IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v197y2025ics1366554525001176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

STraM: A strategic network design model for national freight transport decarbonization

Author

Listed:
  • Bakker, Steffen J.S.
  • Martin, Jonas
  • van Beesten, E. Ruben
  • Brynildsen, Ingvild Synnøve
  • Sandvig, Anette
  • Siqveland, Marit
  • Golab, Antonia

Abstract

National freight transport models are valuable tools for assessing the impact of various policies and investments on achieving decarbonization targets under different future scenarios. However, these models struggle to address several critical elements necessary for strategic planning, such as the development and adoption of new fuel technologies over time, inertia in transport fleets, and uncertainty surrounding future transport costs. In this paper, we develop a strategic network design model, named STraM, that explicitly incorporates these key factors. STraM, being a two-stage stochastic program, effectively handles long-term uncertainty by considering different future scenarios in its decision-making process.It provides a network design plan that includes infrastructure investments and fuel technology decisions, aiming to achieve cost-effective decarbonization of the freight transport system. The model output can be used as input for higher-resolution national freight transport models to yield results with greater operational detail. We demonstrate the application of STraM through a case study of Norway, offering valuable insights into the strategic planning of decarbonizing freight transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Bakker, Steffen J.S. & Martin, Jonas & van Beesten, E. Ruben & Brynildsen, Ingvild Synnøve & Sandvig, Anette & Siqveland, Marit & Golab, Antonia, 2025. "STraM: A strategic network design model for national freight transport decarbonization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525001176
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525001176
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia L. Higle & Stein W. Wallace, 2003. "Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty in Linear Programming," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 53-60, August.
    2. Giovanni Pantuso & Trine K. Boomsma, 2020. "On the number of stages in multistage stochastic programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 581-603, September.
    3. Verônica Ghisolfi & Lóránt Antal Tavasszy & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Rodriguez Correia & Gisele de Lorena Diniz Chaves & Glaydston Mattos Ribeiro, 2024. "Dynamics of freight transport decarbonisation: a conceptual model," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 239-257, March.
    4. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    5. Gerard Jong & Inge Vierth & Lori Tavasszy & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2013. "Recent developments in national and international freight transport models within Europe," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 347-371, February.
    6. Aguas, Oriana & Bachmann, Chris, 2022. "Assessing the effects of input uncertainties on the outputs of a freight demand model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Archetti, Claudia & Peirano, Lorenzo & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2022. "Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A Survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 1-20.
    8. Arnold, Pierre & Peeters, Dominique & Thomas, Isabelle, 2004. "Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 255-270, May.
    9. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    10. Ben Groom & Moritz A. Drupp & Mark C. Freeman & Frikk Nesje, 2022. "The Future, Now: A Review of Social Discounting," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 467-491, October.
    11. Yang, Kai & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2016. "Planning and optimization of intermodal hub-and-spoke network under mixed uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 248-266.
    12. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michael Florian & José-Eugenio Léal, 1990. "A Model for the Strategic Planning of National Freight Transportation by Rail," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Laporte, Gilbert, 1997. "Planning models for freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 409-438, March.
    14. Meersman, Hilde & Van de Voorde, Eddy, 2019. "Freight transport models: Ready to support transport policy of the future?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 97-101.
    15. Daniel Ruben Pinchasik & Inger Beate Hovi & Christian Svendsen Mjøsund & Stein Erik Grønland & Erik Fridell & Martin Jerksjö, 2020. "Crossing Borders and Expanding Modal Shift Measures: Effects on Mode Choice and Emissions from Freight Transport in the Nordics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    17. Christopher Hoehne & Matteo Muratori & Paige Jadun & Brian Bush & Arthur Yip & Catherine Ledna & Laura Vimmerstedt & Kara Podkaminer & Ookie Ma, 2023. "Exploring decarbonization pathways for USA passenger and freight mobility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Demir, Emrah & Burgholzer, Wolfgang & Hrušovský, Martin & Arıkan, Emel & Jammernegg, Werner & Woensel, Tom Van, 2016. "A green intermodal service network design problem with travel time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 789-807.
    19. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    20. Jacques Guélat & Michael Florian & Teodor Gabriel Crainic, 1990. "A Multimode Multiproduct Network Assignment Model for Strategic Planning of Freight Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 25-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steffen Jaap Skotvoll Bakker & Jonas Martin & E. Ruben van Beesten & Ingvild Synn{o}ve Brynildsen & Anette Sandvig & Marit Siqveland & Antonia Golab, 2023. "STraM: A strategic network design model for national freight transport decarbonization," Papers 2304.14001, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    2. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    3. Yamada, Tadashi & Febri, Zukhruf, 2015. "Freight transport network design using particle swarm optimisation in supply chain–transport supernetwork equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 164-187.
    4. Rosell, Francisca & Codina, Esteve & Montero, Lídia, 2022. "A combined and robust modal-split/traffic assignment model for rail and road freight transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 688-698.
    5. Hao Wang & Linda Nozick & Ningxiong Xu & Jared Gearhart, 2018. "Modeling ocean, rail, and truck transportation flows to support policy analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 327-357, September.
    6. Borgonovo, E. & Peccati, L., 2011. "Finite change comparative statics for risk-coherent inventories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 52-62, May.
    7. Julien Brunel, 2004. "Stochastic Risk vs. Policy Oriented Uncertainties: The Case of the Alpine Crossings," Post-Print halshs-00095852, HAL.
    8. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    9. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    10. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Alois Pichler, 2013. "Premiums And Reserves, Adjusted By Distortions," Papers 1304.0490, arXiv.org.
    12. Casavant, Ken & Jessup, Eric, 2005. "What Makes them Viable? Determining the Attributes that Offer Potential Viability to Inter-Modal Truck-Rail Facilities in Washington State," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208221, Transportation Research Forum.
    13. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2013. "A comparison of the original and revised Basel market risk frameworks for regulating bank capital," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 249-268.
    14. David Neděla & Sergio Ortobelli & Tomáš Tichý, 2024. "Mean–variance vs trend–risk portfolio selection," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(7), pages 2047-2078, July.
    15. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2012. "When more is less: Using multiple constraints to reduce tail risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2693-2716.
    16. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    17. Nan Zhang & Heng Xu, 2024. "Fairness of Ratemaking for Catastrophe Insurance: Lessons from Machine Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 469-488, June.
    18. Curtis, John & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Zubiate, Laura, 2016. "The impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on electricity markets: A case study on Ireland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 186-198.
    19. Gauvin, Charles & Delage, Erick & Gendreau, Michel, 2017. "Decision rule approximations for the risk averse reservoir management problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 317-336.
    20. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525001176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.