IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i17p1845-d1737640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification, Evaluation and Adoption of Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Agri-Food Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Adele Annarita Campobasso

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Michel Frem

    (Sinagri s.r.l., Spin Off of the University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Alessandro Petrontino

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Giovanni Tricarico

    (Confcooperative Puglia, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Francesco Bozzo

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

The transition towards sustainable agri-food systems requires understanding factors influencing innovation adoption across agri-food companies. This systematic literature review, following PRISMA methodology, examines innovation types, their intended purposes, and adoption determinants among worldwide stakeholders. Data were extracted from Scopus and Web of Science databases using rigorous selection criteria, covering publications from January 2014 to January 2025. From 775 initial records, 80 publications were selected for quantitative analysis, of these 74 empirical studies included in qualitative analysis. Innovations were categorized based on ecological, economic, social, and institutional purposes, revealing ecological purpose innovations predominated. Subsequently, adoption factors were classified using the tripartite framework based on extrinsic, intrinsic, and intervening variables. Findings reveal developing regions (Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia) representing 65% of studies. Agriculture sector dominated research attention, with cereals as the most investigated value chain, reflecting their fundamental role in global food security and nutrition. Analysis demonstrates that adoption decisions result from complex interactions between external structural conditions, individual psychological factors, and support mechanisms. Results underscore the context-dependent nature of innovation adoption and the need for context-sensitive, multi-stakeholder approaches facilitating sustainable and digital food system transformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Adele Annarita Campobasso & Michel Frem & Alessandro Petrontino & Giovanni Tricarico & Francesco Bozzo, 2025. "Classification, Evaluation and Adoption of Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Agri-Food Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-36, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1845-:d:1737640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1845/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1845/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Anjani & Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Thapa, Ganesh & Adhikari, Naveen & Saroj, Sunil & Karkee, Madhab & Joshi, P.K., 2020. "Adoption and diffusion of improved technologies and production practices in agriculture: Insights from a donor-led intervention in Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Sally Brooks & Michael Loevinsohn, 2011. "Shaping agricultural innovation systems responsive to food insecurity and climate change," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(3), pages 185-200, August.
    3. Colovic, Ana & Caloffi, Annalisa & Rossi, Federica & Russo, Margherita, 2025. "Institutionalising the digital transition: The role of digital innovation intermediaries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    4. Maria Partalidou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Marco Vieri & Stefania Lombardo & Anastasios Michailidis, . "Business model canvas analysis on Greek farms implementing Precision Agriculture," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 19(2).
    5. J. V. N. S. Prasad & N. Loganandhan & P. R. Ramesh & C. A. Rama Rao & B. M. K. Raju & K. V. Rao & A. V. M. Subba Rao & R. Rejani & Sumanta Kundu & Prabhat Kumar Pankaj & C. M. Pradeep & B. V. S. Kiran, 2024. "Assessment of Resilience Due to Adoption of Technologies in Frequently Drought-Prone Regions of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Francesco Bozzo & Michel Frem & Vincenzo Fucilli & Gianluigi Cardone & Paolo Francesco Garofoli & Stefania Geronimo & Alessandro Petrontino, 2022. "Landscape and Vegetation Patterns Zoning Is a Methodological Tool for Management Costs Implications Due to Xylella fastidiosa Invasion," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Juliana Lutz & Barbara Smetschka & Nelson Grima, 2017. "Farmer Cooperation as a Means for Creating Local Food Systems—Potentials and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    9. Nirit Havardi-Burger & Heike Mempel & Vera Bitsch, 2020. "Sustainability Challenges and Innovations in the Value Chain of Flowering Potted Plants for the German Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Fadjry Djufry & Suci Wulandari & Renato Villano, 2022. "Climate Smart Agriculture Implementation on Coffee Smallholders in Indonesia and Strategy to Accelerate," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Nakano, Yuko & Tsusaka, Takuji W. & Aida, Takeshi & Pede, Valerien O., 2018. "Is farmer-to-farmer extension effective? The impact of training on technology adoption and rice farming productivity in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 336-351.
    12. Jamil, Ihsan & Jun, Wen & Mughal, Bushra & Waheed, Junaid & Hussain, Hadi & Waseem, Muhammad, 2021. "Agricultural Innovation: A comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Maurice Osewe & Aijun Liu & Tim Njagi, 2020. "Farmer-Led Irrigation and Its Impacts on Smallholder Farmers’ Crop Income: Evidence from Southern Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Jules Pretty, 2006. "Agroecological Approaches to Agricultural Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 9044, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shrestha, Sujata & Shrestha, Uttam Babu & Shrestha, Bibek Raj & Maharjan, Shirish & Udas, Erica & Aryal, Kamal, 2024. "Determinants of adoption of climate resilient agricultural solutions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Yang, Xin & Zhou, Xiaohe & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2022. "Modeling farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China: An examination of the theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Vu, Ha Thu & Tran, Duc & Goto, Daisaku & Kawata, Keisuke, 2020. "Does experience sharing affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? A randomized controlled trial in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    6. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    7. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    8. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    10. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    11. Mohammed Akhmaaj, Asmaeil Ali & Sharif, Mohamed Omar, 2024. "The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    13. Jacqueline Ruth & Steffen Willwacher & Oliver Korn, 2022. "Acceptance of Digital Sports: A Study Showing the Rising Acceptance of Digital Health Activities Due to the SARS-CoV-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt3047k0dw is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    16. Teodora Roman, 2009. "Study regarding entrepreneurial intentions among students," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 18, pages 87-94.
    17. Messele Kumilachew Aga, 2023. "The mediating role of perceived behavioral control in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Tambo, Justice A. & Wünscher, Tobias, 2016. "Beyond adoption: welfare effects of farmer innovation behavior in Ghana," Discussion Papers 235297, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    19. Kristin Thomas & Evalill Nilsson & Karin Festin & Pontus Henriksson & Mats Lowén & Marie Löf & Margareta Kristenson, 2020. "Associations of Psychosocial Factors with Multiple Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Study of Middle-Aged Men and Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Andreas Falke & Nadine Schröder & Claudia Hofmann, 2022. "The influence of values in sustainable consumption among millennials," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(6), pages 899-928, August.
    21. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1845-:d:1737640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.