. "The influence of responsible leadership on environmental innovation and environmental performance: The moderating role of managerial discretion," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2016-2027, September.
    14. Kin-Wai Lee & Gillian Hian-Heng Yeo, 2016. "The association between integrated reporting and firm valuation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1221-1250, November.
    15. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Yu Zhang & Anil Kumar & Edmundas Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Measuring the impact of renewable energy, public health expenditure, logistics, and environmental performance on sustainable economic growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 833-843, July.
    16. Sawng, Yeong-wha & Kim, Pang-ryong & Park, JiYoung, 2021. "ICT investment and GDP growth: Causality analysis for the case of Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7).
    17. Potrč, Sanja & Čuček, Lidija & Martin, Mariano & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2021. "Sustainable renewable energy supply networks optimization – The gradual transition to a renewable energy system within the European Union by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 240-260, Summer.
    19. Borghesi, S. & Castellini, M. & Comincioli, N. & Donadelli, M. & Gufler, I. & Vergalli, S., 2022. "European green policy announcements and sectoral stock returns," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Li, Dan & Ferreira, Manuel Portugal, 2011. "Institutional environment and firms' sources of financial capital in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 371-376, April.
    21. Sumit Lodhia & Gerard Stone, 2017. "Integrated Reporting in an Internet and Social Media Communication Environment: Conceptual Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(1), pages 17-33, March.
    22. Christy Glass & Alison Cook & Alicia R. Ingersoll, 2016. "Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance Composition on Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(7), pages 495-511, November.
    23. Li, Menghan & Hamawandy, Nawzad Majeed & Wahid, Fazle & Rjoub, Husam & Bao, Zongke, 2021. "Renewable energy resources investment and green finance: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    24. Kumar, Rajesh, 2014. "Strategies of Banks and Other Financial Institutions," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780124169975.
    25. Shun-Pin Chuang & Sun-Jen Huang, 2018. "The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 991-1009, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Sophia Ioannides & Marios Georgiou & Irene Voukkali & Luca Salvati & Yannis E. Doukas, 2023. "Shaping Sustainable Cities: A Long-Term GIS-Emanated Spatial Analysis of Settlement Growth and Planning in a Coastal Mediterranean European City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska & Anita Fajczak-Kowalska, 2022. "The Impact of Economic Factors on the Sustainable Development of Energy Enterprises: The Case of Bulgaria, Czechia, Estonia and Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Jarosław Brożek & Anna Kożuch & Marek Wieruszewski & Roman Jaszczak & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2024. "Taxonomy Regulation as a New Instrument for the Sustainable Management of the Forest Environment in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Bilgehan Tekin, 2024. "The catalyzing role of financial inclusion in decoding environmental challenges and fostering a sustainable future in BRICS‐T," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 1572-1603, November.
    6. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Ioannis Vannas & George Xydis & Constantinos Vassiliades, 2023. "Homeowners’ Perceptions of Renewable Energy and Market Value of Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Zhang, Cuicheng & Cao, Cong & Zhang, Pengyu & Alvarez, R. Michael & Debnath, Ramit, 2026. "Inequitable efficiency: Unravelling the social and built environment drivers of London's housing energy performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Passas & Konstantina Ragazou & Eleni Zafeiriou & Alexandros Garefalakis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2022. "ESG Controversies: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis for the Sociopolitical Determinants in EU Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    3. Yu Wang & Yetaotao Qiu & Yi Luo, 2022. "CEO foreign experience and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2036-2051, July.
    4. Kirsten Burkhardt & Pascal Nguyen & Evelyne Poincelot, 2020. "Agents of change: Women in top management and corporate environmental performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1591-1604, July.
    5. Tantawy Moussa & Amir Allam & Said Elbanna & Ahmed Bani‐Mustafa, 2020. "Can board environmental orientation improve U.S. firms' carbon performance? The mediating role of carbon strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 72-86, January.
    6. Bogdan Ionut Anghel & Radu Lupu, "undated". "Green Energy Consumption and Stock Performance: Evidence from the German Market," BASIQ Conference Proceedings 2024:055, Bucharest University of Economic Studies.
    7. Abidin Kemeç & Ayşenur Tarakcıoglu Altınay, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Research Trend: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer, RStudio Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace Software Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2020. "Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1127-1144, March.
    9. Yiming Ma & Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad & Riccardo Torelli, 2024. "Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: The moderating role of audit committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5971-5983, November.
    10. Banerjee, Soumendra Nath & Roy, Jayjit & Yasar, Mahmut, 2021. "Exporting and pollution abatement expenditure: Evidence from firm-level data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Sharma, Revti Raman, 2025. "Environmental strategic role orientations of multinational enterprises: Different shades of green," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    12. Vincenzo Vastola & Giovanna Campopiano & Francesco Debellis & Domenico Rocco Cambrea, 2025. "“If you like it Green, put a ring on it”: Married women directors and environmental performance in family and non-family businesses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 203-219, November.
    13. Fan, Pengda & Qian, Xuepeng & Wang, Jian, 2023. "Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Siew Peng Lee & Mansor Isa & Mohammed Sharaf Shaiban, 2025. "Corporate Governance and Greenwashing: The Moderating Role of Political Connection and Sensitive Industries," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    15. Nariman Kandil & Mohamed A. K. Basuony & Mohammed Bouaddi & Hanan Elmoursy & Ahmed F. Elbayuomi, 2025. "Examining CEO Characteristics and Carbon Emissions: A Quantile Approach to UK-Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Yakira Fernández-Torres & Clara Gallego-Sosa & Milagros Gutiérrez-Fernández, 2025. "Do women board members contribute to companies’ superior environmental performance? A literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1513-1565, May.
    17. Chen Liu & Dongmin Kong, 2021. "Business strategy and sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 657-670, January.
    18. Sercan Demiralay & Erhan Kilincarslan & Zezeng Li, 2025. "LGBTQ+ Workplace Inclusion and Corporate Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10785-10802, December.
    19. Salome Zimmermann, 2019. "Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5325-:d:869246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.