IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i10p390-d1766846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Performance Evaluation: Strategic Alignment in the Service Sector Through a Case-Based Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Maria C Tavares

    (Higher Institute of Accounting and Administration of University of Aveiro (ISCA-UA), 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Mariana Vaz

    (Higher Institute of Accounting and Administration of University of Aveiro (ISCA-UA), 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Performance management is critical for aligning human capital with organizational strategy, particularly in the increasingly competitive service sector. However, universally effective performance appraisal systems (PASs) exist, as effectiveness depends on contextual and organizational specificities. In Portugal, where services account for nearly three-quarters of gross value added, PAS implementation remains underdeveloped, highlighting a gap between strategic intent and practice. This study aims to address that gap by investigating how a performance appraisal model can be tailored to the service sector. A case study was conducted at PCI—Creative Science Park, S.A., a consulting firm, using a qualitative approach. The research design combined a literature review to identify theoretical dimensions of performance evaluation with an employee questionnaire to capture organizational perceptions and priorities. Integration of both strands of evidence informed the construction of the framework. The findings indicate that employees value objective-based evaluation as the most relevant dimension, complemented by customer feedback, adaptive performance, and organizational citizenship. Furthermore, the integration of 360° feedback mechanisms and regular review cycles emerged as key enablers of fairness and engagement. By combining theoretical insights with employee perspectives, this study contributes to a customized and flexible PAS that enhances strategic alignment in the service sector. The proposed model provides both scholarly value, by advancing the discussion on context-specific PAS design, and practical value, by offering a reference for organizations seeking to align human performance with mission-critical outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria C Tavares & Mariana Vaz, 2025. "Rethinking Performance Evaluation: Strategic Alignment in the Service Sector Through a Case-Based Framework," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:390-:d:1766846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/10/390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/10/390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gill & Zdenka Kissová & Jaesun Lee & Victoria Prowse, 2019. "First-Place Loving and Last-Place Loathing: How Rank in the Distribution of Performance Affects Effort Provision," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 494-507, February.
    2. Abdel-Razik, Madiha Said Mohamed & Rizk, Hoda Ibrahim & Zein, Marwa M. & Abdel-Megeid, Soad Mohammed El Sayed & Abd El Fatah, Shaimaa A.M., 2023. "Promoting the culture of key performance indicators (KPIs) among primary health care staff at health district level: An intervention study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Waseem Bahadur & Saira Aziz & Salman Zulfiqar, 2018. "Effect of employee empathy on customer satisfaction and loyalty during employee–customer interactions: The mediating role of customer affective commitment and perceived service quality," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1491780-149, January.
    4. Donghun Yoon, 2021. "How Can Personnel Performance Evaluation Systems Be Improved?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    5. Carrie Dusterhoff & J. Cunningham & James MacGregor, 2014. "The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader–Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgment Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 265-273, January.
    6. Ramous Agyare & Ge Yuhui & Lavish Mensah & Zipporah Aidoo & Isaac Opoku Ansah, 2016. "The Impacts of Performance Appraisal on Employees’ Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment: A Case of Microfinance Institutions in Ghana," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 281-281, August.
    7. Hilco J. van Elten, 2017. "Relative performance evaluation among business unit level managers," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 185-204, July.
    8. Gaudet, Marie-Claude & Tremblay, Michel, 2017. "Initiating structure leadership and employee behaviors: The role of perceived organizational support, affective commitment and leader–member exchange," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 663-675.
    9. Prithwiraj (Raj) Choudhury & Cirrus Foroughi & Barbara Larson, 2021. "Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 655-683, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ro’i Zultan & Eldar Dadon, 2023. "Missing the forest for the trees: when monitoring quantitative measures distorts task prioritization," Working Papers 2319, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    2. repec:rim:rimwps:25-04 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Tim Klausmann, 2021. "Feedback in Homogeneous Ability Groups: A Field Experiment," Working Papers 2114, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    4. Alessandra Fenizia & Tom Kirchmaier, 2024. "Not incentivized yet efficient: Working from home in the public sector," CEP Discussion Papers dp2036, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Vanessa, Mertins & Jeworrek, Sabrina & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2018. ""The Good News about Bad News": Feedback about Past Organisational Failure Bad ist Impact in Worker Productivity," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181644, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Stefan, Matthias & Huber, Jürgen & Kirchler, Michael & Sutter, Matthias & Walzl, Markus, 2023. "Monetary and social incentives in multi-tasking: The ranking substitution effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Jamie L. Gloor & Manuela Morf & Samantha Paustian-Underdahl & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2020. "Fix the Game, Not the Dame: Restoring Equity in Leadership Evaluations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 497-511, January.
    8. Dohmen, Thomas & Non, Arjan & Stolp, Tom, 2021. "Reference points and the tradeoff between risk and incentives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 813-831.
    9. Norlander, Peter & Erickson, Christopher, 2022. "The Role of Institutions in Job Teleworkability Before and After the Covid-19 Pandemic," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1172, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Changhyun Kim & Yoonseok Zang & Heli Wang & Kate Niu, 2024. "When Do Corporate Good Deeds Become a Burden? The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Following Negative Events," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 285-306, June.
    11. Anna Ulrichshofer & Markus Walzl, 2020. "Social Comparison and Optimal Contracts in the Competition for Managerial Talent," Working Papers 2020-19, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    12. Legge, Stefan & Schmid, Lukas, 2016. "Media attention and betting markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 304-333.
    13. Barrero, Jose Maria & Bloom, Nick & Davis, Steven J., 2020. "Why Working From Home Will Stick," SocArXiv wfdbe, Center for Open Science.
    14. Liu, Dewen & Han, Shenghao & Zhang, Jieqiong, 2022. "The golden mean: Research on the mechanism of customer participation in employee service innovation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Bei Liu & Hong Chen & Xin Gan, 2019. "How Much Is Too Much? The Influence of Work Hours on Social Development: An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Rigissa Megalokonomou & Yi Zhang, 2022. "How Good Am I? Effects and Mechanisms behind Salient Ranks," CESifo Working Paper Series 9991, CESifo.
    17. Pablo Zarate & Mathias Dolls & Steven J. Davis & Nicholas Bloom & Jose Maria Barrero & Cevat Giray Aksoy, 2024. "Why Does Working from Home Vary across Countries and People?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11081, CESifo.
    18. Choudhury, Prithwiraj, 2022. "Geographic mobility, immobility, and geographic flexibility: a review and agenda for research on the changing geography of work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128783, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Duede, Eamon & Teplitskiy, Misha & Lakhani, Karim & Evans, James, 2024. "Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    20. Shinya Kajitani & Keiichi Morimoto & Shiba Suzuki, 2020. "Information feedback in relative grading: Evidence from a field experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    21. Cong Cheng & Zefeng Miao, 2025. "Leveraging digital connectivity for innovation performance: a fsQCA study on Chinese high-tech manufacturing firms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:390-:d:1766846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.