IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v167y2025icp42-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intercity Road Transportation Assessment: Double-Frontier Q-Cross-Efficiency Method

Author

Listed:
  • Ganji, Seyedreza Seyedalizadeh
  • Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee

Abstract

Road transportation is a crucial component of the overall transportation system, providing public services for both passengers and freight. It is imperative for both government entities and transport operators to continuously assess and enhance the performance of road transportation to effectively meet the needs of passengers and freight stakeholders. This research aims to provide road transportation policymakers with a novel and effective hybrid method that incorporates Q-methodology to address the limitations of the conventional Cross-Efficiency (CE) method, particularly by utilizing both correlated and uncorrelated perspectives. The Q-methodology enables policymakers to identify and exclude Decision-Makers' (DMs') viewpoints, including sets of cross-efficiencies with low correlations, during the analysis process. It employs factor analysis to extract consensus perspectives, thereby providing a more realistic assessment of transportation unit efficiency and reducing the likelihood of biased results. The proposed technique incorporates the Q-methodology into the double-frontier CE method, referred to as DFQCE, to enhance its effectiveness by eliminating uncorrelated viewpoints from the efficiency evaluation process. The conventional CE method utilizes both correlated and uncorrelated viewpoints, which may introduce bias into the results. Furthermore, recent critiques have emerged regarding efficiency evaluations that rely solely on the efficient frontier, as these evaluations do not take into account the assessment results of transportation units from a pessimistic viewpoint, which may differ significantly from those based on the efficient frontier. By incorporating both pessimistic and optimistic perspectives, Double-Frontier Q-based Cross Efficiency (DFQCE) aims to produce more comprehensive outcomes compared to the conventional CE method. To validate the developed methodology, the road transportation operations of thirty-one Iranian provinces are evaluated using four input and three output indicators. Loading factors of 0.7 and 0.6 are selected for the optimistic and pessimistic views, respectively, to encompass the broadest range of cross-efficiencies, accounting for 93% and 96%. To enhance the performance of provinces facing subpar conditions, policy, and theoretical implications are suggested. The findings will be of considerable significance to provincial administrators and national policymakers in road transportation, as they provide insights that can facilitate more effective management of the sector by addressing inefficiencies within the provinces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ganji, Seyedreza Seyedalizadeh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2025. "Intercity Road Transportation Assessment: Double-Frontier Q-Cross-Efficiency Method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 42-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:167:y:2025:i:c:p:42-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000861
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:167:y:2025:i:c:p:42-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.