IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v22y2012icp20-28.html

Container movement by rail in India: A review of policy evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Gangwar, Rachna
  • Morris, Sebastian
  • Pandey, Ajay
  • Raghuram, G.

Abstract

Container movement by rail was a monopoly of Indian Railways (IR) until 2005. Its subsidiary Container Corporation (CONCOR) was the sole operator of container trains. Entry of other entities in 2007 has been driven by larger public policy concerns. In the process, issues such as incumbent resistance, entry barriers, and lack of level playing field had an impact. These issues were enhanced by the use of a closely held organisation as a consultant, and conflicting roles of IR as licensor, regulator, service provider, and operator. This paper attempts to review the process starting from the policy announcement (February 2005) to evolution of a Model Concession Agreement (January 2007). It shows how policies were influenced by the incumbent to restrict competition by creating barriers on the one hand and how an alternate view provided by external entities, like the Planning Commission and other non-IR stakeholders significantly altered the course of action leading to entry of a large number of competing players.

Suggested Citation

  • Gangwar, Rachna & Morris, Sebastian & Pandey, Ajay & Raghuram, G., 2012. "Container movement by rail in India: A review of policy evolution," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 20-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:22:y:2012:i:c:p:20-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X12000716
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell Pittman, 2009. "Competition Issues in Restructuring Ports and Railways, Including Brief Consideration of these Sectors in India," EAG Discussions Papers 200906, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    2. Affuso, Luisa, 2003. "Auctions of rail capacity?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 43-46, March.
    3. Pittman Russell, 2005. "Structural Separation to Create Competition? The Case of Freight Railways," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, September.
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:15024 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Raghuram & Rachna Gangwar & Charu Rastogi, 2023. "A Critique of the Initiative for Public–Private Partnership in Passenger Train Operations1," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 48(1), pages 7-20, March.
    2. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    3. G Raghuram, Rachna Gangwar and Charu Rastogi & Rachna Gangwar & G Raghuram, 2020. "A Critique of the Initiative for Public Private Partnership in Passenger Train Operations," Working Papers 02-01, Adani Institute of Infrastructure Management, Ahmedabad.
    4. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    5. Deshmukh, Ajay & Song, Dong-Wook, 2024. "Probing into hinterland connectivity with a web of transport modes and logistics nodes: A case of Indian container ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Sitharamaraju, K. & Beerelli, Santhosh Kumar & Yelne, Saket Anil & Narayanaswami, Sundaravalli, 2020. "Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Indian Railways: Models, Framework, and Policies," IIMA Working Papers WP 2020-12-05, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pittman, Russell, 2011. "Risk-averse restructuring of freight railways in China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 152-160.
    2. Poinsot, Philippe, 2016. "Jules Dupuit And The Railroads: What Is The Role Of The State?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 189-209, June.
    3. Ivaldi, Marc & McCullough, Gerard, 2007. "Railroad Pricing and Revenue-to-Cost Margins in the Post-Staggers Era," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 153-178, January.
    4. Juan J Montero & Rodolfo Ramos Melero, 2022. "Competitive tendering for rail track capacity: The liberalization of railway services in Spain," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 23(1), pages 43-59, March.
    5. Sandra Jódar-Rosell & Jordi Gual, 2010. "The Strange Couple: Regulation and Competition Policy in Network Industries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(3), pages 19-23, October.
    6. Mizutani, Fumitoshi, 2020. "A comparison of vertical structural types in the railway industry: A simple mathematical explanation model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Abbott, Malcolm & Cohen, Bruce, 2016. "The privatization and de-privatization of rail industry assets in Australia and New Zealand," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 48-56.
    8. Price, Richard, 2012. "Towards a more efficient railway: The Beesley lecture," MPRA Paper 74979, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Lalive, Rafael & Schmutzler, Armin, 2008. "Exploring the effects of competition for railway markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 443-458, March.
    10. Wetzel, Heike & Growitsch, Christian, 2006. "Economies of Scope in European Railways: An Efficiency Analysis," IWH Discussion Papers 5/2006, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    11. Ait Ali, Abderrahman & Warg, Jennifer & Eliasson, Jonas, 2020. "Pricing commercial train path requests based on societal costs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 452-464.
    12. Brennan, Timothy J., 2005. "Alleged Transmission Undersupply: Is Restructuring the Cure or the Cause?," Discussion Papers 10723, Resources for the Future.
    13. Matthias Finger & Dominique Finon, 2011. "From ‘Service Public’ to Universal Service: The Case of the European Union," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Cherbonnier, Frédéric & Salant, David & Van Der Straeten, Karine, 2021. "Getting auctions for transportation capacity to roll," TSE Working Papers 21-1254, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    15. Gangwar, Rachna & Raghuram, G., 2010. "Container Train Operators in India: Problems and Prospects," IIMA Working Papers WP2010-09-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    16. Merkert, Rico, 2010. "Changes in transaction costs over time - The case of franchised train operating firms in Britain," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 52-59.
    17. Finger, Matthias, 2014. "Governance of competition and performance in European railways: An analysis of five cases," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 278-288.
    18. Fitzová Hana, 2017. "European railway reforms and efficiency: Review of evidence in the literature," Review of Economic Perspectives, Paradigm, vol. 17(2), pages 103-120, June.
    19. Coublucq Daniel & Ivaldi Marc & McCullough Gerard, 2018. "The Static-Dynamic Efficiency Trade-off in the US Rail Freight Industry: Assessment of an Open Access Policy," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 267-301, December.
    20. José A. Gómez-Ibáñez, 2016. "Open Access to Infrastructure Networks: The Experience of Railroads," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 49(2), pages 311-345, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:22:y:2012:i:c:p:20-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.