IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v167y2025icp42-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intercity Road Transportation Assessment: Double-Frontier Q-Cross-Efficiency Method

Author

Listed:
  • Ganji, Seyedreza Seyedalizadeh
  • Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee

Abstract

Road transportation is a crucial component of the overall transportation system, providing public services for both passengers and freight. It is imperative for both government entities and transport operators to continuously assess and enhance the performance of road transportation to effectively meet the needs of passengers and freight stakeholders. This research aims to provide road transportation policymakers with a novel and effective hybrid method that incorporates Q-methodology to address the limitations of the conventional Cross-Efficiency (CE) method, particularly by utilizing both correlated and uncorrelated perspectives. The Q-methodology enables policymakers to identify and exclude Decision-Makers' (DMs') viewpoints, including sets of cross-efficiencies with low correlations, during the analysis process. It employs factor analysis to extract consensus perspectives, thereby providing a more realistic assessment of transportation unit efficiency and reducing the likelihood of biased results. The proposed technique incorporates the Q-methodology into the double-frontier CE method, referred to as DFQCE, to enhance its effectiveness by eliminating uncorrelated viewpoints from the efficiency evaluation process. The conventional CE method utilizes both correlated and uncorrelated viewpoints, which may introduce bias into the results. Furthermore, recent critiques have emerged regarding efficiency evaluations that rely solely on the efficient frontier, as these evaluations do not take into account the assessment results of transportation units from a pessimistic viewpoint, which may differ significantly from those based on the efficient frontier. By incorporating both pessimistic and optimistic perspectives, Double-Frontier Q-based Cross Efficiency (DFQCE) aims to produce more comprehensive outcomes compared to the conventional CE method. To validate the developed methodology, the road transportation operations of thirty-one Iranian provinces are evaluated using four input and three output indicators. Loading factors of 0.7 and 0.6 are selected for the optimistic and pessimistic views, respectively, to encompass the broadest range of cross-efficiencies, accounting for 93% and 96%. To enhance the performance of provinces facing subpar conditions, policy, and theoretical implications are suggested. The findings will be of considerable significance to provincial administrators and national policymakers in road transportation, as they provide insights that can facilitate more effective management of the sector by addressing inefficiencies within the provinces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ganji, Seyedreza Seyedalizadeh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2025. "Intercity Road Transportation Assessment: Double-Frontier Q-Cross-Efficiency Method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 42-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:167:y:2025:i:c:p:42-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000861
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Di & Xu, Liqun & Li, Jinpei, 2020. "Does technical efficiency play a mediating role between bus facility scale and ridership attraction? Evidence from bus practices in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 77-96.
    2. Losa, Eduardo Tola & Arjomandi, Amir & Hervé Dakpo, K. & Bloomfield, Jason, 2020. "Efficiency comparison of airline groups in Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 countries: A dynamic network DEA approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 163-174.
    3. Ganji, S.S. & Dehghani, Alireza & Ajirlu, Shahrouz Fathi, 2024. "Evaluation of intercity road passenger transportation using a novel double-frontier game-regret-cross-efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Zhang, Yijia & Cheng, Lu, 2023. "The role of transport infrastructure in economic growth: Empirical evidence in the UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 223-233.
    5. Jorge H. Luna & Julio Mar-Ortiz & María D. Gracia & Dionicio Morales-Ramírez, 2018. "An efficiency analysis of cargo-handling operations at container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(2), pages 190-210, June.
    6. See, Kok Fong & Rashid, Azwan Abdul & Yu, Ming-Miin, 2024. "Measuring the network capacity utilization, energy consumption and environmental inefficiency of global airlines," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Wang, Ying-Ming & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2011. "The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 493-503, October.
    8. Bhatia, Vinod & Sharma, Seema, 2024. "Trends and policy analysis: A case for sustainable transport systems in India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 76-86.
    9. Aytekin, Ahmet & Korucuk, Selçuk & Görçün, Ömer Faruk, 2024. "Determining the factors affecting transportation demand management and selecting the best strategy: A case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 150-166.
    10. Song, Yao-yao & Li, Jing-jing & Wang, Jin-li & Yang, Guo-liang & Chen, Zhenling, 2022. "Eco-efficiency of Chinese transportation industry: A DEA approach with non-discretionary input," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2017. "Airline efficiency measures using a Dynamic Epsilon-Based Measure model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 121-134.
    12. Tomikawa, Tadaaki & Goto, Mika, 2022. "Efficiency assessment of Japanese National Railways before and after privatization and divestiture using data envelopment analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 44-55.
    13. Omrani, Hashem & Yang, Zijiang & Karbasian, Arash & Teplova, Tamara, 2023. "Combination of top-down and bottom-up DEA models using PCA: A two-stage network DEA with shared input and undesirable output for evaluation of the road transport sector," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Lei Chen & Ying-Ming Wang & Yan Huang, 2020. "Cross-efficiency aggregation method based on prospect consensus process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 115-135, May.
    15. Scheraga, Carl A., 2011. "Strategic fit in the general freight motor carrier industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 490-506, July.
    16. von Hirschhausen, Christian & Cullmann, Astrid, 2010. "A nonparametric efficiency analysis of German public transport companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 436-445, May.
    17. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    18. Heydari, Chiman & Omrani, Hashem & Taghizadeh, Rahim, 2020. "A fully fuzzy network DEA-Range Adjusted Measure model for evaluating airlines efficiency: A case of Iran," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Krabbenborg, Lizet & Molin, Eric & Annema, Jan Anne & van Wee, Bert, 2020. "Public frames in the road pricing debate: A Q-methodology study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 46-53.
    20. S. S. Ganji & A. N. Ahangar & Samaneh Jamshidi Bandari, 2022. "Evaluation of vehicular emissions reduction strategies using a novel hybrid method integrating BWM, Q methodology and ER approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11576-11614, October.
    21. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    22. Jonathan Cowie, 2002. "Acquisition, efficiency and scale economies: An analysis of the British bus industry," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 147-157, January.
    23. Ganji, Seyedreza Seyedalizadeh & Rassafi, Amir Abbas & Bandari, Samaneh Jamshidi, 2020. "Application of evidential reasoning approach and OWA operator weights in road safety evaluation considering the best and worst practice frontiers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    24. Martijn Brons & Peter Nijkamp & Eric Pels & Piet Rietveld, 2005. "Efficiency of urban public transit: A meta analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-21, January.
    25. Kumbhakar, Subal C & Bhattacharyya, Arunava, 1996. "Productivity Growth in Passenger-Bus Transportation: A Heteroskedastic Error Component Model with Unbalanced Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 557-573.
    26. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Thompson, Russell, 2022. "Designing sustainable intermodal freight transportation networks using a controlled rail tariff discounting policy – The Iranian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 59-77.
    27. Kivits, Robbert & Charles, Michael B., 2015. "Aviation planning policy in Australia: Identifying frames of reference to support public decision making," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 102-111.
    28. Zhang, Chunqin & Xiao, Guangnian & Liu, Yong & Yu, Feng, 2018. "The relationship between organizational forms and the comprehensive effectiveness for public transport services in China?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 783-802.
    29. Sun, Jiasen & Yuan, Yang & Yang, Rui & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2017. "Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-86.
    30. Gong, Xiaoxing & Wu, Xiaofan & Luo, Meifeng, 2019. "Company performance and environmental efficiency: A case study for shipping enterprises," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 96-106.
    31. Chiou, Yu-Chiun & Lan, Lawrence W. & Yen, Barbara T.H., 2010. "A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 477-489, March.
    32. Pal, Debdatta & Mitra, Subrata K., 2016. "An application of the directional distance function with the number of accidents as an undesirable output to measure the technical efficiency of state road transport in India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-12.
    33. Odeck, James, 2006. "Congestion, ownership, region of operation, and scale: Their impact on bus operator performance in Norway," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 52-69, March.
    34. Ganji, S.S. & Ahangar, A.N. & Awasthi, Anjali & Jamshidi Bandari, Smaneh, 2021. "Psychological analysis of intercity bus passenger satisfaction using Q methodology," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 345-363.
    35. Ganji, S.S. & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee & Jahed, Rasul, 2024. "Evaluating the performance of intercity road freight transport: Double-frontier parallel network cross-efficiency model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    36. Odeck, James, 2008. "The effect of mergers on efficiency and productivity of public transport services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 696-708, May.
    37. Chu, Xuehao & Fielding, Gordon J. & Lamar, Bruce W., 1992. "Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 223-230, May.
    38. Zarbakhshnia, Navid & Ma, Zhenliang, 2024. "Critical success factors for the adoption of AVs in sustainable urban transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 62-76.
    39. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2019. "Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 364-375.
    40. Beniamina Margari & Fabrizio Erbetta & Carmelo Petraglia & Massimiliano Piacenza, 2007. "Regulatory and environmental effects on public transit efficiency: a mixed DEA-SFA approach," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 131-151, October.
    41. Yang, Guo-liang & Yang, Jian-bo & Liu, Wen-bin & Li, Xiao-xuan, 2013. "Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 393-404.
    42. Rajé, Fiona, 2007. "Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 467-477, November.
    43. Kleinsorge, Ilene K. & Schary, Philip B. & Tanner, Ray D., 1992. "Data Envelopment Analysis for monitoring customer-supplier relationships," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 357-372.
    44. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    45. Milakis, Dimitris & Kroesen, Maarten & van Wee, Bert, 2018. "Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 142-148.
    46. Zhang, Chunqin & Juan, Zhicai & Luo, Qingyu & Xiao, Guangnian, 2016. "Performance evaluation of public transit systems using a combined evaluation method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 156-167.
    47. Gandhi, Nevil & Kant, Ravi & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2024. "Evaluation of benefits due to adoption of enablers of unimodal road to intermodal railroad freight transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 295-311.
    48. James Odeck & Abdulrahim Alkadi, 2001. "Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 211-232, August.
    49. Eduardo Tola Losa & Amir Arjomandi & K. Hervé Dakpo & Jason Bloomfield, 2020. "Efficiency comparison of airline groups in Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 countries: A dynamic network DEA approach [Comparaison de l'efficacité des groupes de compagnies aériennes dans les pays de l'Anne," Post-Print hal-03151906, HAL.
    50. Benjamin, Julian & Obeng, Kofi, 1990. "The effect of policy and background variables on total factor productivity for public transit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, February.
    51. Cheng, An & Jiang, Guogang & Teng, Xiangyu & Xu, Wenting & Li, Yimin & Wu, Longhui & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2024. "Changes in low-carbon transportation efficiency of Chinese roads after considering the impact of new energy vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 28-43.
    52. Pestana Barros, Carlos & Peypoch, Nicolas, 2010. "Productivity changes in Portuguese bus companies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 295-302, September.
    53. Zhao, Y. & Triantis, K. & Murray-Tuite, P. & Edara, P., 2011. "Performance measurement of a transportation network with a downtown space reservation system: A network-DEA approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1140-1159.
    54. Yu, Ming-Miin & Fan, Chih-Ku, 2009. "Measuring the performance of multimode bus transit: A mixed structure network DEA model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 501-515, May.
    55. Lu, Wen-Min & Wang, Wei-Kang & Hung, Shiu-Wan & Lu, En-Tzu, 2012. "The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: Production and marketing efficiency perspectives," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 529-544.
    56. Yanli Ma & Jieyu Zhu & Gaofeng Gu & Ke Chen, 2020. "Freight Transportation and Economic Growth for Zones: Sustainability and Development Strategy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    57. Mario Cools & Elke Moons & Brecht Janssens & Geert Wets, 2009. "Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: profiling travelers using Q-methodology," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 437-453, July.
    58. Liang Liang & Jie Wu & Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu, 2008. "The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1278-1288, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganji, S.S. & Dehghani, Alireza & Ajirlu, Shahrouz Fathi, 2024. "Evaluation of intercity road passenger transportation using a novel double-frontier game-regret-cross-efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Ganji, S.S. & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee & Jahed, Rasul, 2024. "Evaluating the performance of intercity road freight transport: Double-frontier parallel network cross-efficiency model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Cinzia Daraio & Marco Diana & Flavia Di Costa & Claudio Leporelli & Giorgio Matteucci & Alberto Nastasi, 2014. "Efficiency and effectiveness in the urban public transport sector: a critical review with directions for future research," DIAG Technical Reports 2014-14, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    4. Pal, Debdatta & Mitra, Subrata K., 2016. "An application of the directional distance function with the number of accidents as an undesirable output to measure the technical efficiency of state road transport in India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Feng Li & Han Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang & Gang Kou, 2021. "Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 173-210, July.
    6. Cui, Yuan & Pan, Hao & Huang, Yi-Di & Yang, Guo-liang, 2024. "How can sociological theories provide legitimacy to eco-efficiency evaluations? Embark on a journey toward understanding," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Yao, Di & Xu, Liqun & Li, Jinpei, 2020. "Does technical efficiency play a mediating role between bus facility scale and ridership attraction? Evidence from bus practices in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 77-96.
    8. Jiang, Xiaodan & Zhan, Zhifan & Ren, Wei & Tao, Xuezong & Zheng, Shiyuan & Luo, Meifeng, 2025. "Balancing economic and environmental strategies in regional hinterland transport: A dynamic network cross efficiency analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 128-154.
    9. Zhang, Chunqin & Xiao, Guangnian & Liu, Yong & Yu, Feng, 2018. "The relationship between organizational forms and the comprehensive effectiveness for public transport services in China?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 783-802.
    10. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Di Yao & Liqun Xu & Jinpei Li, 2019. "Evaluating the Performance of Public Transit Systems: A Case Study of Eleven Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Karlaftis, Matthew G. & Tsamboulas, Dimitrios, 2012. "Efficiency measurement in public transport: Are findings specification sensitive?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 392-402.
    13. Anand Venkatesh & Shivam Kushwaha, 2017. "Measuring technical efficiency of passenger bus companies in India: a non-radial data envelopment analysis approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(4), pages 706-723, December.
    14. Huang, Wencheng & Shuai, Bin & Sun, Yan & Wang, Yang & Antwi, Eric, 2018. "Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 292-303.
    15. Omrani, Hashem & Yang, Zijiang & Karbasian, Arash & Teplova, Tamara, 2023. "Combination of top-down and bottom-up DEA models using PCA: A two-stage network DEA with shared input and undesirable output for evaluation of the road transport sector," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Saransh Tiwari & Sanjeet Singh & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2023. "Comprehensive evaluation of passenger road transportation through dynamic network data envelopment analysis: A case study of state road transport undertakings in India," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4311-4332, December.
    17. Xing-Xian Zhang & Lei Chen & Xu Wang & Wenjin Zuo & Lijun Liu & Ying-Ming Wang, 2025. "A new cross-efficiency aggregation in data envelopment analysis: considering fairness mentality and group consensus," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-33, June.
    18. Zhang, Chunqin & Juan, Zhicai & Luo, Qingyu & Xiao, Guangnian, 2016. "Performance evaluation of public transit systems using a combined evaluation method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 156-167.
    19. Hao Pan & Guo-liang Yang & Xiao-lei Chen & Yuan-yu Lou & Teng Wang & Zhong-cheng Guan, 2024. "Regret cross-efficiency evaluation using attitudinal entropy approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Brida, Juan Gabriel & Deidda, Manuela & Pulina, Manuela, 2014. "Tourism and transport systems in mountain environments: analysis of the economic efficiency of cableways in South Tyrol," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-11.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:167:y:2025:i:c:p:42-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.