IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i12p254-d1298187.html

From Start to Scale: Navigating Innovation, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, and Strategic Evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Katja Crnogaj

    (Department of Entrepreneurship and Business Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Matej Rus

    (Department of Entrepreneurship and Business Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

In the contemporary business environment, startups have emerged as significant employment contributors, particularly in mature startup ecosystems, such as the United States. However, Europe, with a particular focus on Slovenia, represents an unexplored avenue in this area. As startups make the transition to scaleups, they face numerous challenges. Our study aims to comprehend the dynamics that affect startups during this crucial phase, focusing on the relationship between entrepreneurial motivations, the startup ecosystem, and their strategic adaptability. We undertook a primary survey among Slovenian startup and scaleup companies, and we utilized factor and regression analysis as the primary tools for conducting a thorough data analysis. The research underscores the symbiotic relationship between tailored business strategies, innovation, and growth challenges. To achieve successful transition from startup to scaleup, it is a strategic necessity for businesses to harness their innovative capacities. Our research pioneers the inclusion of Slovenia within the European startup landscape, providing insight into the unique challenges and opportunities inherent to the region. The findings advocate for a holistic approach in the startup ecosystem, reinforcing the significance of a multifaceted support system for these budding enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Katja Crnogaj & Matej Rus, 2023. "From Start to Scale: Navigating Innovation, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, and Strategic Evolution," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:254-:d:1298187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/12/254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/12/254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Aghion & Nick Bloom & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt, 2005. "Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 120(2), pages 701-728.
    2. A. Rebecca Reuber & Esther Tippmann & Sinéad Monaghan, 2021. "Global scaling as a logic of multinationalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(6), pages 1031-1046, August.
    3. Erevelles, Sunil & Fukawa, Nobuyuki & Swayne, Linda, 2016. "Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 897-904.
    4. Esteban Lafuente & Zoltan J. Acs & Mark Sanders & László Szerb, 2021. "Correction to: The global technology frontier: productivity growth and the relevance of Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1783-1783, April.
    5. Henry Kaiser, 1974. "An index of factorial simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 31-36, March.
    6. Alexander McKelvie & Anna Brattström & Karl Wennberg, 2017. "How young firms achieve growth: reconciling the roles of growth motivation and innovative activities," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 273-293, August.
    7. Rosenbusch, Nina & Brinckmann, Jan & Bausch, Andreas, 2011. "Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 441-457, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Napoli, Pedro Henrique & Fischer, Bruno Brandão & Moraes, Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de, 2025. "Entrepreneurial agency reloaded: Intentions, capabilities and the dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    2. Parisa Jourabchi Amirkhizi & Farshad Zeyghami & Morteza Pourmohamadi, 2026. "Investigating the use of design thinking in identifying wicked problems of startups," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-34, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafiou Raphaël Bétila, 2021. "The impact of Ease of Doing Business on economic growth: a dynamic panel analysis for African countries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Anabela Santos & Karel Haegeman & Pietro Moncada-Paternó-Castello, 2021. "The impact of Covid-19 and of the earlier crisis on firms’ innovation and growth: a comparative analysis," JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis 2021-03, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Somohano Rodríguez, Francisco M. & López Fernández, José Manuel & Martínez García, Francisco Javier, 2018. "El efecto de la innovación en el resultado empresarial durante la recesión económica. Una aplicación a la industria de la automoción," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 91-105.
    4. Khwazi Magubane, 2025. "Determinants of Financial Stability and Development in South Africa: Insights from a Quantile ARDL Model of the South African Financial Cycle," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-34, September.
    5. Amaia Altuzarra, 2024. "Innovation Persistence and Firm Growth: Do They Go Hand in Hand?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 18590-18616, December.
    6. Sufia Mohand-Amar & María del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes & Matilde Ruiz-Arroyo, 2024. "The relationship between high growth expectations and new venture creation in nascent entrepreneurs: The key role of competitive innovation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 2323-2345, September.
    7. André Dumas Tsambou & Yannick Fosso Djoumessi, 2026. "Do Non-technological Innovations Enhance Competitive Advantage? Evidence from the Manufacturing and Service Sectors in Senegal," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(2), pages 5068-5096, April.
    8. Wenyue Cui & Jie Tang & Shuai Yuan & Xin Dai, 2025. "Innovation Convergence: A System Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 13349-13392, September.
    9. Cadden, Trevor & Weerawardena, Jay & Cao, Guangming & Duan, Yanqing & McIvor, Ronan, 2023. "Examining the role of big data and marketing analytics in SMEs innovation and competitive advantage: A knowledge integration perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    11. Nicholas Bloom & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2015. "Do Private Equity Owned Firms Have Better Management Practices?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 442-446, May.
    12. Veasna Trakem & Hongzhong Fan & Dyna Sam & Sokhan Chen, 2026. "How do agricultural trade liberalization, climate variability and change, and governance quality influence food security in ASEAN?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 18(2), pages 495-540, April.
    13. Herrmann, Roland & Schröck, Rebecca, 2011. "Determinanten des Innovationserfolgs: eine Analyse mit Scannerdaten für den deutschen Joghurtmarkt," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(03), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Lillemo, Shuling Chen, 2014. "Measuring the effect of procrastination and environmental awareness on households' energy-saving behaviours: An empirical approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 249-256.
    15. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman & Eugenio Proto, 2014. "Smithian Growth through Creative Organization," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(5), pages 796-811, December.
    18. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.
    19. Tomaso Duso & Martin Peitz, 2026. "Aligning Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in the EU ±," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-35, December.
    20. Benjamin Montmartin & Nadine Massard, 2015. "Is Financial Support For Private R&D Always Justified? A Discussion Based On The Literature On Growth," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 479-505, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:254-:d:1298187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.