IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i3p253-d518940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Mirosław Biczkowski

    (Department of Spatial Planning and Tourism, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Torun, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle

    (Department of Socio-Economic Geography and Tourism, Institute of Geography, Kazimierz Wielki University, Plac Kościeleckich 8, 85-033 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Roman Rudnicki

    (Department of Spatial Planning and Tourism, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Torun, Poland)

Abstract

The paper’s main aim is to assess the measures implemented within the Rural Development Program (RDP) 2007–2013 in Poland. This programme is dedicated to the diversification of business activities in rural areas and rural livelihood and, thus, the improvement of the multifunctionality of rural areas. The analysis covered two measures from Axis 3, Improvement of the quality of life in rural areas and diversification of rural economy: M311, diversification into non-agricultural activities; and M312, Establishment and development of micro-enterprise. The study and the discussion are presented from a geographical perspective and, in a broader context, take into account several conditions (natural, urban, agricultural and historical) and the spatial diversity of the allocation of European Union (EU) funds. Models of a policy of multifunctional rural development, implemented after accession to the EU, are presented. The research’s spatial scope covers Poland’s territory on two spatial scales: the system of regions (16 NUTS2 units) and poviats (314 LAU level 1 units). The analysis covers all the projects implemented in Poland under the two measures of Axis 3 of the RDP 2007–2013. A set of conditions was prepared for all LAU1 units, forming the background for assessing the impact of the EU funds on the development of non-agricultural activities. To determine the relationship between the RDP measures and the selected groups of conditions, a synthetic index and a correlation index are used. They are also used to determine the mutual relations between the two analyzed activities in terms of the spatial scales used. Access to the EU funds (RDP) has considerably enlarged the opportunities for accelerating agricultural modernisation and restructuration towards multifunctional development, as well as the opportunities for implementing new development and work methods in the countryside in Poland. The attractiveness of the two studied RDP measures varied across regions. The beneficiaries’ activity depended on the local potential (resources), culture and tradition of the region, and size and potential of the farm. In the areas where agriculture is deeply rooted, beneficiaries were more willing to engage in ventures tapping into the resources available in their farms. Thus, they create additional livelihood of income and workplaces for household members. In turn, the beneficiaries from the areas where farms are smaller and economically weaker often undertake activities related to setting up a new business (outside farming).

Suggested Citation

  • Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:253-:d:518940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/3/253/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/3/253/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Audretsch & Max Keilbach, 2005. "Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 39(3), pages 457-469, September.
    2. Tudor, Monica Mihaela, 2015. "Small scale agriculture as a resilient system in rural Romania," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 117(1), pages 1-8, April.
    3. Julian Clark, 2009. "Entrepreneurship and diversification on English farms: Identifying business enterprise characteristics and change processes," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 213-236, March.
    4. Henk Renting & Henk Oostindie & Catherine Laurent & Gianluca Brunori & Dominique Barjolle & Anne Moxnes Jervell & Leo Granberg & Maarit Heinonen, 2008. "Multifunctionality of agricultural activities, changing rural identities and new institutional arrangements," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4/5), pages 361-385.
    5. Mikaela Backman & Charlie Karlsson, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and Age Across Time and Space," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(3), pages 371-385, July.
    6. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus & Małgorzata Szczepanek, 2020. "Tourism Competitiveness of Rural Areas: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Patrick Caron & Ernest Reig & Dirk Roep & Werner Hediger & Tristan Le Cotty & Denis Barthelemy & Anna Hadynska & Jakub Hadynski & Henk A. Oostindie & Eric Sabourin, 2008. "Multifunctionality: refocusing a spreading, loose and fashionable concept for looking at sustainability?," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4/5), pages 301-318.
    8. Sadik-Zada, Elkhan Richard & Gatto, Andrea, 2021. "The puzzle of greenhouse gas footprints of oil abundance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Bazyli Czyżewski & Marta Guth, 2021. "Impact of Policy and Factor Intensity on Sustainable Value of European Agriculture: Exploring Trade-Offs of Environmental, Economic and Social Efficiency at the Regional Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Andrea Morrison & Lucia Cusmano, 2015. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalisation, Knowledge and Institutional Change: Towards an Evolutionary Perspective to Economic Development," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 133-139, April.
    11. Sylvie Ferrari & M. Rambonilaza, 2008. "Agricultural multifunctionality promoting policies and the safeguarding of rural landscapes: how to evaluate the link?," Post-Print hal-00248519, HAL.
    12. Nicola Meccheri & Gianluigi Pelloni, 2006. "Rural entrepreneurs and institutional assistance: an empirical study from mountainous Italy," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 371-392, September.
    13. Jinhong Wan & Ruoxi Li & Wenxin Wang & Zhongmei Liu & Bizhen Chen, 2016. "Income Diversification: A Strategy for Rural Region Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    14. Catherine C. Benjamin, 1994. "The growing importance of diversification activities for French farm households [L'importance croissante des activités de diversification des ménages agricoles français]," Post-Print hal-02847751, HAL.
    15. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Innovations in Agritourism: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Wang, Gang-Jin & Xie, Chi & Chen, Shou & Yang, Jiao-Jiao & Yang, Ming-Yan, 2013. "Random matrix theory analysis of cross-correlations in the US stock market: Evidence from Pearson’s correlation coefficient and detrended cross-correlation coefficient," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3715-3730.
    17. Xiang Li & Shuang Xu & Yecui Hu, 2020. "Understanding the Rural Livelihood Stability System: The Eco-Migration in Huanjiang County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Catherine Benjamin, 1994. "The growing importance of diversification activities for French farm households," Post-Print hal-01937035, HAL.
    19. Salasan, Cosmin & Curtiss, Jarmila & Gomez y Paloma, Gomez & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Fritzsch, Jana & Wegener, Stefan & Glauben, Thomas & Hockmann, Heinrich & Moller, Lioudmila & Pieniadz, Agata & Ren, 2009. "Structural change in Europe’s rural regions – Farm livelihoods between subsistence orientation, modernisation and non-farm diversification," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 53334, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Chaplin, Hannah & Davidova, Sophia & Gorton, Matthew, 2002. "Non-Agricultural Diversification of Farm Households and Corporate Farms in Central Europe," Workshop on the Farm Household-Firm Unit: Its Importance in Agriculture and Implications for Statistics, April 12-13,2002, Wye Campus, Imperial College 15728, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    21. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada & Mattia Ferrari, 2020. "Environmental Policy Stringency, Technical Progress and Pollution Haven Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    22. Martinát, Stanislav & Navrátil, Josef & Dvořák, Petr & Van der Horst, Dan & Klusáček, Petr & Kunc, Josef & Frantál, Bohumil, 2016. "Where AD plants wildly grow: The spatio-temporal diffusion of agricultural biogas production in the Czech Republic," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 85-97.
    23. Scott Rozelle & Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2004. "Success and Failure of Reform: Insights from the Transition of Agriculture," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 404-456, June.
    24. Dil Bahadur Rahut & Khondoker Abdul Mottaleb & Akhter Ali, 2018. "Rural Livelihood Diversification Strategies and Household Welfare in Bhutan," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(4), pages 718-748, September.
    25. Terry Marsden & Jo Banks & Gillian Bristow, 2002. "The Social Management of Rural Nature: Understanding Agrarian-Based Rural Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 809-825, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirosław Biczkowski & Roman Rudnicki & Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk & Łukasz Wiśniewski & Mariusz Kistowski & Paweł Wiśniewski, 2023. "Neo-colonialism in the Polish rural world: CAP approach and the phenomenon of suitcase farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 667-691, June.
    2. Štefan Bojnec & Kristina Knific, 2021. "Farm Household Income Diversification as a Survival Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Žana Jurjević & Stanislav Zekić & Danilo Đokić & Bojan Matkovski, 2021. "Regional Spatial Approach to Differences in Rural Economic Development: Insights from Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Monika Kozłowska-Adamczak & Patrycja Essing-Jelonkiewicz & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle, 2023. "Leveraging Information and Communication Technologies in Forest Ecotourism: A Case Study from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Marta Gwiaździńska-Goraj & Małgorzata Dudzińska, 2022. "Environmental, Social, and Economic Aspects of the Green Economy in Polish Rural Areas—A Spatial Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Grebowiec Mariusz, 2022. "Changes in the Process of Cooperation in Contemporary Agriculture and Directions and Dynamics of Changes on the Example of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 31-45.
    7. Paweł Wiśniewski & Roman Rudnicki & Mariusz Kistowski & Łukasz Wiśniewski & Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk & Kazimierz Niecikowski, 2021. "Mapping of EU Support for High Nature Value Farmlands, from the Perspective of Natural and Landscape Regions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Dono, Gabriele & Buttinelli, Rebecca & Cortignani, Raffaele, 2022. "Financial performance of connected Agribusiness activities in Italian agriculture," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    10. Roman Rudnicki & Mirosław Biczkowski & Łukasz Wiśniewski & Paweł Wiśniewski & Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska, 2023. "Towards Green Agriculture and Sustainable Development: Pro-Environmental Activity of Farms under the Common Agricultural Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Ramona Pîrvu & Laurențiu Dragomir & Bogdan Budică & Răducu-Ștefan Bratu & Sorin Dinulescu & Lili Țenea, 2022. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Rural Development: The Case of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Fałkowski & Maciej Jakubowski & Paweł Strawiński, 2014. "Returns from income strategies in rural Poland," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 139-178, January.
    2. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Sadik-Zada, Elkhan Richard & Gatto, Andrea, 2023. "Civic engagement and energy transition in the Nordic-Baltic Sea Region: Parametric and nonparametric inquiries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    4. Mukherjee, Swayambhu & Kar, Saibal, 2020. "Leveraging Non-Farm Income: Micro-evidence of Occupational Choice for Rural Households in India," MPRA Paper 109940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2020. "Drivers of CO 2 -Emissions in Fossil Fuel Abundant Settings: (Pooled) Mean Group and Nonparametric Panel Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, August.
    6. M. Farzana Halim & Carla Barbieri & Duarte B. Morais & Susan Jakes & Erin Seekamp, 2020. "Beyond Economic Earnings: The Holistic Meaning of Success for Women in Agritourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Ana Isabel Polo-Peña & Dolores Maria Frías-Jamilena & Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Molina, 2012. "Marketing practices in the Spanish rural tourism sector and their contribution to business outcomes," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7-8), pages 503-521, September.
    8. Chaplin, Hannah & Davidova, Sophia & Gorton, Matthew, 2003. "Agricultural Adjustment And The Diversification Of Farm Households In Central Europe," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25843, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Die Li & Sumin Hu, 2021. "How Does Technological Innovation Mediate the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Sondell, Erik & Francès Tudel, Gemma & Rosell Foxà, Jordi & Wibergs, Ulf, 2000. "The Measurement Of On-Farm Diversification," ERSA conference papers ersa00p245, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Jinsong Zhang & Yiding Wang, 2023. "The Construction of the Landscape- and Village-Integrated Green Governance System Based on the Entropy Method: A Study from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Adis Puška & Dragan Pamucar & Ilija Stojanović & Fausto Cavallaro & Arturas Kaklauskas & Abbas Mardani, 2021. "Examination of the Sustainable Rural Tourism Potential of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina Using a Fuzzy Approach Based on Group Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Banski, Jerzy, 2003. "Transforming the functional structure of Poland’s rural areas," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 1, pages 1-19.
    14. Pamela Palmi & Greta Enrica Lezzi, 2020. "How Authenticity and Tradition Shift into Sustainability and Innovation: Evidence from Italian Agritourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    15. YoungSeok Hwang & Jung-Sup Um & JunHwa Hwang & Stephan Schlüter, 2020. "Evaluating the Causal Relations between the Kaya Identity Index and ODIAC-Based Fossil Fuel CO 2 Flux," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Rosa Maria Arnaldo Valdés & Victor Fernando Gomez Comendador & Luis Manuel Braga Campos, 2021. "How Much Can Carbon Taxes Contribute to Aviation Decarbonization by 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Maryam Mahmoodi & Michał Roman & Piotr Prus, 2022. "Features and Challenges of Agritourism: Evidence from Iran and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Jianguo Du & Jing Zhang & Xingwei Li, 2020. "What Is the Mechanism of Resource Dependence and High-Quality Economic Development? An Empirical Test from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Na Hou & Qianying Zhu & Jinlin Yang & Dahong Zhang & Wenwen Liu & Hong Chang, 2021. "The Impact of Environmental Governance on the Development of Fishery Economy—The Intermediary Role of Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Marcin Surówka & Łukasz Popławski & Helena Fidlerová, 2021. "Technical Infrastructure as an Element of Sustainable Development of Rural Regions in Małopolskie Voivodeship in Poland and Trnava Region in Slovakia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:253-:d:518940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.