IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p389-d1059962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Assessment at the Province Level of Agricultural Science and Technology Development in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Lei

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Jinna Li

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Hao Li

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Jvping Yan

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Panfeng Li

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Yifan Guo

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Xinhui Huang

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Yuting Zheng

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Shaopeng Yang

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Yimin Hu

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Wangsheng Gao

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    National Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology Strategy, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Yuanquan Chen

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    National Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology Strategy, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Science and technology innovation are crucial components underpinning agriculture. We constructed an evaluation framework including 4 pillars and 21 indicators, taking 31 provinces in China as examples to examine the level of agriculture science and technology development from a regional perspective. We found that there is an obvious gap between east and west nationwide, and that only about half of the provinces have reached the high and medium levels. It was worth noting that the innovation conditions in Shanghai and Beijing presented huge advantages, of vital importance to a first-class talent team, a complete innovation system, a stable and prosperous market, and active exchanges and cooperation. In addition, to maximize the transformation of agricultural science and technology achievements into real productivity, local government should also strengthen the construction of agricultural research and innovation platforms, technology transfer, and transformation of results. The findings advance understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation subjects’ agricultural science and technology development from a regional perspective and are expected to provide some basis for the government and stakeholders to make relevant decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Lei & Jinna Li & Hao Li & Jvping Yan & Panfeng Li & Yifan Guo & Xinhui Huang & Yuting Zheng & Shaopeng Yang & Yimin Hu & Wangsheng Gao & Yuanquan Chen, 2023. "Regional Assessment at the Province Level of Agricultural Science and Technology Development in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:389-:d:1059962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tianqi Wang & Lijun Huang, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Agricultural Science and Technology Input and Agricultural Economic Growth Based on E-Commerce Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Alan L. Olmstead, 2020. "Historical and Institutional Perspectives on American Agricultural Development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 400-418, March.
    3. Klerkx, Laurens & Begemann, Stephanie, 2020. "Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Xiangyu Guo & Canhui Deng & Dan Wang & Xu Du & Jiali Li & Bowen Wan, 2021. "International Comparison of the Efficiency of Agricultural Science, Technology, and Innovation: A Case Study of G20 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Chu, Angus C. & Peretto, Pietro F. & Wang, Xilin, 2022. "Agricultural revolution and industrialization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Beintema, Nienke M. & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Stads, Gert-Jan, 2020. "ASTI global update 2020," ASTI summary notes 134029, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Hellerstein, Daniel & Vilorio, Dennis, 2019. "Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2019," Economic Information Bulletin 288293, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Heisey, Paul W & Fuglie, Keith O., 2018. "Agricultural Research Investment and Policy Reform in High-Income Countries," Economic Research Report 276235, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Läpple, Doris & Renwick, Alan & Thorne, Fiona, 2015. "Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2019. "Determinants and impacts of public agricultural research: product-level evidence from agricultural Kohsetsushi in Japan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1475-1498, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlson, Andrea & Greene, Catherine & Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon & Hitaj, Claudia & Ha, Kim & Cavigelli, Michel & Ferrier, Peyton & McBride, William, 2023. "U.S. Organic Production, Markets, Consumers, and Policy, 2000-21," USDA Miscellaneous 333551, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Hu, Yue & Liu, Chang & Peng, Jiangang, 2021. "Financial inclusion and agricultural total factor productivity growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 68-82.
    4. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Hertel, By Thomas W. & Baldos, Uris L.C. & Fuglie, Keith O., 2020. "Trade in technology: A potential solution to the food security challenges of the 21st century," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Ismael Cristofer Baierle & Francisco Tardelli da Silva & Ricardo Gonçalves de Faria Correa & Jones Luís Schaefer & Matheus Becker Da Costa & Guilherme Brittes Benitez & Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara, 2022. "Competitiveness of Food Industry in the Era of Digital Transformation towards Agriculture 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Gangopadhyay, Kausik & Mondal, Debasis, 2021. "Productivity, relative sectoral prices, and total factor productivity: Theory and evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Chu, Angus C. & Furukawa, Yuichi & Wang, Xilin, 2022. "Rent-seeking government and endogenous takeoff in a Schumpeterian economy," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. L. Toma & A. P. Barnes & L.-A. Sutherland & S. Thomson & F. Burnett & K. Mathews, 2018. "Impact of information transfer on farmers’ uptake of innovative crop technologies: a structural equation model applied to survey data," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 864-881, August.
    10. Bellink, Miriam & Verburg, René W., 2023. "A system lock-in blocks the uptake of mixed sustainable Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Alisa Ableeva & Guzel Salimova & Rasul Gusmanov & Tatyana Lubova & Oleg Efimov & Almira Farrahetdinova, 2019. "The Role of Agriculture in the Formation of Macroeconomic Indicators of National Economy," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(4), pages 183-193.
    12. Efthymios Rodias & Remigio Berruto & Patrizia Busato & Dionysis Bochtis & Claus Grøn Sørensen & Kun Zhou, 2017. "Energy Savings from Optimised In-Field Route Planning for Agricultural Machinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Metta, Matteo & Ciliberti, Stefano & Obi, Chinedu & Bartolini, Fabio & Klerkx, Laurens & Brunori, Gianluca, 2022. "An integrated socio-cyber-physical system framework to assess responsible digitalisation in agriculture: A first application with Living Labs in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Muyambiri, Brian, 2024. "The role of agriculture, industry and the service sector in economic growth: The case of Mozambique," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(2), January.
    15. Balaine, Lorraine & Dillon, Emma J. & Läpple, Doris & Lynch, John, 2020. "Can technology help achieve sustainable intensification? Evidence from milk recording on Irish dairy farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Nicholas A. Kirk & Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry, 2022. "Land Management Change as Adaptation to Climate and Other Stressors: A Systematic Review of Decision Contexts Using Values-Rules-Knowledge," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Mangirdas Morkunas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "In a Search for Equity: Do Direct Payments under the Common Agricultural Policy Induce Convergence in the European Union?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    19. Hrozencik, Aaron & Aillery, Marcel, 2021. "Trends in U.S. Irrigated Agriculture: Increasing Resilience Under Water Supply Scarcity," USDA Miscellaneous 316792, United States Department of Agriculture.
    20. Akimowicz, Mikaël & Del Corso, Jean-Pierre & Gallai, Nicola & Képhaliacos, Charilaos, 2022. "The leader, the keeper, and the follower? A legitimacy perspective on the governance of varietal innovation systems for climate changes adaptation. The case of sunflower hybrids in France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:389-:d:1059962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.