IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i2p295-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax Optimization Schemes for Income Tax in Europe and Relevance for Businesses and Society

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Smolen- Bojanczyk

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this article is to analyse how tax optimization schemes for Corporate Income Tax (CIT) in the European Union may impact the societies. Emphasis is placed on how these phenomena were incorporated into the business activities of modern corporations, and how increasing its application and adoption. In addition, will be identified challenges that may be posed before tax authorities of EU Countries, as a consequences of increasing popularity of tax optimization schemes. Design/Methodology/Approach: This article formulates the following research problems: What are the tax optimization schemes for Income Tax in the European Union? What are the potential deficiencies and obstacles in EU CIT legislation of different policy approaches for addressing these schemes as challenges? Corresponding to this research problem the research hypothesis was formulated: The increasing popularity of tax optimization schemes in the field of CIT among international corporations has a negative impact on the state of public finances of European Union countries. Moreover these phenomena/trends are difficult to be controlled under the current legal regulations. The study employs a detailed analysis of existing scientific literature, standards and regulations related to taxes field. The analysed sources include books, financial statements and scientific articles aimed at understanding the theoretical foundations of tax regulations and tax schemes, as well as identifying challenges in this field. Findings: To avoid reducing public revenues, the European Union should strengthen and harmonise its actions in the field of tax avoidance, especially by large international corporations. In order to achieve this goal should be created an efficient European Union tax policy system. Practical Implications: The results of the study indicate negative, social and economic consequences for European countries of using tax optimization in the area of Corporate Income Tax, especially by large international corporations. The article describes only those optimization strategies, which construction have been recognized and examined, and which have been regulated to some extent. The author pointed out that it is not easy to regulate and solve problems of income tax optimizations, especially in the area of new technologies. In such cases it is difficult to clearly link income with the place of its generation, as in online services or Internet advertising. This area is extremely dynamic and law-making bodies and tax authorities still face many challenges to regulate these issues and persuade large corporations to participate in social costs of individual countries. Originality/Value: The article presents a comprehensive approach to the increasing phenomenon of tax optimizations with particular emphasis on its impact on contemporary business organizations and societies. It discusses key problems, methods and potential recommendations in order to reduce the problem

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Smolen- Bojanczyk, 2025. "Tax Optimization Schemes for Income Tax in Europe and Relevance for Businesses and Society," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 295-306.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:295-306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3979/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Filippi, Primavera, 2013. "Taxing the cloud: introducing a new taxation system on data collection?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 2(2), pages 1-7.
    2. Maarten ‘t Riet & Arjan Lejour, 2018. "Optimal tax routing: network analysis of FDI diversion," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1321-1371, October.
    3. Ronan Merle & Bakr Al-Gamrh & Tanveer Ahsan, 2019. "Tax havens and transfer pricing intensity: Evidence from the French CAC-40 listed firms," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1647918-164, January.
    4. James Alm, 2012. "Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 19(1), pages 54-77, February.
    5. Kostantinos J. Liapis & Evangelos D. Politis & Dimitra Ntertsou & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "Investigating the Relationship between Tax Revenues and Tax Ratios: An Empirical Research for Selected OECD Countries," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 215-229.
    6. Ronan Merle & Bakr Al-Gamrh & Tanveer Ahsan, 2019. "Tax havens and transfer pricing intensity: Evidence from the French CAC-40 listed firms," Post-Print hal-02332055, HAL.
    7. Maarten ‘t Riet & Arjan Lejour, 2018. "Optimal tax routing: network analysis of FDI diversion," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1321-1371, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. Eriotis & S. Missiakoulis & I. Ntokas & M. Tzavaras & D. Vasiliou & E. Thalassinos, 2021. "Tax Αvoidance and Transfer Pricing: A VECM Regression Model," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 11(1), pages 50-67.
    2. Sebastian Beer & Jan Loeprick, 2021. "Too high a price? Tax treaties with investment hubs in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(1), pages 113-153, February.
    3. European Commission, 2018. "Tax Policies in the European Union: 2018 Survey," Taxation Survey 2018, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    4. Sunghoon Hong, 2018. "Tax treaties and foreign direct investment: a network approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1277-1320, October.
    5. Prianto Budi Saptono & Gustofan Mahmud & Fauzilah Salleh & Intan Pratiwi & Dwi Purwanto & Ismail Khozen, 2024. "Tax Complexity and Firm Tax Evasion: A Cross-Country Investigation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-36, April.
    6. Beer,Sebastian & Loeprick,Jan, 2018. "The Cost and Benefits of Tax Treaties with Investment Hubs : Findings from Sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8623, The World Bank.
    7. Ronald B. Davies & Neill Killeen, 2018. "The Effect of Tax Treaties on Market Based Finance: Evidence using Firm-Level Data," Working Papers 201818, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    8. European Commission, 2017. "Tax Policies in the European Union: 2017 Survey," Taxation Survey 2017, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    9. Jacquemet, N. & Luchini, S. & Malézieux, A. & Shogren, J.F., 2020. "Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    10. Schnellenbach, Jan & Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Behavioral political economy: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 395-417.
    11. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "On evasion behaviour in public transport: Dissatisfaction or contagion?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 626-651.
    12. Gunter, Samara, 2013. "State Earned Income Tax Credits and Participation in Regular and Informal Work," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 66(1), pages 33-62, March.
    13. Laszlo Goerke, 2014. "Tax Evasion by Individuals," IAAEU Discussion Papers 201409, Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
    14. Laudage, Sabine, 2020. "Corporate tax revenue and foreign direct investment: Potential trade-offs and how to address them," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    15. Jan-Emmanuel De Neve & Clément Imbert & Johannes Spinnewijn & Teodora Tsankova & Maarten Luts, 2021. "How to Improve Tax Compliance? Evidence from Population-Wide Experiments in Belgium," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(5), pages 1425-1463.
    16. Alm, James & Bruner, David M. & McKee, Michael, 2016. "Honesty or dishonesty of taxpayer communications in an enforcement regime," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 85-96.
    17. Martin Abraham & Kerstin Lorek & Friedemann Richter & Matthias Wrede, 2017. "Collusive tax evasion and social norms," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(2), pages 179-197, April.
    18. Montalvo, José G. & Piolatto, Amedeo & Raya, Josep, 2020. "Transaction-tax evasion in the housing market," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Bazart, C. & Bonein, A., 2014. "Reciprocal relationships in tax compliance decisions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 83-102.
    20. Michele Lalla & Patrizio Frederic & Daniela Mantovani, 2022. "The inextricable association of measurement errors and tax evasion as examined through a microanalysis of survey data matched with fiscal data: a case study," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(5), pages 1375-1401, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:295-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.