IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00095852.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stochastic Risk vs. Policy Oriented Uncertainties: The Case of the Alpine Crossings

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Brunel

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper focuses on uncertainties in traffic forecasting. Three major sources of uncertainties are observed for freight demand models. The first one is the model specification itself. We are not interested by it. The second one concerns uncertainties over forecasting hypotheses. A mean to control such uncertainties lies in the introduction of risk in the Costs Benefits Analysis (CBA). Two directions have been taken by this research. The first one is the theoretical framework of CBA under uncertainty mainly developed after Dixit and Pindyck (1994). The second one is more empirical and uses Monte Carlo simulations. Major results of these researches are presented. Then, we apply them to a large transport investment simulation. These tools cannot be used for all kinds of uncertainties. The second part of this paper deals with the third source of uncertainties i. e. policy oriented uncertainties. For them, previous methods are useless. The current Alpine crossings context shows that transport policy is a major determinant of traffics. Furthermore, long term forecasting cannot exclude the possibility of changes in transport policy. This uncertainty should be controlled. It is the role of strategic modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Brunel, 2004. "Stochastic Risk vs. Policy Oriented Uncertainties: The Case of the Alpine Crossings," Post-Print halshs-00095852, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00095852
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00095852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00095852/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maggi, Rico, 1992. "Swiss transport policy for Europe? Federalism and the dominance of local issues," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 193-198, March.
    2. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michael Florian & José-Eugenio Léal, 1990. "A Model for the Strategic Planning of National Freight Transportation by Rail," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Laporte, Gilbert, 1997. "Planning models for freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 409-438, March.
    4. Bruzelius, Nils & Flyvbjerg, Bent & Rothengatter, Werner, 2002. "Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 143-154, April.
    5. Kenneth J. Arrow & Robert C. Lind, 1974. "Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Chennat Gopalakrishnan (ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, chapter 3, pages 54-75, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Xuehao Chu & Steven Polzin, 2000. "Timing rules for major transportation investments," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 201-219, May.
    7. Jacques Guélat & Michael Florian & Teodor Gabriel Crainic, 1990. "A Multimode Multiproduct Network Assignment Model for Strategic Planning of Freight Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 25-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Wang & Linda Nozick & Ningxiong Xu & Jared Gearhart, 2018. "Modeling ocean, rail, and truck transportation flows to support policy analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 327-357, September.
    2. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    3. Shibasaki, Ryuichi & Ieda, Hitoshi & Watanabe, Tomihiro, 2005. "An International Container Shipping Model in East Asia and its Transferability," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 299-336, January.
    4. Haghani, Ali & Oh, Sei-Chang, 1996. "Formulation and solution of a multi-commodity, multi-modal network flow model for disaster relief operations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 231-250, May.
    5. Warsing, Donald P. & Souza, Gilvan C. & Greis, Noel P., 2001. "Determining the value of dedicated multimodal cargo facilities in a multi-region distribution network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 81-93, August.
    6. Pazour, Jennifer A. & Meller, Russell D. & Pohl, Letitia M., 2010. "A model to design a national high-speed rail network for freight distribution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 119-135, March.
    7. Steffen Jaap Skotvoll Bakker & Jonas Martin & E. Ruben van Beesten & Ingvild Synn{o}ve Brynildsen & Anette Sandvig & Marit Siqveland & Antonia Golab, 2023. "STraM: A strategic network design model for national freight transport decarbonization," Papers 2304.14001, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    8. Li, Xinyan & Xie, Chi & Bao, Zhaoyao, 2022. "A multimodal multicommodity network equilibrium model with service capacity and bottleneck congestion for China-Europe containerized freight flows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Yamada, Tadashi & Febri, Zukhruf, 2015. "Freight transport network design using particle swarm optimisation in supply chain–transport supernetwork equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 164-187.
    10. Yamada, Tadashi & Imai, Koji & Nakamura, Takamasa & Taniguchi, Eiichi, 2011. "A supply chain-transport supernetwork equilibrium model with the behaviour of freight carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 887-907.
    11. Piotr Gołębiowski & Marianna Jacyna & Andrzej Stańczak, 2021. "The Assessment of Energy Efficiency versus Planning of Rail Freight Traffic: A Case Study on the Example of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Rosell, Francisca & Codina, Esteve & Montero, Lídia, 2022. "A combined and robust modal-split/traffic assignment model for rail and road freight transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 688-698.
    13. Hussain A. Kharodawala & Ashutosh Mahajan & Jayan Moorkanat, 2022. "Multi-modal supply chain distribution problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(3), pages 747-768, September.
    14. van Riessen, B. & Negenborn, R.R. & Dekker, R. & Lodewijks, G., 2013. "Impact and relevance of transit disturbances on planning in intermodal container networks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2013-18, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Holler Branco, José Eduardo & Bartholomeu, Daniela Bacchi & Alves Junior, Paulo Nocera & Caixeta Filho, José Vicente, 2022. "Evaluation of the economic and environmental impacts from the addition of new railways to the brazilian's transportation network: An application of a network equilibrium model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 61-69.
    16. Zhao, Dongfang & Balusu, Suryaprasanna Kumar & Sheela, Parvathy Vinod & Li, Xiaopeng & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Eluru, Naveen, 2020. "Weight-categorized truck flow estimation: A data-fusion approach and a Florida case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Laporte, Gilbert, 1997. "Planning models for freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 409-438, March.
    18. Tadashi Yamada & Bona Frazila Russ & Jun Castro & Eiichi Taniguchi, 2009. "Designing Multimodal Freight Transport Networks: A Heuristic Approach and Applications," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 129-143, May.
    19. Geneviève Zembri-Mary & Virginie Engrand-Linder, 2023. "Urban planning law in the face of the Olympic challenge: Between innovation and criticism of exceptional urban regeneration," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 369-388, June.
    20. Eduardo Fernández-Arias & Ricardo Hausmann & Ugo Panizza, 2020. "Smart Development Banks," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 395-420, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk; uncertainty; traffic forecasting; Monte Carlo simulation; transport policy; Strategic models; Alpine crossings;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00095852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.