IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5732-d1684615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining CEO Characteristics and Carbon Emissions: A Quantile Approach to UK-Listed Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Nariman Kandil

    (Onsi Sawiris School of Business, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Mohamed A. K. Basuony

    (Onsi Sawiris School of Business, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Mohammed Bouaddi

    (Onsi Sawiris School of Business, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Hanan Elmoursy

    (Faculty of Management Technology, German University in Cairo, Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Ahmed F. Elbayuomi

    (Onsi Sawiris School of Business, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt
    Faculty of Commerce, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine the effects of CEO characteristics (gender, nationality, multiple directorships) on the carbon emissions of UK-listed firms. We focus on understanding how these factors influence carbon emissions across the overall sample and within specific industry sectors grounded on the upper echelons and stakeholder theories. We employed a quantitative research design using quantile regression analysis. Our dataset comprises 295 UK-listed firms from the STOXX 600 Index of European-listed companies, covering the period from 1999 to 2023. Data were sourced from BoardEx, Refinitiv DataStream, annual reports, and sustainability reports. Our results indicate that foreign CEOs are associated with higher carbon emissions across the overall sample of UK-listed firms, across the three levels of carbon emitters within the sensitive industries, and within low- and high-level emitters within the non-sensitive industries. CEOs with multiple directorships were found to have a significant association with higher carbon emissions, likely due to divided attention and obligations. As for the CEO gender, it is noteworthy that it has an insignificant effect on reducing carbon emissions in low emission companies within sensitive industries. In contrast, female CEOs were associated with lower carbon emissions in medium-emitting firms within non-sensitive industries. This study contributes to existing literature by employing sensitivity analysis (sensitive sectors and non-sensitive). The study also employs a novel econometric technique, quantile regression, which provides a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between independent and dependent variables across different points of the distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Nariman Kandil & Mohamed A. K. Basuony & Mohammed Bouaddi & Hanan Elmoursy & Ahmed F. Elbayuomi, 2025. "Examining CEO Characteristics and Carbon Emissions: A Quantile Approach to UK-Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5732-:d:1684615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5732/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5732/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merve Kılıç & Cemil Kuzey, 2018. "Determinants of forward-looking disclosures in integrated reporting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 115-144, January.
    2. Duygu Turker, 2018. "What Are the Drivers of Social Responsibility?," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Managing Social Responsibility, chapter 0, pages 17-39, Springer.
    3. Natalia Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana & Juan Alberto Aragon‐Correa, 2015. "Boards and Sustainability: the Contingent Influence of Director Interlocks on Corporate Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 499-517, September.
    4. Dzung Viet Nguyen & Ngan Hoang-Kim Nguyen & Tien Thuy Dinh, 2023. "CEO attributes and firm performance: Evidence from companies listed on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 2282838-228, October.
    5. Idoya Ferrero‐Ferrero & María Ángeles Fernández‐Izquierdo & María Jesús Muñoz‐Torres, 2015. "Integrating Sustainability into Corporate Governance: An Empirical Study on Board Diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 193-207, July.
    6. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone, 2017. "The Power of One to Make a Difference: How Informal and Formal CEO Power Affect Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 293-308, October.
    7. Jibriel Elsayih & Qingliang Tang & Yi-Chen Lan, 2018. "Corporate governance and carbon transparency: Australian experience," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 405-422, September.
    8. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone & Phillip H. Phan, 2012. "Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 885-913, August.
    9. Florence Depoers & Thomas Jeanjean & Tiphaine Jérôme, 2016. "Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 445-461, March.
    10. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    11. Tantawy Moussa & Amir Allam & Said Elbanna & Ahmed Bani‐Mustafa, 2020. "Can board environmental orientation improve U.S. firms' carbon performance? The mediating role of carbon strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 72-86, January.
    12. Frederic Marimon & Mar�a del Mar Alonso-Almeida & Frederic Marimon, 2015. "Difusión de las memorias de sostenibilidad en Latinoamérica: análisis territorial y sectorial," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi.
    13. Moshe Buchinsky, 1998. "Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 33(1), pages 88-126.
    14. Fan, Pengda & Qian, Xuepeng & Wang, Jian, 2023. "Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    16. Jing Lu & Irene M. Herremans, 2019. "Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1449-1464, November.
    17. Ferris, Stephen P. & Jayaraman, Narayanan & Liao, Min-Yu (Stella), 2020. "Better directors or distracted directors? An international analysis of busy boards," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    18. Patricia Kanashiro & Jorge Rivera, 2019. "Do Chief Sustainability Officers Make Companies Greener? The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 687-701, March.
    19. repec:eme:maj000:maj-12-2016-1498 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Janice Hollindale & Pamela Kent & James Routledge & Larelle Chapple, 2019. "Women on boards and greenhouse gas emission disclosures," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 277-308, March.
    21. Renzo Junior & Peter Best & Julie Cotter, 2014. "Sustainability Reporting and Assurance: A Historical Analysis on a World-Wide Phenomenon," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 1-11, March.
    22. Jing Lu & Dongning Yu & Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Jamal A. Nazari & Irene M. Herremans, 2021. "Board interlocks and greenhouse gas emissions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 92-108, January.
    23. Stephen Bear & Noushi Rahman & Corinne Post, 2010. "The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 207-221, December.
    24. Lei Wang & Steven Li & Simon Gao, 2014. "Do Greenhouse Gas Emissions Affect Financial Performance? – an Empirical Examination of Australian Public Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(8), pages 505-519, December.
    25. Maretno Harjoto & Indrarini Laksmana & Robert Lee, 2015. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 641-660, December.
    26. Corinne Post & Noushi Rahman & Cathleen McQuillen, 2015. "From Board Composition to Corporate Environmental Performance Through Sustainability-Themed Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 423-435, August.
    27. Mohammed Bouaddi & Mohamed A. K. Basuony & Neveen Noureldin, 2023. "The Heterogenous Effects of Carbon Emissions and Board Gender Diversity on a Firm’s Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    28. Gregory Jackson & Androniki Apostolakou, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 371-394, July.
    29. Xueji Liang & Lu Dai & Sujuan Xie, 2022. "Examining the social pressures on voluntary CSR reporting: the roles of interlocking directors," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 653-679, January.
    30. Nurlan Orazalin & Monowar Mahmood, 2021. "Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3569-3588, December.
    31. Xueji Liang & Lu Dai & Sujuan Xie, 2022. "Examining the social pressures on voluntary CSR reporting: the roles of interlocking directors," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 653-679, January.
    32. Fizzah Malik & Fangjun Wang & Muhammad Akram Naseem & Amir Ikram & Shahid Ali, 2020. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Related to CEO Attributes: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    33. Muhammad Nadeem & Ernest Gyapong & Ammad Ahmed, 2020. "Board gender diversity and environmental, social, and economic value creation: Does family ownership matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1268-1284, March.
    34. Tricia Ong & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta, 2018. "Corporate governance and sustainability reporting in the Australian resources industry: an empirical analysis," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, November.
    35. Łukasz Matuszak & Ewa Różańska, 2019. "Online corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in the banking industry: evidence from Poland," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(8), pages 1191-1214, September.
    36. Christy Glass & Alison Cook & Alicia R. Ingersoll, 2016. "Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance Composition on Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(7), pages 495-511, November.
    37. Ammar Ali Gull & Nazim Hussain & Sana Akbar Khan & Zaheer Khan & Asif Saeed, 2023. "Governing Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling: The Effect of the Governance Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 349-374, June.
    38. Gary Peters & Andrea Romi, 2014. "Does the Voluntary Adoption of Corporate Governance Mechanisms Improve Environmental Risk Disclosures? Evidence from Greenhouse Gas Emission Accounting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 637-666, December.
    39. Pinglin He & Huayu Shen & Ying Zhang & Jing Ren, 2019. "External Pressure, Corporate Governance, and Voluntary Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    40. Haoyuan Ding & Yichuan Hu & Xiyi Yang & Xiaoyu Zhou, 2022. "Board interlock and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility among Chinese listed firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1287-1320, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bolourian, Soudabeh & Alinaghian, Leila & Angus, Andrew, 2023. "Exploring the role of board-level corporate social responsibility committees in corporate social responsibility performance: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Elisa Menicucci & Guido Paolucci, 2022. "Board Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Italian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Nurlan Orazalin & Monowar Mahmood, 2021. "Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3569-3588, December.
    4. Karaman, Abdullah S. & Elbardan, Hany & Uyar, Ali & Govindan, Kannan, 2025. "Board composition and sustainable supply chain management: Environmental committee's role," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2020. "Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1127-1144, March.
    6. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    7. Francesca Collevecchio & Valerio Temperini & Virginia Barba-Sanchez & Angel Meseguer-Martinez, 2025. "Sustainable Governance: Board Sustainability Experience and the Interplay with Board Age for Firm Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 371-389, March.
    8. Jing Lu & Dongning Yu & Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Jamal A. Nazari & Irene M. Herremans, 2021. "Board interlocks and greenhouse gas emissions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 92-108, January.
    9. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi & Sandro Trento, 2023. "Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 181-251, March.
    10. Vincent Tawiah & Reon Matemane & Babajide Oyewo & Tesfaye T. Lemma, 2024. "Saving the environment with indigenous directors: Evidence from Africa," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2445-2461, March.
    11. Claudio Nuber & Patrick Velte, 2021. "Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1958-1992, May.
    12. Jonathan Taglialatela & Ivan Miroshnychenko & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa, 2024. "Talk or walk? The board of directors and firm environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2890-2910, May.
    13. Sara De Masi, 2021. "Boards Contributing to the Protection of the Environment: Looking at the Dynamics between In-groups and Out-groups," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(2), pages 76-88, April.
    14. Nurshahirah Abd Majid & Amar Hisham Jaaffar & Raed Hussam Mansour Alzoubi, 2023. "The Impact of Women’s Role in Corporate Governance on Carbon Disclosure Performance: A Descriptive Study of Top 100 Global Energy Leaders," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 404-417, November.
    15. María‐Florencia Amorelli & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2021. "Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 537-554, March.
    16. Ayman Issa & Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2022. "Exploring the relationship between female director's profile and sustainability performance: Evidence from the Middle East," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1980-2002, September.
    17. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    18. Yasir Shahab & Ammar Ali Gull & Asad Ali Rind & Aitzaz Ahsan Alias Sarang & Tanveer Ahsan, 2022. "Do corporate governance mechanisms curb the anti-environmental behavior of firms worldwide? An illustration through waste management," Post-Print hal-03602986, HAL.
    19. Konadu, Renata & Ahinful, Gabriel Sam & Boakye, Danquah Jeff & Elbardan, Hany, 2022. "Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Daina Mazutis & Katherine Hanly & Anna Eckardt, 2022. "Sustainability (Is Not) in the Boardroom: Evidence and Implications of Attentional Voids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5732-:d:1684615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.