IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedhep/y1997ijanp2-13nv.21no.1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrialization in hog production: implications for Midwest agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Gary L. Benjamin

Abstract

Mega producers have ushered in a new era for Midwest agriculture and amplified the growing environmental concerns associated with concentrated animal agriculture. The combination threatens to undermine the Midwest's long-held dominance in hog production and processing.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary L. Benjamin, 1997. "Industrialization in hog production: implications for Midwest agriculture," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 21(Jan), pages 2-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedhep:y:1997:i:jan:p:2-13:n:v.21no.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/economic_perspectives/1997/epjf97a.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dermot J. Hayes & Daniel M. Otto & John D. Lawrence, 1996. "Pork Production in Iowa: An Industry at a Crossroads," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 96-bp10, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Gollehon, Noel R. & Caswell, Margriet & Ribaudo, Marc & Kellogg, Robert L. & Lander, Charles & Letson, David, 2000. "Confined Animal Production And Manure Nutrients," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36382, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Letson, David & Gollehon, Noel R., 1996. "Confined Animal Production and the Manure Problem," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(3), pages 1-5.
    4. V. James Rhodes, 1995. "The Industrialization of Hog Production," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 107-118.
    5. Hurt, Christopher, 1994. "Industrialization in the Pork Industry," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 9(4), pages 1-5.
    6. Alan Barkema & Michael L. Cook, 1993. "The changing U.S. pork industry: a dilemma for public policy," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 78(Q II), pages 49-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martinez, Stephen W., 1998. "Consumer Interests In Vertical Coordination In The Pork And Broiler Industries," Agricultural Outlook Forum 1998 33241, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary L. Benjamin, 1996. "Industrialization in hog production: implications for Midwest agriculture," Assessing the Midwest Economy RE-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    2. Castle, Emery N., 1998. "Agricultural Industrialization in the American Countryside," Policy Studies Program Reports, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, number 134118, March.
    3. Bryan J. HUBBELL, 1997. "Entropy Based Measurement Of Geographic Concentration In U.S. Hog Production," Faculty Series 97-02, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    4. Adhikari, Bishwa B. & Harsh, Stephen B. & Cheney, Laura Martin, 2003. "Factors Affecting Regional Shifts Of U.S Pork Production," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22200, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Unterschultz, James R., 2000. "New Instruments For Co-Ordination And Risk Sharing Within The Canadian Beef Industry," Project Report Series 24046, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    6. Hubbell, Bryan J. & Welsh, Rick, 1998. "An Examination Of Trends In Geographic Concentration In U.S. Hog Production, 1974-96," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Timothy Matisziw & James Hipple, 2001. "Spatial Clustering and State/County Legislation: The Case of Hog Production in Missouri," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 719-730.
    8. Jeffrey M. Gillespie & Joan R. Fulton, 2001. "A Markov chain analysis of the size of hog production firms in the United States," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 557-570.
    9. Martinez, Stephen W., 2000. "Price and Quality of Pork and Broiler Products: What's the Role of Vertical Coordination?," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33759, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Herath, Deepananda P.B. & Weersink, Alfons & Carpentier, Chantal Line, 2005. "Spatial Dynamics of the Livestock Sector in the United States: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Antonovitz, Frances & Buhr, Brian L. & Liu, Donald J., 1996. "Vertical Integration Incentives In Meat Product Markets," Staff Papers 13989, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Schuck, Eric C. & Birchall, Scott, 2001. "Manure Bmp Adoption Among North Dakota Animal Feed Operations," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36046, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. Hoag, Dana L. & Lacy, Michael G. & Davis, Jessica, 2004. "Pressures and Preferences Affecting Willingness to Apply Beef Manure on Crops in the Colorado High Plains," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Norris, Patricia E. & Thurow, Amy Purvis, 1997. "Environmental Policy And Technology Adoption In Animal Agriculture," Staff Paper Series 11660, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    15. John D. Lawrence & Erda Wang, 1998. "Motivations for exiting hog production in the 1990s and incentives for re-entry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 453-465.
    16. Martinez, Stephen W., 1999. "Vertical Coordination in the Pork and Broiler Industries: Implications for Pork and Chicken Products," Agricultural Economic Reports 34031, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. James Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2017. "Nutrient Pollution: A Wicked Challenge for Economic Instruments," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-39, April.
    18. Hurley, Terrance M. & Orazem, Peter F. & Kliebenstein, James B., 2000. "Changes In The Structure Of Wages In The U.S. Pork Industry," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21744, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Schuck, Eric C., 2005. "On-farm Manure Storage Adoption Rates: the Roles of Herd Size, Spreading Acreage and Cost-share Programs," CAFRI: Current Agriculture, Food and Resource Issues, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society, issue 6, pages 1-14, May.
    20. Hennessy, David A., 1996. "Information Asymmetry As a Reason for Vertical Integration," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10422, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedhep:y:1997:i:jan:p:2-13:n:v.21no.1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lauren Wiese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.